Changes would strengthen railroads’ oil spill response efforts

312
1
Photo courtesy Washington Department of Ecology.

Railroad lines stretch across thousands of miles in Washington, often along pristine rivers and shorelines of the state. An oil spill from a train could pose a significant threat not only to the environment but to people and local economies. That’s why in 2015, Washington began requiring railroad companies to have oil spill contingency plans to ensure they are adequately prepared in case of a spill.

After several years of implementing the initial regulation, the Department of Ecology is proposing updates, based on direction from the Washington Legislature, to streamline requirements and strengthen response to potential railroad spills.

Ecology proposes to:

  • Enhance readiness requirements for oils that may weather and sink when spilled.
  • Improve ability to rescue and rehabilitate wildlife that may be affected or oiled during a response. Ensure that the railroad response teams are trained and well qualified to manage a response in Washington.
  • Update oil spill drill requirements.
  • Streamline plans for small rail lines that don’t move crude oil, with requirements that are in line with the size and scope of their operations.

Legislation driving the changes is included in 2017’s ESHB 1136 and 2018’s E2SSB 6269.

Ecology invites the public to weigh in on these changes through July 22, 2019. Ecology is hosting a public hearing for this rule proposal in an online meeting July 10 at 6 p.m. and an in-person meeting in Seattle July 11 at 1 p.m.

You can join the online meeting July 10 from computer, tablet, or smartphone with internet connection. Dial in by phone: +1 (646) 749-3122, Access Code: 123-020-765

The in-person meeting July 11 is at the Hilton Seattle Airport & Conference Center, 17620 International Blvd., Seattle.

For full information about dates and times, visit Ecology’s Oil Spill Contingency Plan – Railroad website.

One Reply to “Changes would strengthen railroads’ oil spill response efforts”

  1. “in 2015, Washington began requiring railroad companies to have oil spill contingency plans”
    …but we don’t think they have a contingency plan to unblock a crossing when it’s the only emergency access route?

    Ignored

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *