From aquatics to trails to open space, residents weigh in on Edmonds parks planning

In ongoing work to update the city’s Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) plan, Edmonds parks officials and consultants hosted a virtual meeting Saturday to gather additional ideas from residents on their priorities for Edmonds parks system and recreation programs.

The six-year PROS plan is aimed at managing and enhancing Edmonds’ parks, open space, trails and recreation opportunities. The goal is to gather community input that will help guide the city’s assessment of its current parks system, develop project priorities and provide a foundation for pursuing grant opportunities.

Saturday afternoon’s online meeting drew an estimated 50 people, which included 11 city officials (staff, consultants and councilmembers).

Last summer, a total of 1,958 people responded to an online PROS plan community survey, with 99% of respondents stating that parks and recreation programs are essential to Edmonds’ quality of life, noted consultant Steve Duh. A total of 81% visited parks and recreation facilities a couple of times a month, with the vast majority (83%) headed to the beach/waterfront, he said.

Survey respondents also identified their priority improvements to the parks system, which included:

– Connect gaps in the trail system and expand trail connections.

– Improve or upgrade existing parklands.

– Buy more conservation and open space lands.

– Build an aquatic center.

– Improve restroom facilities.

Those responding to the survey expressed the highest interest in the city’s recreation activities and program options. These included:

1. Community events such as outdoor movies and Hazel Miller Plaza summer concerts.

2. Outdoor programs including Beach Rangers or environmental education.

3. Youth programs such as summer day camps, arts or gymnastics.

4. Youth sports programs and camps.

The city said it also heard from residents that they would like to see additional park investments in south and southeast Edmonds, and along the Edmonds section of Highway 99. During Saturday’s virtual meeting, consultants shared two maps: one that showed parkland access and distribution within the city limits, and the other that included the addition of county-operated parks, such as Southwest County Park and Esperance Park.

After receiving an overview of what the city has heard so far, those attending Saturday were invited to participate in a series of multiple-choice polling questions.

The first of these asked respondents to prioritize up to three areas of Edmonds that the city should priorities for parks investments during the next six to 10 years. The Highway 99 corridor and southeast Edmonds each received 81% of responses, with north Edmonds coming in third at 54%. Southwest Edmonds earned 42% of votes and downtown received 15%.

Next, attendees were asked to pick just one improvement they would make to the Edmonds parks system, out of the following amenities.

– Playground upgrades and replacement.

– Improved, permanent restrooms.

– Improved maintenance of existing parks.

– Picnic shelters and tables for gathering.

– Shade structures for playgrounds.

– Bike skills area or pump track.

– Additional community gardens.

Votes were divided among the choices, with additional community gardens the top choice at 30%, improved restrooms at 20% and playground upgrades and improved park maintenance tied at 17%. Of the remaining choices, picnic shelters earned 13% of the votes and a bike skills area got 3%. No one voted for playground shade structures.

 

Saturday meeting participants also were asked to share via Zoom comments their ideas for improving existing parks. Among the ideas:

– Increasing natural habitat, tree canopy and the ability to interact with nature. Tree canopy was mentioned as particularly important as climate change causes hotter temperatures.

– Underwater dive park maintenance.

– Expanded Yost Pool operations.

– Prioritizing the purchase of the Unocal property, currently undergoing environmental cleanup, next to the Edmonds Marsh.

– Better trail maintenance at Yost Park and in general increased accessibility and stewardship of current trails to help reduce off-trail traffic.

– Prioritizing the conservation needs of parks to address erosion problems, especially in Yost and Maplewood parks, and more emphasis on use of open space.

– Better irrigation monitoring overall to ensure lawns are not overwatered and muddy.

– More park benches in a covered area for the occasional rain shower.

– Functional toilets. “Porta-toilets are better than nothing at all,” one attendee said.

– Mountain bike locations with public education about where mountain biking is safe and permitted. “There is a lot of mountain biking activity on small trails in Yost Park, and people are unclear as to whether this is a permissible activity,” a meeting attendee said. Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Angie Feser noted that city code does not prohibit the use of bikes in parks.

– Possible interlocal agreements with Snohomish County to improve amenities at Esperance Park and with the City of Mountlake Terrace regarding better access to Ballinger Park.

In another polling question, attendees were asked to share their opinions about what the city should consider in addressing residents’ desire for additional parks and recreation events and programs. The choices included:

– More big events, like the Edmonds Arts Festival.

– More medium-sized events, such as outdoor movies.

– More small, neighborhood-focused events, such as concerts in neighborhood parks.

– Don’t change anything — keep the existing range and variety of events.

– A fill-in-the blank option for addiitonal ideas.

Of those responding, 41% said they would prefer more small, neighborhood events, while 25% said don’t change anything. More medium-sized events were selected by 16% of those responding while 6% said they would like more big events. An additional 13% offered a range of fill-in-the-blank ideas, including a focus on Edmonds’ International District and Highway 99 events.

The polling then shifted to aquatics and pool use. The issue, noted consultant Steve Duh, is that Edmonds’ outdoor Yost Pool is 50 years old and facing maintenance challenges. A 2009 City of Edmonds Aquatic Feasibility Study suggested replacing Yost Pool, and the community has expressed an interest over the years in having an aquatics center. If Yost were replaced, should that replacement be a small, local pool or a large regional pool, and should it be indoor or outdoor?

Yost Pool

Duh then went through the price point for each option.

Replacing Yost with a similar-scale outdoor pool would cost between $4 million and $6 million. An indoor “local-scale” pool might cost $15 million to $20 million. A regional-scale outdoor pool would cost between $10 million to $12 million, although some of the cost could be offset by visitors from areas who would pay admissions or class fees. An indoor regional pool (similar to the City of Lynnwood’s pool) could cost $30 million to $40 million.

In Saturday’s polling, 39% favored a local-scale indoor pool, while 36% chose a local-scale outdoor pool. A total of 18% wanted a regional-scale outdoor pool and just 6% voted for a regional-scale indoor facility.

The final polling question focused on trails and connections, which included trails, paths and bikeways. The question asked what respondents saw as the most important options for improving trails in Edmonds, with instructions to select all that applied.

 

There were a range of choices expressed, with 46% desiring the construction of new, connecting trails in existing parks and open spaces, 40% preferring the aquisition and construction of new trail corridors through purchase of land or easements, and 31% preferring two other options: improving maintenance of existing trails and using street rights-of-way and sidewalks to improve connectivity. A total of 37% said they viewed all of the options as important.

At the end of the meeting, Feser share next steps, noting that the city plans to complete a draft PROS plan by the end of 2021, with plan review and adoption by the Edmonds City Council anticipated in early 2022. To learn more or leave additional comments on the plan, visit the city’s parks planning webpage or email PROSPlan@edmondswa.gov.

— By Teresa Wippel

All graphics and photos courtesy City of Edmonds

3 Replies to “From aquatics to trails to open space, residents weigh in on Edmonds parks planning”

  1. So, a total of 50 attended, minus the 11 staff and elected. 39 residents. All able to access the meeting on broadband and via Zoom or phone. Pretty select group and self selected as well. Didn’t want any of the pool options, not a choice. How on earth does this zoominar count for anything related to residents actually would like to see? Parks are important and valuable resources. Consultants make a lot of money and yet relying on push polls via zoominars and the input from 39 tech equipped folks? Not even statistically significant. Send out a questionnaire to all residents, postage return paid and get some real representative input. Zoominars, although cheap to use, are not a replacement for actual surveys of our residents.

    Ignored

  2. I am hoping that the new land left to to Edmonds will at least partly be used for community garden patches. There are already fruit trees there.

    Ignored

  3. I would take issue if decisions were made off the opinions of only 36 people when ~2000 filled out the original survey. Especially since these questions should have been assessed in the survey to begin with. Hopefully it was just an exercise in public opinion and the survey will carry more weight than the zoom poll.

    Ignored

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.