Edmonds School Board considers removing SROs from schools, celebrates Superintendent McDuffy’s retirement

The Edmonds School District Board of Directors celebrated Superintendent Kris McDuffy, who is retiring after 37 years in public education. (Courtesy of the Edmonds School District)

Recent discussions regarding race and police brutality toward people of color have renewed Edmonds School District officials’ conversation about whether to continue the district’s practice of having a police officer on school campuses.

At the Edmonds School Board’s June 9 business meeting, the board of directors had a lengthy discussion on whether the district should renew contracts with local law enforcement to provide police officers  — known as school resource officers or SROs — on high school campuses. Instead, the board would take time to review whether having SROs on campuses is in the best interest of students’ safety.

The board opened the discussion by reading public comments submitted by parents and community members both imploring the district to remove SROs from school campuses and supporting the program in the name of students’ safety.

In her submitted comment, district speech pathologist Melissa Petersen said SROs are more likely to arrest students of color rather than having those students be disciplined by school administrators. She also said that there is little to no evidence that having police on campuses decrease on-campus violence or prevent school shootings.

“I hope that the school board will listen to our community members of color, our Black leaders, and our indigenous neighbors, and end all contracts with police departments to host SROs on Edmonds School District campuses,” she said.

Recently, a petition requesting that the district immediately cancel its contracts with local law enforcement agencies to staff schools with SROs has circulated among parents and has more than 900 signatures. One petitioner, Edmonds resident Jeanne Petty, suggested that the district invest in more counselors instead of police.

“In the midst of all this we see cities and school districts around the country acknowledging that this is the correct path forward and making bold moves to shift funding away from policing and towards other services that keep our communities safe and serve all of our students and families,” she said.

However, Lynnwood resident Catrin Riggs said removing SROs would leave students vulnerable to danger from threats both in and out of schools. Additionally, Riggs said that student relationships with law enforcement could benefit from SROs. 

“Instead of disconnecting from local police, we should bring members of the police departments into our schools to dispel the fears, the backlash, and the blame,” she said. “We should work to heal the heartache of the tragic incidents, and include police in our kids’ experiences, so that they understand and appreciate the true purpose of police.”

The SRO program is set up through an interlocal agreement between the district and local law enforcement agencies, which define the SRO’s role at the school. Currently, Lynnwood, Meadowdale, Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds-Woodway high schools have SROs. Involved agencies include the Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office and the Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace police departments. 

This is not the first time the board has had requests to discontinue the SRO program. Last year, a new SRO was proposed for Scriber Lake High School in Edmonds and the district received pushback from parents and students from the neighboring Edmonds Heights K-12 school.

Both are alternative schools located on the former Woodway High School campus, with Edmonds Heights serving elementary- through high school-age students who do their studies both at home and at school. Scriber Lake, meanwhile, is a grade 9-12 high school that has many at-risk and special-needs students.

Because the police officers are armed, parents expressed concerns about the trauma that some children — and even some adults — will experience when seeing a gun in a school setting, and whether students of color would be treated fairly given the level of disproportionate discipline already occurring for students of color in the district.

At the Tuesday night meeting, the board discussed whether the district should renew contracts — set to expire at the end of this month — with the Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace police departments. A 60-day notice from the date of board-voted approval is required to terminate the contracts. During the discussion, the decision not to renew the contracts had general favor from the board.

Before making a decision, the board debated whether more information was needed to make a decision on canceling the program. Director Nancy Katims suggested that the board conduct a survey asking high school students how safe having an SRO on campus makes them feel.

“The kids are the stakeholders here,” she said. “They’re the ones who see the SROs everyday (and) they’re the ones who either benefit or don’t benefit from the SROs being there.”

However, Director Carin Chase pointed out that the board has already received feedback from parents and students regarding the SRO program during board meetings and community forums.

“I think it’s very important to acknowledge that our communities of color have stepped up and have given us input,” she said.

The board also has other factors to consider before eliminating the program. Unlike other schools that have contracts with city police department, Lynnwood High School’s contract is with the Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office due to the campus being located in unincorporated Snohomish County. Additionally, Director Gary Noble said the school has a higher response time due to its proximity from law enforcement agencies. Before terminating the contract, Noble said the district should have a safety plan in place in the event of an emergency at the school.

“I have no problem suspending the SRO program at Lynnwood, but I don’t want to do it until there’s a safety plan in place to replace it,” he said.

The board will hold a study session June 16 via Zoom to allow students and parents an opportunity to provide additional feedback on the SRO program before voting at its June 23 business meeting on whether to renew the two contacts.

In other business, the board unanimously voted to approve the following:

– an agreement between the district and the Foundation for Edmonds School District to allow the foundation to maintain a physical presence at the Educational Services Center.

– two public works contracts for baseball field and tennis court improvements at Meadowdale and Edmonds-Woodway high schools.

– appointing representatives to complete an application for federal and/or state disaster assistance to fund the district’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. 

– a request by the district’s English Learners (EL) Department to purchase a three-year contract for Ellevation Data software. District staff said the software ensures that the key data needed to meet diverse program requirements are in one convenient place.

Also during the meeting, the board bid farewell to Superintendent Kris McDuffy who announced her retirement in August after leading the district since 2016.

Board President Deborah Kilgore praised McDuffy’s work with the district, which included passing a race and equity policy, diversifying the workforce, updating the curriculum and refreshing several outdated policies.

“It takes a lot to make changes in a big district and (McDuffy) has made a lot of significant progress in several areas,” she said. “There are many elements of our complex district that are better now than how (she) found them.”

Staff presented a video celebrating McDuffy’s 37-year career in education, which can be viewed here. The tribute video featured photos as well video messages from McDuffy’s colleagues who sent well wishes and shared memories about their time working with her.

Former-Executive Director of Equity and Public Relations Dr. Kimberlee Armstrong — who was recently named assistant superintendent of educational services for Tamalpais Union High School District in northern California — said McDuffy inspired her to be a better person and helped her during times when she experienced racial injustice.

“I think it was the first time in my entire career in public education where I felt 100% comfortable in my own skin sharing about some of the feelings that I was having in that moment,” she said. “Aside from being a wonderful instructional leader, an amazing person, a thoughtful and caring and a kind human, she is accepting and she inspires.”

–By Cody Sexton

14 Replies to “Edmonds School Board considers removing SROs from schools, celebrates Superintendent McDuffy’s retirement”

  1. So, the Edmonds School Board “might” be participating in a new Social Experiment: no Police Officers at the schools! What could go wrong? You are considering using OUR children in your new liberal experiment? You call this leadership?


  2. I encourage the ESD to carefully discern the decision of whether or not to have SROs at the schools. What problem are you trying to solve by removing SROs from schools? How will separating people (SROs and students/staff) from each other help build relationships? If you don’t have contact with people of different sorts (career, backgrounds, culture, experiences, etc.), how can you get to know them as individuals? I know that my son has spoken to the SRO at his school and has learned a lot about him. That’s another adult in his life that can be a point of support at school. And as I understand it, the SROs are carefully screened and I believe volunteer to participate at the school.


    1. SRO’s are great for tons of reasons. I talked with a SRO officer a few months ago and after that discussion I was even more convinced it is a great program. Hopefully we will look at the problem we are trying to solve now and compare it with the problem we were trying to solve when we created the program in the beginning.


  3. If children and I mean K12 and lower have an issue with police officer’s and their conduct, 99.9% of the time it is because of images they see on their screens or their parents.

    SRO’s are the best way for children to understand the Police are the first place to go, NO MATTER WHAT!

    I would be interested to know if there are statistics for Edmonds specifically, relating to number of contacts by law enforcement per (month/year/decade) vs. reports of excessive violence or racial complaints.


  4. This is “Cutting off your nose to spite your face”, a needlessly self-destructive over-reaction to a problem.


    1. I don’t know. To me it seems the trend now to appear “woke” and “progressive” by proclaiming one’s disdain for law enforcement. That is, until you need them. I witnessed the school board meeting last night and there were numerous commentors who quipped about “studies” and “statistics” that in reality were (at best) misinterpreted or (at worst) outright fabrications. However, stating the removal of the SRO program is “a needlessly self-destructive over reaction to a problem” probably sums it up best.


  5. I see no value in an armed police officer in a school. Parkland showed us that they don’t protect against school shooters. Children get into fights. Children get petty issues amongst each other. And children will lie about each other. The absolute WORST way to handle these problems is to start by invoking the justice system. It is also important to know that because of how vulnerable the K-12 demographic is, it would be incredibly easy for an SRO to abuse their position, and terrify children into not seeking help. Repeated cases of police officers not having justice done against them shows that even if a child sought help against an abusive SRO, it is likely nothing would be done. We have evidence that shows that early interactions with the justice system tend to lead to imprisonment in the future. In an environment such as the one in Edmonds, I see no value in having law enforcement permanently on campus.


    1. If simply having SRO’s on campus is the problem why is it that all the school mass shootings take place at “good” schools and not the “bad” schools where there is heightened security?

      What happened in Parkland had far more to do with their swinging door policy to “reduce” crime at the school than SRO’s. Going from memory here someone please correct me if I am wrong, but there was all of one SRO on a multi acre campus of 3300 students stretched across a dozen buildings. It would be more likely that only more not less SRO’s could have prevented that incident. But even more effective would have been to take harsher action in the dozens of interactions the suspect had with the legal system prior to the shooting.


    2. 1. Who in the Edmonds School District SRO program “abused their position”.
      2. Also, please share what evidence (stated in the “we” portion of your comment) that early interactions “tend to lead to imprisonment in the future”. I offer the study published in the 2018 National Academies Press entitled “Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities” that states the exact opposite of what you are claiming.


  6. A silly and dangerous idea. There are no facts or data to support contention that in ESD #15 school resource officers arrest black students due to racial profiling. Just hype, not truth. Arrest of any students by SRO’s is rare event. SRO presence is preventative of some potential student on student violence and/or student on teacher violence. Some of our schools do have gangs and drug dealing. More peaceful contact between students and SRO’s is a positive unless you just hate police (like some do).


  7. SRO’s are so big in schools. They are important in making friends with the students and have a calming and security with the SROs. The personal “getting to know.,” the students and the SRO as well.
    I volunteer for EVERETT PD and I have a lot of conversations. They love their jobs and have some interesting stories. Not an easy job to just sign up! They are Interviewed and must be run through a panel before their assigned.
    SRO’s have a great rapport with the students and teachers. I don’t recall if COLUMBINE had a SRO or not.


  8. Kashf Iqbal
    1. Who in the Edmonds School District SRO program “abused their position”.
    2. Also, please share what evidence (stated in the “we” portion of your comment) that early interactions “tend to lead to imprisonment in the future”. I offer the study published in the 2018 National Academies Press entitled “Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities” that states the exact opposite of what you are claiming.


  9. I don’t see a safe place a school, especially high school without cops. I have always found peace in my heart knowing that they are around, and having my kids were a cop can’t go to protect the kids if something goes wrong it would be a nightmare for me.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.