A small group gathered at the Edmonds Senior Center Thursday night for a presentation by Edmonds School District Superintendent Nick Brossoit and Executive Director of Business and Operations Stewart Myhre regarding the district’s $59 million Replacement Technology/Capital Levy now before voters.
The levy presentation was sponsored by the 32nd District Democrats as a community service. Mail-in ballots for the special election must be postmarked or deposited in a ballot drop-box no later than Feb. 9.
As expected, questions were raised about the district’s current use of tire crumb rubber infill on athletic fields, since field replacement is on the list of projects the levy would fund. The Edmonds City Council late last year imposed an 18-month ban on the installation of the crumb rubber turf following months of public testimony and discussion among councilmembers about possible health and environmental impacts of the material. (See more information at the end of this article about state legislation regarding crumb rubber that has been introduced during the current session.)
Brossoit stressed that no decision has been made on whether crumb rubber will be used in future fields. “In this replacement levy are the resources to have a turf field with some type of infill, but it doesn’t specify what type of infill,” he said. “The school board goes through a process before any project happens, and they bring in consultants and experts and they spend study session time to determine exactly how something is going to happen.”
He also referenced the studies that the district looked at regarding crumb rubber based on what the current literature indicates, and provided handouts summarizing them. You can see a link to those handouts here.
Here’s the breakdown of what the levy covers:
Highlights of the Thursday night’s presentation:
- – The levy is a replacement levy, meaning that the existing levy “goes away” if voters approve the proposed measure, Brossoit said. Addressing a question about whether the levy was a “1-for-1” replacement for the current levy, Brossoit said: “There’s a slight increase as we’re trying to do a bit more with this replacement, so it’s not a one-for-one. It may be a 110 for 1. But the 1 goes away. It depends on your property as to whether you will pay exactly the same or more…because there’s been a lot of growth and assessed valuation, there’s been more businesses and households that are paying into the base, so we don’t have the same households paying into the base going forward. The base is bigger.”
- – The majority of funding — $32,388,000 — will go toward technology, including over time providing a Chromebook for every Edmonds School District student in grades 3-12. Brossoit brought a sample Chromebook to pass around to those attending the meeting, and noted that unlike laptops, Chromebooks are much less expensive, more durable and are designed to be used when connected to the Internet, with most applications living in the cloud. In this way, teachers can control what students access in the classroom and students and teachers receive instant feedback on what students are learning, Brossoit and Myhre explained. Chromebooks have become the pad and paper for today’s students, he noted.
- – There is $11.7 million allocated to outdoor facilities improvements. One of the major projects is replacing the current baseball field at Edmonds-Woodway High School. The Edmonds-Woodway field located at the southwest corner of the high school has been in the wrong place since the original Edmonds High School was built in 1957, Myhre said. “The distance from home plate to the outfield is 285 feet. Nowadays, if you were to build a baseball field for high school students, it would be a minimum of 350-400.” Not only is the field too small, Myhre said, but there are other logistical challenges, including a very large pine tree in foul ball territory on the left field line. “The goal is to move that field around so that the outfield of appropriate length, is much safer for our players and the players that come and visit,” he said. The levy also includes installing turf baseball fields at Meadowdale and Lynnwood high schools, as well as replacing other existing turf fields at Lynnwood High School in summer of 2019. (The high school opened in 2009 and turf fields have a replacement life of 10 years, he noted.) In addition, the levy proposal calls for tennis court improvements at Edmonds-Woodway, Mountlake Terrace and Meadowdale high schools.
– A total of $8.3 million has been earmarked to upgrade roofing systems at several school, including Meadowdale High School, Hazelwood Elementary, Edmonds Elementary and Brier Terrace Middle School.
– And $1 million has been allocated for school/parent group partnership programs, which provides matching funds for fundraising efforts taking place in schools. The district match is based on the percentage of students receiving free/reduced lunch in the school where the project is taking place.
You can see a sample ballot here. You can learn more on the Edmonds School District levy webpage.
The Edmonds School District serves the cities of Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds, as well as portions of Brier and unincorporated Snohomish County.
Crumb rubber update: Bills have been introduced in the Washington State House and Senate during this legislative session that would require further study of the recycled tire infill. The Senate bill, 6540, would prohibit school districts from installing new fields made with the material unless several conditions are met. The House bill, 2547, prohibits both the installation and replacement of synthetic turf infill for use in a field, playground or recreational facility “unless the manufacturer demonstrates the safety of the synthetic turf to the department of ecology.”
I’m very supportive of the levy. As a Edmonds and Woodway resident for almost 2 decades, I’ve seen levy campaigns translate into successful programs at each school my children have attended. The choice to enhance classrooms with Chromebooks successfully speaks to two concerns: How do we ensure that we are providing our students with technology that can have an impact on learning AND how can we meet our goals in a cost-effective manner? The Chromebook and the application platform ensure that ALL students are experiencing technology and innovation and, at the same time, there is tremendous flexibility at each grade level. Elementary school students can use the Chromebooks in one way, and high school students can engage in a completely different experience. The capital projects are also great investments in our schools, which ultimately become great investments in our community’s greatest assets: our children.
Are Edmonds residents paying a disproportionate amount of property taxes for schools compared to Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, as well as portions of Brier and unincorporated Snohomish County?
Obviously, as hidden by the disingenuous School Board, the school levy is NOT a simple replacement levy as publicized…it is a replacement PLUS INCREASE !
Be more transparent in the future!!
Generally, I support the school district asking us for additional funds, especially since the state does not fully support our public schools. However, I would still like to see an independent look at the school’s request similar to what we see in the voter pamphlets for other propositions. That way we can read the pro (i.e. our school district) view, an independent analysis, and maybe even a con view (if someone was inclined to submit one). It would certainly help me make an educated decision on how this increase in our taxes will be spent vice just going on my feelings.
The only thing I’ve received other than the ballot is the school district’s newsletter (pro). I have sought out more info: the overview on the district’s website (pro), the school board’s proposition on the district website (pro), and the coverage in local media (mainly district view with some random comments pro and con), but I find all these lacking in detail.
I think an independent analysis would provide better insight into the reasons for the increase in the levy. For example, the 2012 Tech/Capital Levy was for $31.5M the replacement levy is for $59M (an 87% increase). There was some hand-waving done during the Senior Center presentation about why it is more, and there is a general list in the district overview, but no itemized list of every project and its estimated cost. Why isn’t this required and provided to the voters as it seems to be for state propositions?
I’d also like to understand how an 87% increase in the levy will be paid for by a 34% increase in levy rate (0.44/1000 in 2012, 0.59/1000 in 2016). I could guess why, but an independent analysis would more useful to everyone and would not be subject to speculation or bias.
Our Edmonds total Assessed Property Values for 2012 were $5.8B and that climbed to $7.4B in 2016, a 28% increase. So if the rate per $1000 were the same the tax would be 27% higher just as a result of the APV increase. That did not explain to total difference but it helps understand that when APV’s are rising the rate/1000 does not need to go up as much.
Yes, I understand (“I could guess” as I said above) that property values probably contribute, but my point is, why should we have to guess!?
Your point is valid and goes way beyond schools. Government in general does not like to be as transparent as their public statements would lead you to believe. All of us should try to find ways to “help” government be more open and complete in their work. I can just say that when I went to the public meetings to discuss this levy I found an open and complete discussion of all the details. When I asked questions of those responsible for the levy I have always been give full complete answers. I guess we need to find better ways to communicate with the public.
I think it would be helpful to have what the new levy would cost for several different home values. And compare the old cost with the new levy cost. Most people want to know what the effect will be on their tax bill.
Barbara – According the District’s overview I received in the mail, the estimated levy rate is 59 cents per $1,000 assessed value. You can estimate the amount you’ll pay for this levy by finding your home’s assessed value from the Snohomish County Assessor’s website, divide that by 1000, then multiply by 0.59. For example, using Zillow’s median home price for Edmonds of $450,000, the levy would cost that homeowner about $265/year for the four years of the levy. Again, the levy rate is just an estimate and the actual rate may vary slightly with changes in assessed value within your taxing district.
I’m reading this news story… Seeing that the WA State Supreme Court is going to force the State legislature to fund schools properly, that we as a nation are already in a recession and that $Billions have been lost in the stock market which has yet to affect employment (before we even get into 401k / mutual fund / retirement savings losses) and now an Even Larger School Levy???
I realize that marijuana is now legal in this state, yet what exactly is in the pipes of this school board?
https://www.edmonds.wednet.edu//site/Default.aspx?PageID=9201
$26,379,000.00 in technology spending divided by 20, 511 students is $1286.09 per student when I’m typing this on a $229 Dell laptop I bought on sale at Office Depot; which wasn’t even a Black Friday deal!
$11,700,000 for “field replacement” ?
I’m in the event management business, Rent Venues and know the costs to build venues.
You need to get cheaper bids from out of state firms that aren’t bloating up the in state price!!!
The school district website states that Levy’s are 20% of the district budget:
https://www.edmonds.wednet.edu/site/Default.aspx?PageID=1052
The Edmonds school board needs to tighten it’s belt and manage it’s money better since they are not kids in our candy store!!! Especially when every government in this state is expecting more “Candy” from us to pay for their poorly managed and bloated operations, and we just don’t have enough “Candy” to go around anymore !!!
Here’s the New Levy for you to put onto the ballot for this fall 2016 election:
You get 1/3 of what you’re asking for in this vote over the next four years ($5 mil) ; AND when the State provides more funding as required by the State Supreme Court, the levy STOPS!
We the people are NOT an all you can eat buffet!
So I’m voting NO on this $59 million dollar replacement for the expiring $31.5 million dollar Levy!
Find your sugar fix in Olympia!
Chris Ragen
Some clarifications:
First, the Washington State Supreme Court handed down the McCleary decision in 2012. Although the state is to fully fund education starting in 2018, it is doubted that they’ll meet that deadline. In 4 years, they have yet to make any significant progress instead choosing to incur fines than fund education because the fines are cheaper. To wait and rely on the state for our immediate needs is not prudent.
The total amount being requested for technology is $32+ million and is for more than just laptops. It also funds curriculum and instructional systems, computer labs, specific teaching & learning tools for special needs students & programs, projectors and other equipment, education and tech support for staff & teachers, network infrastructure upgrades, software and other tools for organizational support.
As for any amount determined per student, divide it by 4 as that is how many years the funds will be spread over.
Correction – the $11.7 million is for field improvements (Meadowdale and Lynnwood) and replacement (Edmonds-Woodway) as well as tennis court improvements at 3 high schools (EWHS, LHS, MHS) and field improvements at Cedar Valley Elementary. As you can see, it’s more than just 1 field. If it were, I’d agree that it’s exorbitant.
Not mentioned are other projects that will be funded such as roofs at 4 schools and funding for regulatory compliance such as water systems upgrades.
I’ve been a parent in the district some 12 years and have attended many a meeting regarding the various aspects of the district’s operations. It’s the reason why I know the above information regarding the levy. In my opinion and experience, the district does a tremendous job balancing a huge number of tasks, issues and competing priorities from parents and the community. Most people don’t have any idea of the number of hats we ask our teachers and staff to wear. Are they perfect? No – but none of us are. However, they do a great job. And, I would add, have been fiscally responsible.
Until the state steps up – which may be awhile – it’s up to us. Please vote “Yes” on the levy.