Council 2022 budget amendments: Racial equity manager moved to contract position, PIO stays full time

When it came to discussing proposed amendments to the city’s already-approved 2022 budget, there was a lot of talk but not much action during Tuesday night’s Edmonds City Council special business meeting.

At the start of the meeting, Councilmembers Laura Johnson and Susan Paine — both of whom have been strongly opposed to revisiting the budget — spent a fair amount of time asking for clarifications and explanations on various proposals. That prompted a frustrated Councilmember Will Chen to encourage the council “to keep your eyes on the ball and stop the filibuster,” adding that city departments are waiting for the council to finalize the budget. “If we keep delaying this, it’s not good for our city,” Chen said.

Councilmembers did approve one budget adjustment: by a 5-2 supermajority vote, required to make changes to the existing budget, the council shifted the status of the city’s new Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) program manager from a full-time permanent position to a three-year contract role. The person hired for the job will provide citywide leadership to advance race, equity, diversity and inclusion goals. While councilmembers said they support the effort, those favoring the contract job said they were worried that the duties for the new role had not been defined well enough to justify making it a permanent position.

Council President Vivian Olson

The idea for a three-year contract, at $100,000 per year, was proposed by Council President Vivian Olson and supported by Councilmembers Diane Buckshnis, Will Chen, Kristiana Johnson and Neil Tibbott. Voting no were Councilmembers L. Johnson and Paine. Laura Johnson asked Human Resources Manager Emily Wagener if it would be more difficult to hire a person in contract role compared to a full-time job, and Wagener said it would “be more difficult” to do so. Among the challenges — a smaller pool of candidates and having contract employees leave in the middle of the term because they find something permanent.

Laura Johnson

Laura Johnson also asked Wagener if she thought the city’s need for the REDI program manager position would be “going away in three years.”

“I absolutely do not,” Wagener replied. “I absolutely think that the city’s Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion goals are important and they aren’t going anywhere. If anything, I think this position will expand as time goes on.”

Paine had attempted to make an amendment to Olson’s proposal, suggesting the job be a five-year, temporary position, but that was defeated on a 3-3 vote (Paine, L.. Johnson and Chen voting for and K. Johnson, Olson and Tibbott against) with Buckshnis abstaining.

During the two-and-half-hour meeting, the council took a vote on just one other budget amendment — a proposal from Olson to rewrite the job description of the city’s full-time public information officer (PIO) to ensure the position creates “fact-based and neutral communications.” (Last week, Olson and some other councilmembers expressed concerns regarding communication from the mayor — distributed by the PIO — that criticized the council’s proposed budget amendments, and those concerns were voiced again Tuesday night.) While Olson’s proposal got four votes, it failed due to lack of a 5-2 supermajority.

After those votes, the council discussed just two other items out of the 34 total amendments that have been proposed: removal of a solar grant program aimed at a low- to moderate-income residents and deletion of $200,000 allocated in 2022 to the city’s human services office budget.

The argument for removing the solar grant program was based on reasoning that there were too many barriers to entry for lower-income households who might not be able to afford their portion of the costs for the program. However, Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin told the council the city’s goal is to cover as much of the installation cost as possible so that it is affordable to everyone.

“If the interest is to drive down that cost burden per installation, we can do that through the program itself when we draft that criteria,” McLaughlin said. The city also hopes to expand it to multifamily projects as well — all with the goal of helping to lower the city’s greenhouse gas emissions.

As for the $200,000 allocated to the human services division, the budget amentment narrative noted that the human services program carried forward into 2022 a total of $409,000 out of its $550,000 budget for 2021, and as a result “there is no need to add additional money.” But Deputy Parks Director Shannon Burley, who oversees the human services effort, said the city has been developing plans on many fronts to use that money, and all of those reflect human services priorities named by the city council last year. Among them: hiring a city social worker, establishing collaboration and support with partner organizations to jointly fund social services, developing programs to keep vulnerable people in their homes, removing barriers that prevent people from securing shelter, and ensuring that cold weather shelters and hygiene opportunities are available to those in need.

Burley also said that Snohomish County is viewing Edmonds and other municipalities as potential partners in creating shelter for those who are unhoused in South County, noting that the city is legally prohibited from removing those who are homeless from public property “without being able to provide adequate shelter and property storage.”

“Those are both incredibly expensive things,” Burley added. “I don’t think any of us feel the city will be able to that on our own. It will have to be in collaboration with neigboring jurisdictions and the county.” The current dollars in Edmonds’ human services budget, she said, reflect the city’s commitment to jointly funding shelter space.

After discussing those two amendments — but not taking action — the council made an effort to extend the meeting beyond 10:30 p.m., but that motion failed to get a majority vote and the meeting was adjourned.

Prior to the 8 p.m. meeting, the council met in its three commmittes, which are work sessions for the council and city staff. There were numerous items discussed but one of them was a conversation in the Finance Committee about how the city could address $75,000 in unpaid dues for members of the city’s Business Improvement District (otherwise known as the Edmonds Downtown Alliance or ED). City Administrative Services Director Dave Turley asked Finance Committee members Diane Buckshnis and Will Chen for guidance on how to approach the debt, which represents roughly one year of the organization’s $80,000 annual budget.

The Business Improvement District, instituted in downtown Edmonds in 2013 with financial oversight from the city, includes an area comprised on the north by Bell Street, on the east by Durbin Street, on the south by Homeland Drive and on the west by Sunset Avenue South and Railroad Street. All revenues come from dues that are assessed to members of the city’s downtown core, currently ranging from $30 to $90 per quarter.

Buckshnis and Chen agreed there was no point in going after the estimated $37,000 in unpaid dues from businesses that have closed. As for collecting the other $38,000 from active businesses, councilmembers agreed with a suggestion from Council President Vivian Olson to form a subcommittee consisting of councilmembers and ED members to come up with options for addressing the issue.

In December 2019, the council rejected a city staff proposal to suspend the business license of any downtown business delinquent in its payments to ED.

Proposed new Sherwood Elementary playground

Also of interest, during the Parks and Public Works Committee meeting, Councilmembers Kristiana Johnson and Neil Tibbott agreed to forward to next week’s council consent agenda a proposal for the city to put $20,000 toward a Sherwood Elementary School playground renovation project that would expand the school’s current playground — and could be used by the community during non-school hours. The Edmonds School District would provide matching funds for the project, which is also receiving money from the school’s Parent Staff Organization.

— By Teresa Wippel

  1. RE: rewrite the job description of the city’s full-time public information officer (PIO) to ensure the position creates “fact-based and neutral communications.”

    I find it amazing…No disgusting, that some councilmembers in our community do not support fact-based and unbiased reporting from the media. That says a lot about the intent and character of those members.

    Members of the Council that voted against this, please explain your rational for excluding “fact-based and neutral communications” from the job description of the PIO.

    1. Teresa, Please name the councilmembers who voted against “fact-based and neutral communications.” Everyone needs to know who they are.

      1. The vote was Councilmembers Olson, Buckshnis, K. Johnson and Tibbott for, and Paine, L. Johnson and Chen against.

  2. My Edmonds news curious if they adopted the Edmonds police department ask to adopt expiring state language around extreme protection orders?

    1. A discussion on that item is going to happen at a future council business meeting. Nothing was decided in the committee meeting.

  3. The above article reported that Laura Johnson asked Wagener if she thought the city’s need for the REDI program manager position would be “going away in three years.” “I absolutely do not,” Wagener replied. “I absolutely think that the city’s Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion goals are important and they aren’t going anywhere. If anything, I think this position will expand as time goes on.” Why? We need some specificity here and we have not received any concrete explanations.

    At the last full council meeting on 2/1/22 council members Johnson and Paine spoke in favor of adding a REDI program manager, nothing substantial was offered they simply reiterated phrases and talking points a veritable word salad that you always get from the left. More platitudes – there was nothing solid or fact based. Sort of “gee everyone else is doing it, it seems to be the thing to do and it will make us feel better about ourselves”. Go back and listen to their statements from the February 1st meeting.

    Why is it necessary for Edmonds to have a REDI program manager? The reason(s) are not clear. It seems that the introduction of Equity experts whether in private business, school districts and municipalities often sew mistrust where none existed and creates division from cooperation. Why are we following Seattle, Everett, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Baltimore and other failed towns and cities where these policies are obviously not working. I don’t get it.

    Mr Chen said it best “it comes from the heart” and I think Edmonds has a heart. The Mayor and two Council members are driving this and I am afraid the others are being guilted into supporting this position.

  4. I agree with Scott. How did we ever get along without it, in the past?
    If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!

  5. Here is your catch 22 for the day. A city has a area that isn’t as prosperous as other areas so they get on their soapbox and talk about investment in that area. They fund infrastructure parks streets schools etc.. all great but it raises the cost of living in those areas forcing the people they want to help out of the area they call this gentrification and predominantly negatively affects people of color. Catch 22. Then it gives the city a excuse to add things like REDI positions and more human resources positions bigger government that costs a lot to fund with little of those resources making it to those in need and raises taxes making it even harder for people to afford to live there. Catch 22.

  6. I’m not sure Mr. Chen really understood that he was voting against the concept of fact based, neutral communications in the job description of the PIO position or that there needed to be a 5 to 2 vote to assure it got in the future job description. I’d sure like him to elaborate on why he took the position he took on this.

    The result of not getting this language into this job description is that we now have a full time city position appointed by the mayor. There is nothing to prevent an unscrupulous mayor from using this person as his personal Minister of Propaganda as opposed to being a simple unbiased reporter of the facts to the public.

    Our current city government is badly broken and cannot be fixed as it exists. I see signs that the mayor/council divide will only keep fracturing. The people need a much more open and honest approach to how things are done. For example:

    1. Why has there not been a progress report on what is going on with civic field park? Is it on schedule? Is it still within the planned budget? Have they run into unforeseen environmental issues?

    2. Is the city tree code really legal and fair to private property owners and even good for the protection of our trees overall?

    3. Why do we allow our city elected officials to engage in secrete legal proceedings against private citizens and land purchase deals? Are the citizens aware that the city is trying to take beach property away from owners at the Ebb Tide Condo to complete a public beach walk?

    4. Why won’t the mayor and police chief even meet to talk with a citizen who was the victim of crime in our city? Are they too busy? Are they just not interested? Is this citizen just not important enough to bother with?

    5.Why doesn’t Mr. Reidy get answers to his frequent very reasonable questions?

    6. Will the new PIO give us unbiased answers to these type questions without a job description mandate to do so?

    1. There is supposed to be an update to the council on Civic Field renovations in March, is my understanding — Teresa

  7. Scott Victor is spot on. Spending $100K for a REDI manager shows how to play the race card to build a carreer that divides us. Just treat others the way we’d like to be treated and get on with life. Morgan Freeman was right about how to help reduce racism. “Quit talking about it” . Edmonds = Seattle North, is there hope it will turn around?

    1. What amazes me Bill is the mayor/staff position on this is that we will need this job filled like forever and its function will expand over time. Logically it seems like a competent person would work themselves out of a job once everyone was up to speed on proper procedures and practices. Are they planning to hire incompetents or is Edmonds government so racist and bigoted that the problems just can’t be solved and will keep multiplying forever? That Mayor staff response last night was pathetic and embarrassing.

  8. Clint totally agree with you. Its know as divide and conquer. When will Paine and Laura Johson quit acting like sore losers and start caring about the city

  9. Clint, this is what happens when there’s not enough good people running for office as well as informed voters. The mayor vote was tough because Neil won the core/heart of Edmonds count.
    Psssst…….don’t tell anyone…..we escapted WA to ID, closer to familiy and further from crazyness recently.

  10. The biggest problem in those council meetings is how they use the rules of order with motions on the floor. A council member makes a motion; then another member makes a motion to amend; and then another member moves to amend the amendment. The result is everyone gets lost and confused, especially the usually biased executive moderator who has a minimal understanding of the rules of order to begin with. The result is the members often don’t really know what they are voting on. Take one motion at a time and forget all the amendments to amendments so you always know exactly what you are doing and what you are voting for or against. I doubt this would take anymore time than the amendment process does and I think you would end up with better legislation over all. Of course this would preclude the amendment process being used as a tactic so I assume I’m whistling in the wind here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.