Letter to the editor: Silencing free speech by breaking the law not what Edmonds is about

Editor:

Recently, My Edmonds News reported on the vandalism to the art installation that changed key characteristics of the message into an entirely new message altogether. The public was appropriately appalled, and legal action was pursued. Oscar Wilde is quoted as saying “I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself.” Service members have given their lives defending this freedom. All the people of Edmonds should be mindful, respectful, and display the true meaning of decorum when it comes to defending every citizen’s right to protected speech.

In local Facebook groups, discussion is abundant and emotionally charged about the theft of political signs and other signs reflecting individual beliefs. We might not agree, or even understand the messages on those signs and can become blinded by our own passion.  The use of a sign is a way to provoke thought, declare a strong personal belief, offer support. It is a sacred and protected right we as Americans enjoy and others in the world can only envy. Recently, many in Edmonds have had to resort to extreme measures to keep trespassers, enemies of free speech, and those who disagree from stealing yard signs. This week Councilmember Adrienne-Fraley Monillas used her position to make rhetorical and unproven statements during the Council Comments section of the Jan. 26, 2021 council meeting.    I will fight to protect her right to express her thoughts. She is perfectly within her rights to say the things that she does, and residents of Edmonds are perfectly within their rights to display legal signage on private property to express their views.

A case in point. Recently, I was asked to watch a neighbor’s property while they were away. They had multiple legal signs on their private property. Over the course of seven days, trespassers stole private yard signs no fewer than four times. Fortunately, in two of the cases, I was able to secure photographs of these individuals. I promptly filed a police report and provided the photographs.

The people stealing these signs (and silencing protected speech) need to be prosecuted and serve their penalty.

Whether you want to express Black Lives Matter, Drop the Mike, Equity, Justice, We Choose Kindness, or I Like Turtles signs on your private property is your business. If you dislike the sign, think about why that is and engage in a discussion with those you disagree with to understand their views and share yours. Using misleading speech and to emotionally divide our community as Councilmember Adrienne-Fraley Monillas is doing is both wrong and dangerous.

One thing most of us have in common is our love for this city. We have done our best work when we share ideas, opinions, and respect. Members of this community crave having a voice and a meaningful role in their future. History has taught us what we become when we seek to silence those with whom we disagree.

George Bennett
Edmonds

  1. Amazing George. There’s been so many signs the last couple years. Who are they put out for? I’m personally embarrassed for the people who feel the need to put so many signs out, especially if it is for the majority opinion. It feels like a mix of piety and insecurity. Being allowed to display whatever sign you want is more of a freedom of religion issue [as opposed to a freedom of speech issue] these days.

    The guy who painted the “T” on that trash on the fence both deserves a medal and a fine or community service. I don’t know. Is blasphemy protected speech too?

    1. Come on Matt, I am not sure if you are being sarcastic (you do that sometimes) or really believe what you are saying. Thought provoking dialogue is important. Signs accomplish that in some minor, but real way. Consider it yard it. If someone takes my yard art, I am going to be upset.

      1. I see insecurity when a society puts so many signs out. It looks religious to me. I even see false prophets like George Floyd.

        1. Matt I see barriers and insecurity bordering on religious. I don’t like it. Divide and conquer. Common purpose and common sense should rule the day. I still have hope. Though waining.

  2. Interesting topic. I personally disagreed with the rioting all summer but supported the right of expression posed by the sign and opposed the tampering. Then again, I didn’t approve of the use of public property or government endorsement. The government should be extremely careful, if not totally abstain from, trying to speak for an entire city.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.