Members of the public had a chance to express their thoughts Tuesday night on proposed amendments to the 2022 adopted City of Edmonds budget, although the council was only able to discuss a few of them during the time allocated on the agenda.
Those residents offering public testimony Tuesday night had a range of opinions on the list of budget amendments, which had been compiled by Councilmember Diane Buckshnis. Many of the amendments had been proposed by Buckshnis and Councilmember Kristiana Johnson for discussion during the 2021 budget deliberation process. However, due to schedule conflicts, neither councilmember was in attendance on Nov. 17 when those amendments were discussed and the final budget was approved.
Councilmembers Buckshnis, K. Johnson and Vivian Olson for several weeks last fall had argued that the 2021 budget was being approved too quickly, and that budget deliberations should include the participation of councilmembers who were elected by the voters. That would have meant including new Councilmember Will Chen, who was scheduled to be seated at the Nov. 23 meeting, following vote certification that same day. In the end, the budget was approved on Nov. 17 by a vote of 4-1, with current Councilmembers Paine and Laura Johnson, and former Councilmembers Adrienne Fraley-Monillas and Luke Distelhorst voting yes, Olson voting no, and Buckshnis and K. Johnson absent.
Now, with two new councilmembers — Chen, who took Distelhorst’s seat, and Neil Tibbott, who replaced Fraley-Monillas — the council could conceivably make changes to the existing budget if they can muster a 5-2 supermajority. The purpose of Tuesday night’s meeting was to hear from the public and have some discussion. The council is likely to continue its deliberations and take a vote at a special business meeting next Tuesday, Feb. 8 — which would be scheduled around the council’s regular committee meetings.
Those offering testimony during the public hearing Tuesday provided a range of perspectives. Brad Bernatek, a 12-year Edmonds resident who said he has an MBA and 25 years of financial experience, noted that despite his years of budgeting work, he found it difficult to address the merits of the proposed budget amendments. Instead, he chose to address the process, stating it was reasonable and prudent for the council “to have an adopted budget before early December, so that city staff can act on that budget in a timely fashion.” While there should always be an opportunity to revise the budget based on new information, “we are now 32 days into the new budget year and it’s hard not to wonder whether some of this is a game of tit for tat,” he said.
In addition, Bernatek said, “the hyperbolic rhetoric on any side of the issue is unhelpful. We’re talking about expenditures that represent a fraction of the city budget. It seems overblown to suggest these cuts will make Edmonds unsafe, polluted and uninformed,” he said, referring to Mayor Mike Nelson’s recent statement on the budget amendments, published here. “Likewise, it’s not financial Armageddon,” Bernatek added.
Former City Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas also weighed in during public testimony, calling a council amendment to remove an additional $200,000 allocated for the city’s human services department “incompetence at best.” She and several others also criticized an amendment that would return the city’s public information officer (PIO) from a full-time to a part-time job, pointing to the city’s need to increase its communication with residents, especially to those outside the downtown area.
The role of the PIO was also debated later among councilmembers, with Councilmember Laura Johnson speaking in support of having a full-time job, noting that nearby cities have one or more full-time public information positions on their staff. Edmonds Acting Economic Development and Community Services Director Doug Merriman, who oversees the PIO position, was invited to weigh in, stating that the position — which issues press releases, responds to media requests, monitors city social media accounts and helps to organizes a variety of community-facing events — plays a key role in city communication. A public information officer ensures the city takes a proactive approach to — and is transparent about — city-supplied information, Merriman said.
As for the value of having a full-time communications professional, “the world doesn’t wait for someone’s part-time hours,” he added.
Council President Vivian Olson and Councilmember K. Johnson offered a different take on the position, pointing in particular to the mayor’s recent statement — issued by the PIO — that was sharply critical of the council’s proposed budget amendments. “I’m asking if it’s appropriate for the PIO to be used to undermine other electeds on council,” Olson said.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she has noticed over the past few years that “council often gets information in this manner instead of being told by the mayor…we are informed by these public information announcements, and I don’t think this serves the city. When I see the (PIO) role expanded, I see it as a marketing piece for the city that is not in the council’s best interest, and that concerns me.”
Another proposed budget amendment that received considerable discussion was one that would change the status of the city’s newly approved full-time Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) program manager from a full-time position to one that is either hired as a consultant or as a temporary employee for a limited time period.
Councilmemembers who supported this amendment stressed that they weren’t opposed to the position, which would provide citywide leadership to advance race, equity, diversity and inclusion goals. But they said they were worried that the duties for the new role had not been defined thoroughly enough to justify adding a permanent position to the city’s budget.
“I will support a REDI manager,” added Councilmember Chen. “It does take a full-time job to do it. But I want the council to have the options to renew the position on an annual basis to make sure we have the right person to do the work. As we all know, this is a very sensitive subject and I don’t want to commit to a position and if we hire the wrong person with the wrong skill set, it could potentially cause more harm than benefit.”
Another set of amendments that received some council discussion Tuesday night centered on the Edmonds Police Department’s request to restructure the department’s command structure, adding a new commander position. Councilmember Diane Buckshnis had suggested that the proposal go through council committees, so it could be included with a broader discussion of other police department reorganization plans. Police Chief Michelle Bennett came into the virtual meeting to explain more details about the request, which includes an already-approved budget for one commander, and a plan to transform two current sergeant positions into commander positions, for a total of three. Bennett said there is some urgency to the current budget item, as she is preparing to hire two new assistant chiefs and she would like to have the new command structure in place before finalizing those hires.
One item that drew several comments during the public hearing, but wasn’t discussed by the council Tuesday night, was a budget amendment that would add $100,000 for the Creative District’s 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor project. That budget item was eliminated from 2022 deliberations after several councilmembers said that for equity reasons, it was important to ensure that projects outside downtown Edmonds were prioritized. However, several public commenters Tuesday night noted that the 4th Avenue Corridor project played a key role in Edmonds’ selection as Washington State’s first Creative District, and because of that it was important to continue the effort.
You can review all of the amendments here.
In other business Tuesday night, the council received a presentation on the city’s draft 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan. Consultant Steve Duh walked councilmembers through the details of the plan, which is a six-year guide for managing city’s parks, open space, trails and recreation opportunities. There will be a public hearing on the plan Feb. 15, with council approval set for Feb. 22.
Duh says there was an “intentional and focused” effort to reach out to the entire Edmonds community, in four different languages — Chinese, English, Korean and Spanish. Just over 2,000 participants were engaged in PROS plan process, with most of that occurring through a community survey. Of those responding, 99% feel parks and recreation is essential or important to community, Duh said.
It was shocking to hear that those requesting these amendments didn’t understand the police reorganization system, that the dive team was never historically made up of just three divers, that the PIO job description was quite detailed, and the list seemingly went on… I expected more due diligence prior to these numerous suggestions.
Ann,
What’s shocking to me is the realization that Mayor Nelson’s PIO issued his recent “Commentary: Council budget cuts will make Edmonds unsafe, polluted and uninformed”
I share Council President Olson’s concern: “I’m asking if it’s appropriate for the PIO to be used to undermine other electeds on council,” and Councilmember Kristiana Johnson’s: “When I see the (PIO) role expanded, I see it as a marketing piece for the city that is not in the council’s best interest, and that concerns me.”
In writing my LTE, https://myedmondsnews.com/2022/01/letter-to-the-editor-mayors-statement-on-budget-amendments-not-supported-by-facts/
I didn’t think about the PIO’s role in the Mayor’s commentary. This raises more questions regarding support of a full-time PIO to “enhance our transparency on city initiatives and projects”. And the statement that a PIO “will improve public safety by providing timely and critical information to the public” in times of emergency. Again, how is emergency management the role of the PIO?
I just re read his LTE. It’s signed by him. Can someone clarify what’s been vetted as to the PIO “issuing” the LTE? I may be missing something here but the word issuing needs clarification. I honestly have no opinion either way as I would suspect that any PIO position would include collaboration with a mayor. I’m simply looking for details around how this statement by a CM was vetted.
As the recipient of news releases from the mayor’s office (and as someone who has served as a PIO for government agencies several times during my career), I can confirm that the PIO serves as the transmitter of these messages. That person sends these messages out to the news media on behalf of elected officials and also serves as the point person for answering questions about them. When I was a PIO, I also often drafted the messages based on input from the officials I was working with, and then those officials would approve them to go out under their name. I can’t speak to what process was followed here, only to what I know is standard practice for public information officers. — Teresa Wippel, Publisher
Thanks Teresa and that’s what I envisioned a part of a PIO position would be. I’m still of course wondering what the facts are behind the assertation that the Edmonds PIO used her position to criticize CM’s via and LTE signed by the Mayor since it was used as part of that council persons argument around a full time PIO. I’m just looking for facts here. I’ll reach out to the council person who made the statement. Thanks again.
I guess the question is here is if the PIO position is supporting the mayor’s administration, but who’s funding for a FTE needs to be approved by the council, whether it’s prudent for the council to fund a PIO who is assisting the mayor in undermining the council or its members. Not sure if the council wants to approve a FTE for a public information officer who will be assisting draft messages of putting “Kick Me” signs on the backs of the council members.
I learned yesterday that the Mayor’s PIO was a member of Luke Distelhorst’s “campaign team”, and co-authored the following LTE posted on 3-13-21:
https://myedmondsnews.com/2021/03/letter-to-the-editor-luke-distelhorst-is-the-leader-we-need-on-city-council/
That person was hired as the new half-time PIO on 4/7/21.
Distelhorst voted on the PIO decision package before he left office, which made it a full-time position effective 1/1/2022.
Nothing to see here, folks. Just move along!
Joan Bloom:
There is nothing inappropriate about a PIO working on a campaign on their own time as long as they’re not using the city PIO platform to promote a candidate but as a former CM I’m sure you know that!
I think thet the CM who called the PIO out by name at the public meeting Tuesday should apologize to the PIO or face censure.
Joan, if true, and I have no reason to think otherwise, then there was a conflict of interest on Luke’s part, and he should have disclosed it and abstained from the vote. Unacceptable for a councilmember to use their position for the benefit of a friend. His true colors have now been shown (as if they weren’t known previously). Thanks for uncovering this.
Hope this is fair warning to all elected officials. We deserve better.
Jim,
It’s true. Thanks for recognizing that my comment was about Distelhorst’s vote. Former Council President Susan Paine and Mayor Nelson’s rushed budget schedule robbed Councilmembers, newly elected Will Chen, and some citizens, of the opportunity to participate in budget deliberations. A half-time PIO will be sufficient to help Mayor Nelson continue to inform the public of his personal agenda for Edmonds.
Sounds like the role of PIO is a little ambiguous. There is a fine line between a PIO and a MOP (Minister of Propaganda). It would be best if we somehow knew the difference here.