The much-debated Edmonds City Council Code of Conduct draft got a new lease on life Tuesday night when the council agreed to form a subcommittee to study the matter further.
The vote was 4-3, with Councilmembers Laura Johnson (who drafted the proposed document), Luke Distelhorst, Susan Paine and Adrienne Fraley-Monillas voting yes. The three councilmembers on the losing end — Diane Buckshnis, Vivian Olson and Kristiana Johnson — were unsuccessful in attempting to postpone creation of the subcommittee indefinitely.
The council did approve a motion by Buckshnis –on a 4-3 vote with Olson, Kristiana Johnson and Susan Paine also voting yes — to have the subcommittee appointed by the council, rather than by the council president. Buckshnis said her intent was to ensure balanced subcommittee representation and thus avoid what she described as the council’s frequent pattern of 4-3 votes — and instead have a code of conduct that can be supported by the entire council.
Distelhorst disputed Buckshnis’ characterization of the 4-3 vote pattern, stating “I don’t think it’s appropriate to continually refer to 4s and 3s. We have seven independent councilmembers who all have independent brains and can vote independently, and I would like that to be respected please.”
Buckshnis and Councilmember Kristiana Johnson also stressed the importance of reviewing background material — including the council’s current Code of Conduct, passed in 2013 — as part of the subcommittee’s work.
Councilmembers agreed to delay until next week further discussion about how many members the committee would have, and the council’s process for appointing them.
Also Tuesday night, the council heard an update on various activities of the city’s Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department, and also a proposal for a new program aimed at providing an on-site recreation program for elementary-age students.
Summarizing capital projects underway, Department Director Angie Feser noted that construction is continuing on the 26,000-square-foot Edmonds Waterfront Center, with completion set for October. This project — a partnership with the Edmonds Senior Center — includes a city project to restore the beachfront next to the center, a renovated walkway and parking lot. Feser also said that the city is revisiting next steps for the Civic Park project, which received two bids that were well over the engineer’s estimate. The plan is to rebid the project in early 2021, she said. As for Marina Beach Park, the city is in the middle of preparing two $500,000 grant applications from the State’s Recreation and Conservation Office.
Feser also talked about how COVID-19 has impacted park operations, noting that the priority has been public and staff safety, sanitation and preservation of city assets. The city has followed federal, state and county guidelines in determining when to reopen facilities, she said. While all parks, trails and open spaces are open to the public “and heavily used,” playgrounds are still closed. Yost Pool and the Hazel Miller spray pad didn’t open this year. The parks maintenance crews are working staggered shifts and no longer work in pairs, and the city has had no coronavirus outbreaks among maintenance staff, she said. To address increased sanitation needs due to COVID, the city is now cleaning its public restrooms twice a day.
As for the proposed recreation program, it’s called LEAP (Learning Enhancement & Activity Program) and would repurpose the Frances Anderson Center to support children entering second through sixth grade. It would operate Monday – Friday from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m and would provide day camp activities while supporting Edmonds School District distance learning due to COVID-19. The proposal includes the hiring of two new staff, but would be covered by registration fees.
Because the start of the school year is just around the corner and new positions would need to be hired quickly, a vote on whether to approve this program was originally scheduled for Tuesday night. However, councilmembers agreed at the beginning of the meeting to delay action until next week.
According to Feser, city staff have identified nine classrooms inside the Frances Anderson Center — originally built as an elementary school –that would accommodate social distancing between children and staff. The proposal calls for grouping similar grade-level kids and staff into “weekly pods” in the classrooms. Room capacity varies from 10 to 24 and each room will have at least two staff members to provide a 1:10 staff/child ratio minimum. The city said this ratio allows better safety practices, facilitation of distance learning support and will provide the ability to keep pods isolated from one another as much as possible to reduce potential COVID exposure. It also helps contain any potential outbreak to just one pod.
The goal is also to keep the schoolchildren isolated from the other Frances Anderson tenants, which include a ballet school, a day care and a Montessori school, Feser said.
Supplemental programming would come from the city’s environmental education and cultural arts divisions as well as community partners like Sno-King Youth Club to provide additional day camp programming.
Weekly registration is $300 or $345 for non-residents, with need-based full scholarships available for a minimum of 20% of the participants. Program capacity is 100 participants.
There’s a need for these types of programs, as Edmonds has 3,052 students going into the 2nd-6th grades, Feser said. The program is also flexible enough that it could adjust “whether to proceed, modify or discontinue” if the school district decides, for example, to move away from remote learning.
In addition to hiring two recreation leaders for the program, the city will need to employ 18 full-time equivalent and four part-time equivalent employees for the program. One quarter to a third of those staff can be current city employees who have been laid off or working significantly reduced hours due to the COVID-19 outbreak. Staff would be hired as temporary employees until more information is known about the school district’s plans for remote learning, Feser said.
Councilmember Laura Johnson expressed enthusiasm for the idea, noting that child care has been identified as “a huge need” as parents scramble to determine how to continue working while their children are learning remotely. “I see this as helping parents who might otherwise not be able to work, or who might have to make the choice of leaving the kids at home in order to work. It gives the kids a safe place to go to. It creates jobs within our community,” and also restarts the city’s recreation programming, she said. Johnson encouraged the council to look at funding options that could expand the city’s ability to offer full scholarships to more than 20% of students.
Other councilmembers also signaled support for the idea, but requested that Feser supply more detailed information — including cost breakdowns — before they take a vote next week.
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson pointed out that “only 100 kids will be served by this program” out of 3,000-plus in Edmonds in that age group. “That’s only 3.3% of the students who will be served. So I think that we need to put that into context to understand while it’s a great program, it’s only a piece of the puzzle,” she said.
In other action, the council:
– Unanimously approved the city’s 2021-2026 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program.
– Vote to fund — via the council’s contingency budget — an information panel for the former Edmonds High School portico, now located at Salish Crossing. The 6-1 decision (Kristiana Johnson opposed) reversed a council vote taken in February 2020 to remove portico signage funds from the list of 2019 budget items carried into 2020. The information panel funding of up to $4,000 had originally been approved by a 5-2 vote last November. The goal of the panel will be to educate passersby about the significance of the 1909-era portico, which Salish Crossing developer Lindsey Echelbarger saved from the landfill when the former high school was remodeled to house the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Echelbarger funded construction of a support structure for the portico and placed it at the southeast corner of the Salish Crossing parking lot, with the idea of showcasing it as part of the city’s history.
– Agreed to place on next week’s consent agenda a compensation proposal for the council’s legislative/executive assistant, Maureen Judge, that includes an additional 32.56 hours of vacation to compensate her for a previously delayed wage increase.
— By Teresa Wippel
Councilmember Distelhorst:
When you start acting independently then perhaps that will be a characteristic of you that will be respected.
Your are way to late on you plan with less than two weeks before school starts , people have already lost jobs and the cost only a few will be able to afford it at these trying times.
So, in addition to hiring two recreation leaders for the program, the city will need to employ 18 full-time equivalent and four part-time equivalent employees for the program.
That is 20 full time people and 4 part-time people to serve just 100 children. Please tell us how paying 24 people is not going to cost the city anything? Especially if you don’t charge 20% of the children.
Could be something like this 100 kids, 20 free, 80 paid at $300 per week is $24,000 per week of revenue. Revenue per 24 people would be $1000 per week per employee. That’s around $5000 per day of rev for a 11 hour day or around $450/hr. All kids will not be the the full 11 hours so a full complement of staff will not be needed for the full 11 hours. Council has asked for more data and it likely will include: salary by job title, benefit calculations, overtime estimates, capital costs for WiFi and all the rest. I do not know where the city employees who work in the FAC current park but we would have an additional 24 people needing parking or bus or bikes. I would also guess the city has plans to improve drop off of kids, 100 more being dropped off and picked up morning and night. For each elementary school in ESD their is a lot of cars picking up and dropping off kids even with the bussing system they have. Typically for a new business we require a traffic study before they can open and a business is charged a mitigation fee as well.
Lots of details and that is probably Council asked for more information. If others have questions they want council to consider next week when they revisit this program they should list them for council.
The ESD took a dangerous choice in removing their previous choice of a hybrid school option to all remote. That puts an enormous, and unnecessary strain on many families. The city is right to step in when the ESD has failed. Although Kristina Johnson is correct that this only helps an incredibly small portion of students.
The Seattle Times had a very good article about how parents, including parents from Edmonds, are dealing with the stress. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/economy/for-many-families-school-online-means-tough-economic-choices/
We should be clear that this financial stress will put real health risks on many lower and middle class families that may be far worse than the impacts of the virus itself. For years now the ESD board has made decisions that have put our kids at risk. They have had to make cuts when no other district around us needed to, they have made critical decisions on SROs without listening to the students and families, and now they are unnecessarily putting the kids at risk by stumbling into a full year of distance learning without being ready for it whatsoever.
I agree that a program that helps 100 kids is good for those families that can afford it, but this is the ESD mess, and they should help to fix it. Select ESD schools should absolutely be made available for learning pods with students connecting to individual virtual sessions, so they can attend different classes, but kept together to reduce COVID spread risk and reduce staffing needs.
How is a decomissioned school building built in 1928 with up to 24 kids in a room using a mix of hours reduced employees from other areas of city government safe but multiple new ESD $35-50 million dollar facilities using professional teachers are not safe?
Once again, you are 100% correct Anthony. The ESD on their website stated that “We realize our decision not to have in-person learning opportunities at this time extends the hardship, uncertainty and equity gaps already imposed on many of our families. Please know we are working to address learning needs, childcare and other impacts of this difficult choice.” https://www.edmonds.wednet.edu/news/what_s_new/reopening_edmonds__schools_2020
However, when it came to actually following through on figuring out child supervision, ESD has an extremely limited capacity. Four elementary schools, out of 34 available schools in Edmonds, Lynnwood, and MLT will be used for limited child care options. For the city of Edmonds, the ESD has only allowed one YMCA program at Chase Lake Elementary
Also, they noted that “classrooms will not be able to be accessed by any child care providers as teachers MAY want to return to the classroom to record content.” So programs will only be limited to small sections of the public areas even if the teachers there state that they will not be using their classrooms until school returns.
Frankly, ESD took the extra step to make this much more difficult and dangerous on kids and their families, and they should be doing a lot more to help fix the mess that they created.
They should be using at least half of those schools for learning pods. Their decision to allow only a very small portion of ESD elementary school children to get elementary daycare while ignoring the needs of the rest of the district is a colossal failure for the ESD.
Why is it that with Covid numbers getting better ESD decided to further restrict and shift from Hybrid to all online? Are the teachers union bosses really that powerful, I guess the answer is yes when they say the public funded classrooms can only be used by union members. They were kind of stuck though, if they let the rooms be used its pretty hard to legitimately claim it is not safe to open the school.
At this point I say the cost of these daycares needs to come out of the ESD budget, its a farce that people are paying property taxes AND being forced to fund the cost of their kids free education.
Take a family of four with two working adults each making $20 an hour and two kids, that means they make about $80,000 a year before taxes. They should not qualify for one of the scholarships and ESD potentially wants to take around $20,000 from them. How does it make sense to even go to work?
Ah, new Council members, know thy leaders
1) While Creating the Wheel
Consult the MRSC Mayor & Council Handbook
Add It to the rest of the readily available information for the Council. The Handbook covers the relational topics Council Member Laura Johnson authored. However, the Handbook clearly and objectively states the roles of the parties and between parties including staff. Unlike Ms. Johnson’s ”update” the MRSC publication cites WA state legal requirements along with the Roberts Rules of Order, also considered laws, as the Edmonds City Council adopted the 11th edition and these rules supersede the code of conduct, updated or current.
2) While Heading to the Gallows (Humor)
Perhaps, save everyone time, so the city can get back to business, what is the end goal: accountability by voting to penalize the council members who may come across as less sentimental than others. However, again there are already documented sanctions available. Perhaps one or two want more authority to confront Council Members.. They may not have the precise scroll: for the jury to rule: If this, the stretcher, if that tar and feathers… Ooh hang and quarter… I heard she has a mole. No, they’re usually publicly drown or burnt…
But that’s ridiculous – Exactly!
3 Learn from History
Don’t get overly connected to the work, it may be for naught for President Monillads has overturned past Council Committee work. In one of her presidential terms with then council member and now Mayor Mike Nelson, in one meeting on June 2, 2015 in a matter of minutes, she surprised the ethics committee members with her own document and passed it.
http://edmondswa.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=12&ID=1668&Inline=True
As Ms Rasmusson states that tools are out there and it is not clear to me why now?
NOW is the time to stand up. Write a letter to the council members. Tell them that there are more important issues in our community that they should focus on.
Mark,
Thank you for encouraging citizens to write to their Councilmembers. Many of us wholeheartedly agree “that there are more important issues in our community that they should focus on”.
And thank you for your excellent LTE regarding the new Council Code of Conduct:
https://myedmondsnews.com/2020/08/letter-to-the-editor-updated-council-code-of-conduct-offers-a-policy-ripe-for-manipulation/
Lori, great remarks.
If the Council Members won’t listen directly or indirectly to their fellow Council Members, maybe they will listen to you. Here is easy access to their contact information:
Phone Email
Luke Distelhosrt: 425.361.3856 Luke.distelhorst@edmondswa.gov
Susan Paine: 425.361-8844 Susan.paine@edmondswa.gov
Laura Johnson: 425.361-8229 Laura.johnson@edmondswa.gov
Adrienne Fraley Monillas: 425.275.7558 Adrienne.monillas@edmondswa.gov
Lori,
Thanks for listing contact information for the four Councilmembers who continue to vote in support of Council President Fraley Monillas’ Council Code of Conduct.
Citizens can email comments to all Councilmembers at:
Council@edmondswa.gov
To ensure that your comments become part of the public record (included in the Council packet) also copy to:
Publiccomment@edmondswa.gov