Letter to the editor: Budgeting for what we need, not what we want

Editor:

I had previously posted a letter to the editor about prioritizing between sidewalks and bike lanes and received many great comments (thank you all who commented).  For those interested, the original letter and comments can be found here: Letter to the editor: Budget priorities – more sidewalks or bike lanes? – My Edmonds News

The letter was worded very intentionally and received some expected responses. The intent was to make a point about priorities, not necessarily about where the money comes from to fund the proposed projects. In one way or another, the money comes from our taxes. Either federal, state or local. I don’t see any philanthropic “revenue” in our budget. Having said this, let me elaborate on the funding sources a bit more to clarify some potential misconceptions.

The current proposed 2022 budget has $901,780 earmarked for new sidewalks plus $350,000 for sidewalk maintenance and $1,562,390 for bike lanes. Of the bike lane budget, $191,850 are city funds and the remainder is from a grant provided by Sound Transit. Exploring how the grant money was obtained is interesting.

The Sound Transit grant program itself explicitly states that the program would have funded safe sidewalks. However, we chose (prioritized) to submit an application for bike lanes instead of for sidewalks. An excerpt from the grant program states:

The $100 million Systems Access Fund (SAF) included in the 2016 voter-approved Sound Transit 3 (ST3) measure is allocated equally among Sound Transit’s five subareas for projects such as safe sidewalks, protected bike lanes, shared use paths, improved bus-rail integration, and pick-up and drop-off areas.”

The full grant program specifics can be found at: Connecting to stations | System Access Fund | Sound Transit.

I think it’s disingenuous for the city to suggest that we didn’t have an alternative and now feel obligated to spend the grant money on the bike lane project. That may be true now that the grant has been approved, but we had a choice back then. The city chose to prioritize bike lanes over sidewalks.

So, what can, or should we be doing going forward? This is not a sidewalk/bike lane issue per se. It’s a discussion about a vision for the city and our priorities.  Priorities are all about choices. Sometimes difficult choices. In budgeting, difficult choices have to be made. Our current city council seems to be having difficulty making these choices. That’s where we can help.

I would like to see more and better engagement with our city administration and city council on a whole host of decisions facing us. You pick the topic. You tell them how you’d prioritize the budget between wants and needs. Use this sidewalk/bike lane topic as a starting point if you like because it’s low-hanging fruit. Unless they hear from us, they’ll continue to do what they want, not what we need.

Time is running out as the council is ramrodding the budget process through in an expedited manner this year. A proposed budget that has expenditures exceeding revenues. So difficult decisions have to be made to balance this budget. Comment here and I’ll forward them to the council, or better yet, reach out directly to our City Council (council@edmondswa.gov) and let them know your thoughts and ideas. They’re anxious to hear from us!

Jim Ogonowski
Edmonds

 

  1. Admit it, Jim. You want this to be an either/or issue. You framed it in this way from the beginning. In the first letter you mistakenly claimed that the city is spending dramatically more of its money on bike lanes than sidewalks. Now in the second letter we read that you believe the council for some inexplicable reason chose to use a $1.85 million grant for bike lanes rather than sidewalks. You state your motivation very clearly when you write, “Unless they [the council] hear from us, they’ll continue to do what they want, not what we need.”
    My points of view are: (1) Don’t raise my taxes. (2) The city can afford to spend money both on sidewalks and bike lanes without raising my taxes. (3) I voted for council members to make informed decisions regarding the best ratio of money for each category.

  2. Jim, thank you for delineating more fully the sourcing and options for the funding for the bike lanes. I think your point that this, in the end, is all tax dollars – our money – whether it is a grant or dollars from the city budget, is an imperative we all need to keep in mind. Those “grant dollars” do not come from a money tree; they come from our pocketbooks and percentage-wise, moreso from those least able to afford them.

  3. Personally, I wanted to have Sound Transit partner with the City to build a boutique parking structure and sidewalks and improve bike lanes based on the demographics of our population base. That train left the track and I still think the City should pursue a boutique parking structure as it could be done for less than $5.0MM.

    Jim, I want to thank you for your involvement in this budget process this year and your assistance in looking up documents and asking basic questions regarding the global aspect of the budget and basic cashflow analyses, forecasting and policy (or lack there of).

  4. It seems as if 1,251 million is being budgeted for sidewalks and 1,562 million for bike lanes. Seems equitable to me. Can the grant money for bike lanes be switched to sidewalks if a change is desired? That is not usually allowed within the terms of a grant. Both amenities will be appreciated in Edmonds so it feels fair to me.

    1. I am hoping to see this changed very soon…its not about equitable its about what is necessary. What is want and what is needed is what this is all about. What is needed and mainly for safety of citizens particularly children is in my opinion what is important. SO for me I would stop all plans for bike lanes until our sidewalks are fixed. Sorry I don’t even have kids but I see them…Its sad to have to walk thru mud and crud so a handful can bike everywhere. Sorry…

  5. All this money being spent on bike lanes is “insane” !!! 220th is a prime example, you hardly ever see bike travel on that road !! I travel that street daily and rarely ever see the bike lanes being used !! They are a waste of out tax dollars !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.