State Legislature considering bills that would change policing

Equity, race, policing and social justice: The nationwide debate has come to Edmonds. The city’s search for a new police chief, the Equity and Social Justice Task Force report and an upcoming police department audit have quickly sharpened that debate locally. 

Rep. Lillian Ortiz-Self

State Rep. Lillian Ortiz-Self, who represents the 21st District that includes Edmonds, put it this way: “This is probably the safest place I have ever lived.” But, she said, “systemic racism is built into our systems; the system was not made to work for everyone and those outside it struggle to fit in and struggle to succeed.”

 In January, Edmonds Mayor Mike Nelson’s Equity and Social Justice Task Force published a report sharply critical of the Edmonds Police Department. Among the criticisms, the report states that “it is clear that bias and diversity training is not a priority of the department or seen as a relevant need.”

The report said: “There is a lack of understanding of social justice terminology and concepts, multicultural competency, white privilege, structural racism, restorative justice and more.”  From another section, the report said: “The officers interviewed, and department overall do not have a clear understanding of the community they serve.”

Mayor Mike Nelson

Earlier this week, My Edmonds News Publisher Teresa Wippel asked Mayor Mike Nelson about the task force’s view on policing in Edmonds. “We have this systemic issue,” Nelson said. “So, if we are trying to find systemic remedies, if we are trying to change how we police, how we do community policing, and they (the task force) are saying these are some things you should try, what is the harm in doing that?”

Acting Police Chief Jim Lawless

The task force interviewed Edmonds Police Acting Chief Jim Lawless, Sergeants Josh McClure and Aaron Greenmun and Detective Julie Govantes. Lawless has not issued any public statement about the report. But before it was released, in a message announcing he would not be applying for the permanent chief’s job, he said the following: “The most diverse department in our city has continued to do their job at an exceptionally high level this past year, no matter what has been put in front of them. As women and men of color, diverse ethnicities and religions, and members of the LGBTQ community, our staff is representative of those we so proudly serve, our community.”

In Olympia, state lawmakers are also looking at changes to policing. The state Legislature is working on police reforms that, if passed, will affect how Edmonds cops do their jobs.

Four bills on police use of force are now in the works:

1. Senate Bill 5066 has passed the State Senate and is now in committee in the House, as of March 5. This bill would require:

  • officers to intervene when they witness another officer engaging in the use of excessive force. 
  • an officer who observes wrongdoing to report it their supervisor. 
  • Police agencies to adopt written policies on the duty to intervene and ensure statewide training at the Criminal Justice and Training Commission.

2. House Bill 1054 has passed the House and is now in committe in the Senate, as of March 5. It would prohibit chokeholds, neck restraints, tear gas, no-knock warrants, use of military gear.

3. House Bill 1310 is ready for a full House vote, as of March 5. If it passes, it goes to the Senate. It would require use of

  • de-escalation tactics and alternatives to deadly force. 
  • limit the use of deadly force to very narrow circumstances where there is an imminent threat of serious physical injury or death.

4. House Bill 1267 has passed the House and on the way to the Senate, as of March 5. It would reate within the Governor’s office, a unit to investigate potential criminal use of deadly force by officers. That includes officer involved in-custody deaths or sexual assaults.

Another measure sparking debate is Senate Bill 5051. The bill would give Washington’s Criminal Justice and Training Commission the power to investigate police misconduct and revoke or suspend a police officer’s ability to serve. That shifts the oversight of police misconduct of cases from local departments to the state and gives the commission the power to decertify officers; to take away their badge and gun forever.

The commission has never had the staff or the powers to decertify. The Seattle Times last year reported that “Washington has never decertified an officer for using excessive force. Instead, officers with long histories of misconduct have been able to move from department to department.” SB5051 has passed the State Senate and is headed to the House.  

Acting Chief Lawless only commented briefly on the bills in Olympia: “We continue to follow the ongoing discussions of the Legislature pertaining to criminal justice issues at both the state and federal levels,” he said. “It is all very fluid and some of the legislation is rapidly evolving as a result of those ongoing discussions and negotiations.”

Ross Sutton, the president of the Edmonds Police Officers Association, referred My Edmonds News to the Washington Council of Police and Sheriffs (WACOPS) for any comment on the bills. WACOPS has said it either supports or is “neutral” on all the reform bills except for SB5051 on police misconduct investigations.  

The council says the impact of that bill on officers could “be dramatic and unjust,” eliminate an officers’ due process, could lead to termination before any decision is made on misconduct and will undermine officers’ ability to defend themselves. The statement, sent to state senators, adds that “we believe suspension and probation are best handled at the local level.” 

Rep. Strom Peterson

 State Rep. Strom Peterson (D-21st District), who represents Edmonds, said he favors a lot of what is in the bills. “One of the core nuggets of what we’re dealing with now is that we have treated these communities as ‘others’ for decades,” he said. “Until we become honest with ourselves that this is happening, then we still have a very segregated society because of the way things were written for a couple hundred years.” 

Rep. Ortiz-Self is also a member of the Washington State Commission on Hispanic Affairs. “Racial equity is at the forefront,” she told My Edmonds News. “Policing bills, and diving deeply into communities to talk with police, talk with communities of color is important; trying to bring everyone together, to fill in gaps and support law enforcement too.”  At the end of the day, Ortiz-Self said, the goal is to create trust and feel safe.

 The police reform bills are all still under consideration. The deadline for lawmakers to act on them is March 7.

To learn more about any of this legislation, including sponsors, a synopsis, and fiscal note, visit the Washington State Legislature’s bill information webpage:
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo.

— By Bob Throndsen

12 Replies to “State Legislature considering bills that would change policing”

  1. For those of us forced to frequent Seattle, we can warn Edmonds where this road leads. The bigger question is why our leaders are so intent on taking us there? Get out and talk to your neighbors. Are we really the people we are accused of being? What neighborhood do these horrible people live in? What is hiding behind this lie? Who is paying for it and what do they have to gain?

    Ignored

    1. Glen, you are so correct in your statement. We are allowing our politicians to March down the road with an agenda that will ultimately turn our wonderful city of Edmonds into a huge failure like “Seattle.” Olympia isn’t far behind. Our once vibrant cities are on life support wholly because of our local and state politicians and their extremely poor decisions. I pray our community wakes up in time before it is too late!

      Ignored

      1. Amen to that! Our woke politicians cave into the small loudly vocal mobs, who’s intent is to destroy cities and neighborhoods and reform them into some crazy Marxist utopia. Edmond please be aware, just look at Seattle.

        Ignored

  2. These are all correct. I wrote the reasons, how’s, why’s, and what to does but came back incorrectly as an error. It was good too T. Ha Deb

    Ignored

    1. The officers who responded to George Floyd’s overdose did everything possible to deescelate the situation.

      Ignored

  3. This is precisely why come election time Nelson, Distlehorst, AFM, etc need to be resoundingly voted out. Though when it comes to Nelson I would prefer immediate recall.

    Ignored

  4. The comments in the article are ridiculous. I am sure that there are some good pieces in this legislation. I also agree that there can be more training. The report was conducted in a vacuum with a small representation of the police force. That is a non-sequitur. Why wouldnt Strom pull the “nuggets” out of the legislation and strike the bad items? What legal razor blade are we going to make police officers sit on? Are they all going to need to carry personal liability insurance just in case someone else interprets what they did as wrong? I am interested in hearing and seeing what Strom calls “others” – who are these others? Does it include poor white people, drug addicts, or is it just POC’s that are considered other?

    More rhetoric by our elected officials. I mean after all, I agree that we should try things that have proven to be effective in other communities. So show me some data that proves that crime, trust, equity, and justice are increased – and then try those things. Otherwise, it is spitballing and posturing for the sake of political advancement. What systemic changes – SYSTEMIC, need to be made in local ordinances that promote equity and justice? I still am waiting on both the data and the detailed steps to get there, but it looks like we are going to hear more “stuff” that makes us all fuzzy and warm inside.

    Ignored

  5. Glen Nelson and George Bennet both made excellent comments. Nelson, Ortiz-Self and Peterson appear to have no perception of what it takes to be a Police Officer. No matter the amount of training, officers dealing with human beings will encounter situations that no training course could encompass and where a decision must be made in a nanosecond. They must have some protection under law for situations like that.

    Ignored

  6. Senate Bill 5066 and HB 1310 seems reasonable from the description provided. Officers should intervene if they think excessive force is being used, and deadly force obviously should be reserved for extreme circumstances.

    However, House Bill 1054 has the potential to be a disaster, and achieve the complete opposite from the intention. If you drastically limit all of the non lethal weapons and tactics from police, you are only going to be left with the lethal tools and hand combat. Which as you can expect, is obviously going to result in unnecessary casualties because the lawmakers did not think through the repercussions of their actions.

    As seen in Minneapolis, their defund policies there were intended to make the community safer, but instead they more than doubled the murder rate, and they had to backtrack after outcry from the community.

    Seattle is already going through a massive increase in crime because of their defund policies there. It will likely only change when enough of an increase in deaths and crime causes them to reconsider.

    Edmonds is in real danger of following some of the mistakes of Minneapolis and Seattle. Ideally there will be enough people that will encourage out elected leaders to not make self detrimental moves.

    Ignored

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identify before approving your comment.