For the second year, members of Edmonds-Woodway High School’s Students Saving Salmon club delivered an update to the Edmonds City Council regarding stream quality in Edmonds — and the news was mostly good.
The club, formed in 2014, has been continuing its efforts — under the name of the Edmonds Stream Team — to perform monthly monitoring of Edmonds streams, led by retired fisheries biologist and Edmonds resident Joe Scordino.
On Tuesday night, a group of seven club members provided highlights of their 17-page report, summarizing their work to collect water samples at Willow, Shell and Shellabarger Creeks and the Edmonds Marsh. The goal? Providing data on how stormwater and other runoff may affect the ability of the streams to protect salmon.
“The reason all of us participate in these activities is so that we can work towards the goal of re-establishing salmon runs, which are so vital to the environment throughout Edmonds,” club member Erin Francisco said during her council introduction.
The Stream Team samples are analyzed by an accredited water analysis laboratory that tests for metals, petroleum products and other pollutants. You can read the entire report with their findings here.
“This year Willow, Shell and Shellebarger Creek all have good water quality that was suitable for salmon,” said club member Taylor Blevins, who summarized the results. Most of the marsh “conformed to the necessary water quality standards to be a safe environment for salmon,” she added. However, the marsh edges have low dissolved oxygen levels and in some months had more acidic waters, and in the summer months, the middle of the marsh displayed higher temperatures — all factors that aren’t good for salmon, she said. Possible solutions include increasing freshwater circulation by opening the tide gates, as well as increasing marsh vegetation.
An area of concern, Blevins added, is the discovery of some carcinogenic pollutants –found mainly in the marsh — that exceed state standards and require further investigation to determine the source.
In addition to continuing their Stream Team monitoring, the students during the 2016-17 school year launched a stewardship program to work with residents along lower Shell Creek, explained club member Joe Cooper. The students went door to door, handing out information to 28 homes so that homeowners could identify what kind of salmon were in the stream and what they could do to protect the habitat.
Following that effort, the students made arrangements with several homeowners to conduct streamside restoration projects on their properties. Using a grant from Sound Salmon Solutions, the students over their spring break planted 320 native shrubs at four residences long Shell Creek. The club plans to do a similar planting with 80 shrubs next to Holy Rosary Church in the fall, Cooper said.
In late May, club members released 800 juvenile Coho salmon from the Willow Creek Salmon Hatchery into lower, middle and upper Shell Creek.
“The reason that’s a big deal is because salmon currently are unable to reach the upper reaches of Shell Creek because of barriers in the creek,” Cooper said, adding that the most significant of these is a waterfall near 7th and Glen in a property owner’s backyard. The Students Saving Salmon club is working with the property owner, the City of Edmonds and Trout Unlimited “to find a solution for removing that barrier and allowing salmon runs to reach the upper reaches of Shell Creek,” he said.
“We’d like thank everyone who’s helped us out the past few years and helped the club be so successful, and we hope we can rely on the continued support from the city and the community going forward,” Cooper said.
Also on Tuesday night, the council:
– Approved by a 4-3 vote an ordinance that will allow city projects — with mayoral approval — to operate more easily outside current noise restrictions of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily. Councilmembers Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Diane Buckshnis and Mike Nelson opposed the measure, while Councilmembers Kristiana Johnson, Tom Mesaros, Dave Teitzel and Neil Tibbott approved it. More details in our previous story here.
– Following public hearings during which no one testified, approved a draft updated plan for the city’s water system and water use efficiency, prepared by consulting firm Murraysmith. The water system plan now goes to the Washington State Department of Health for final review. The biggest capital expense identified in the plan was the replacement of Edmonds’ aging and undersized water mains, many of which are from the 1930s. Another significant expense will be the seismic retrofit of the 5 Corners reservoir.
– Had further discussion on proposed changes to Highway 99 development regulations with Development Director Shane Hope going through possible changes with the goal of making long-term improvements to land use and transportation. The council will continue to discuss the plan during two upcoming meetings: July 31 and Aug. 15.
– Approved a resolution to designate the Edmonds portion of Highway 99 as a “residential targeted area” in order to implement the multifamily tax exemption program for developers who include 20 percent affordable housing units. (The Edmonds City Council approved such a program for Westgate area development in August 2016.) The measure now goes to the council’s Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee for further discussion.
– Listened to Edmonds Mayor Dave Earling read a proclamation in honor of the 95th anniversary of the Edmonds Floretum Garden Club.
– Heard a report on a plan for historic informational panels for Yost Park and Sunset Avenue. The plan will be forwarded to the appropriate council committee for further consideration.
– Approved the process for appointments to the Tree Board, and confirmed all members.
– Approved the second quarter 2017 budget amendment.
At the close of the meeting, during the period reserved for councilmember comments, Councilmember Mike Nelson offered a stinging rebuke of fellow councilmembers who have recently expressed their opinions about council actions in local media outlets, which he says undermines the legislative process. While all councilmembers have ample opportunity to debate the issues and offer amendments during meeting deliberations, “once we vote, it is settled,” Nelson said. “It is the council’s decision. This whole body, the council, the city stand behind it. The executive branch, the mayor and the staff implement it.”
Lately, Nelson said, councilmembers “have taken it upon themselves to publicly call into question our fair process and seek to influence public opinion when they are on the losing side of a vote.”
While Nelson didn’t name the councilmembers, it appears he was referring to two recent opinion pieces, both of which ran in My Edmonds News: from Dave Teitzel on the council’s rejection of a candidate for the Edmonds Salary Commission, and from Neil Tibbott on the council’s approval of a resolution on the Paris Climate Accord.
“By these councilmembers’ actions, the legislative process seems to be a mere annoyance,” Nelson said
Nelson added that he knows what it’s like to be on “the losing end of a vote,” pointing to his opposition late last year to staffing cuts to the city’s fire stations, which the council approved by a 6-1 vote.
“I was very frustrated,” Nelson said. “But did I take to the airwaves to publicly criticize my colleagues’ decision? No. I moved on.”
“I will not sit quietly by while someone tries to block, prevent or hinder the decisions made by this council,” Nelson said.
Councilmember Neil Tibbott, who was next in line to offer his comments, said in response that his intention in writing his commentary “was not to criticize so much the process as it was to rally some support for an ongoing dialogue with citizens with regard to implementation” of the climate resolution.
“I’m sorry that it was taken that way,” Tibbott said. “My intention was to point out that this is an opportunity for citizens to now be involved.”
— By Teresa Wippel
Kudos to the students and their advisers, I read their report on the work they did.
Very impressive!
I totally disagree withCouncilmember Nelson. Often times, the first I hear of an issue is after the Council has already voted on it. I really appreciate the information and insights provided by Councilmemberd letters and/or editorials subsequent to these votes.
Please keep it up!
Great summary Teresa on the Students Saving Salmon! WOW, what a great written report summary and I wish there would have been more time. It would have been great if they would have been allowed more time, but overall, I was so pleased with the information and the power-point presentation. Special kudos to Sabrina Lou, Jared Yu, and Joe Cooper who were put on the spot by Council’s inquiry! It was also great to see Rondi Nordal again. BTW, the issue with the new increase in the PCH levels on the north side of the Marsh are now baseline data and the SSS will continue to investigate it further.
Thanks also to Joe Scordino, Val Stewart, Peggy Forman, Dave Millette and James Ogren who has really helped these students in getting grants and “steering the students” up the wonderful stream of understanding the environment and helping Edmonds be a better place.
I agree with Councilmember Nelson’s comments. Recent minority vote council members actions are obstructionism and a clear attempt to undermine the legislative process. Primary campaign talking points for council candidates in 2015 highlighted the need for collaboration over promoting personal agendas, including the need for a cooperative mindset. https://myedmondsnews.com/2015/06/tibbott-kicks-off-council-campaign-promising-leadership-that-gets-things-done/
What happened?
If I had voted to reject the salary commission applicant I would also want this issue to disappear from the press. It was an indefensible vote made only to support the lead taken by councilmember Fraley-Monillas – D’s supporting each other.
Thank you so much to the Edmonds Woodway students for their conducting research, helping citizens, and working on the sites to create healthy waters for the salmon. Each student is so impressive taking up a cause and following through.