Council eyeing multi-family tax-exemption program to spur Westgate development

A map of the Westgate Mixed-Use Zone District, as approved by the Edmonds City Council in April 2015.
A map of the Westgate Mixed-Use Zone District, as approved by the Edmonds City Council in April 2015.

At the July 26 Edmonds City Council meeting, councilmembers unanimously approved a “resolution of intent” to start the process for implementing a Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program in the Westgate area.

The council also set a public hearing for the Aug. 16 council meeting to receive feedback on the idea.

So what exactly would the program do?

During the July 26 council meeting, Patrick Doherty, the City of Edmonds’ Economic Development and Community Services Director, explained that the Washington State Legislature created a Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program in 1995. The aim “was to help spur redevelopment in lagging urban centers that have been designated by cities to fulfill GMA (Growth Management Act) goals, thereby reducing sprawl and promoting smart growth” Doherty said.

The Edmonds City Council approved a plan in April 2015 to rezone the Westgate commercial area to include taller buildings and mixed residential/commercial use. At the time of passage, officials noted it would probably be years before such redevelopment occurred, since the rezoning applies only to new development, and many of the existing businesses are well-established.

Implementing a Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program (MFTP) could speed up the process, by providing developers and investors with an incentive to come to the Westgate area, Doherty said.

“There can be many challenges transforming the older, auto-age, low-density strip center-type development into more mixed-use type neighborhoods that we envision in our plans,” Doherty said. These barriers — including unwilling property sellers who need to aggregate multiple properties and existing long-term leases — “can really stall the transformation to mixed-use centers for decades,” Doherty said.

During his presentation, Doherty also noted that it’s more difficult for smaller cities to compete with higher-rent metropolitan areas like Seattle and Bellevue for development dollars, because developers receive a higher return on their investment in those areas.

The Multi-Family Tax Exemption Program has already been implemented by cities statewide — including Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood and Shoreline — and Doherty said he’s heard that the incentives do make a difference.

Many developers have come to see the MFTP as “a necessary tool to help overcome the challenges of urban redevelopment in all the highest-rent housing markets,” he added.

Under state law, the program is applicable to projects containing at least four dwelling units. It exempts the residential improvement value — the value of the residential portion of the project — only. “The nonresidential portion — usually meaning the commercial part — is not exempt and the land value is not exempt,” Doherty said. State law provides two options for exemption periods, eight years or 12 years. The 12-year exemption period is available only if the project includes at least 20 percent affordable housing — defined as units available for rent or purchase “to low- or moderate- income households,” he explained.

“There is no increase in taxes to taxpayers,” Doherty said. “Even though a project may be partially exempt for property taxes during the exemption period, existing taxpayers see no additional burden. Exempted taxes simply do not accrue during the exemption period. Upon completion of the exemption period, the entire project is taxed in full,” he said.

Now that the council has approved a resolution of intent to start the MFTP program, next comes the public hearing during the Aug. 16 city council meeting. Following that hearing, if the council decides it wants to continue with the program, city staff will come back in a few months with program details for council discussion and approval, Doherty said.

You can see the Power Point from the July 26 meeting here.

— By Teresa Wippel

  1. This is pathetic. Trying to speed up the development of Westgate? Really? Why? Providing tax exempt status to Developers? Isn’t this kind of ‘cutting off your nose to spite your face’? Comparing the City of Edmonds to MLT or Lynnwood? Completely different communities. Edmonds has an actual Downtown area with History, Businesses, events and activities. These other Communities (and I am not putting them down by any means) do not have any of this. I see the writing on the wall here. The ‘Leaders’ of our fair City are no different than the ‘Leaders’ of our Country it seems. It does not appear that they care anything about the Citizens of Edmonds. They only care about collecting tax incentives from the State for increasing population numbers and it doesn’t matter who that ‘Population’ is made up of. Edmonds, according to some reports, is the heroin Capital of the Puget Sound area and the increase in the Transient Population around town seems to support that. The way this City is being run (or run down), it will not be long before the Population that actually want to live in a nice Community where they feel safe and can raise their Families or live the rest of their life in a comfortable Home that they worked hard to pay for, will be moving on leaving their Homes and Property to be ahem, ‘Developed’ into a Low Income Mecca. I really feel that these decisions should NOT be made behind closed doors with no record of what has transpired until it is too late to change anything, but should instead be put to the Citizens for a vote and let the People who live in and Love Edmonds make those decisions. Does any Edmonds Citizen really want to see the City become a ‘Transient Community’? Where the only people who live here will be Low Income and/or Temporary Citizens? People who will live here for a couple of years until they save enough money to buy a Home in a place that is “a nice Community where they feel safe and can raise their Families or live the rest of their life”? Gee! That used to be Edmonds……

  2. Home values are up, the economy is performing, Point Edwards building 10 is in motion, condos are springing up all along 104/Esperance. What was true in recent years may not be true now, so why throw developers such a big, juicy bone? And assuring me it won’t touch my taxes is a red herring, of course it shouldn’t, but it deprives our town of needed taxes from these developments. If they want to build in the community, then contribute taxes to its well-being. If there was any chance that a developer would put more thoughtful design or better product and quality into their build because of a tax exemption, then I might be in favor of it, but that’s just a fantasy. It’s all about minimum investment for maximum return and now the town has just negotiated against itself based on old data and comparing apples to oranges. In lieu of more information to persuade me otherwise, I’m frustrated and disappointed by this news.

    1. Also: “Doherty said he’s heard that the incentives do make a difference.” So, anecdotal evidence only? Where’s the data?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.