Edmonds School Board approves 2022-23 budget, addresses rumors about critical race theory

School Board President Nancy Katims tells the audience critical race theory will not be taught in Edmonds schools this year.

The Edmonds School District Board of Directors at its Aug. 9 meeting held a second reading of and approved the district’s 2022-23 school year budget.

A breakdown of the new budget was given at the board’s July 12 meeting, with total planned expenditures for the upcoming year being roughly $397 million. The budget includes roughly $3.3 million for the Associated Student Body fund, $52 million for the capital projects fund and $3.8 million for the transportation vehicle fund. The district also plans to purchase seven new wheelchair buses and six small buses before the beginning of the school year.

“I just want to appreciate all the work that has gone into presenting this budget and the many study sessions that we’ve done prior to taking this vote,” said Director Carin Chase.

The budget was approved unanimously.

In addition, Board President Nancy Katims announced that the board’s new student representatives will be joining the meetings in September. They will begin the orientation process and meet with the directors later this month before becoming official student reps.

“Nearly all our schools are represented so [that’s great],” Katims said. “We’re excited to have them.”

During the public comment section of the meeting, a few community members voiced their opinions on critical race theory, which they said has been been rumored to be making its way into public school curriculums nationwide this upcoming school year.

Some commenters accused the district of trying to hide the class in its curriculum, while others voiced their approval of teaching such a topic.

“You should really do your research on what critical race theory actually is before coming up to speak your disapproval of it,” one community member said.

However, Board President Katims told the audience the district has no plans to teach critical race theory at all and has been very transparent about their curriculum.

“Everything we do is public,” Katims said. “Our teachers teach to the state standards. None of this is hidden. Our curriculum is not hidden. We are not doing things in secret. We are doing things that are approved by the state and are accepted as best practice in teaching and learning. In addition to that, it is unfortunate that critical race theory and culturally responsive teaching have the same initials. They are not the same thing. We have been doing culturally responsive teaching for years and years. Critical race theory is not something that we teach.”

The board of directors will resume its biweekly meeting schedule in September, with  the next meeting to be held Sept. 13.

— By Lauren Reichenbach

  1. “Culturally Responsive Teaching”, the new term for Critical Race Theory? When has this “term” been used? Parents, be on guard, be watchful and involved in your children(s) education. We live in a time where humans are now referring to themselves with pro nouns. Terminology is important. Pay attention.

    1. “We live in a time where humans are now referring to themselves with pro nouns. ”

      I’ve always used pronouns [sic]; “me” “I” , and I’m unaware of any but humans using nouns, verbs, pronouns, etc…

      Not sure what you mean.

    2. Uh, forbid that we should ever use a PRONOUN!!

      all
      another
      any
      anybody
      anyone
      anything
      as
      aught
      both
      each
      each other
      either
      enough
      everybody
      everyone
      everything
      few
      he
      her
      hers
      herself
      him
      himself
      his
      I
      idem
      it
      its
      itself
      many
      me
      mine
      most
      my
      myself
      naught
      neither
      no one
      nobody
      none
      nothing
      nought
      one
      one another
      other
      others
      ought
      our
      ours
      ourself
      ourselves
      several
      she
      some
      somebody
      someone
      something
      somewhat
      such
      suchlike
      that
      thee
      their
      theirs
      theirself
      theirselves
      them
      themself
      themselves
      there
      these
      they
      thine
      this
      those
      thou
      thy
      thyself
      us
      we
      what
      whatever
      whatnot
      whatsoever
      whence
      where
      whereby
      wherefrom
      wherein
      whereinto
      whereof
      whereon
      wherever
      wheresoever
      whereto
      whereunto
      wherewith
      wherewithal
      whether
      which
      whichever
      whichsoever
      who
      whoever
      whom
      whomever
      whomso
      whomsoever
      whose
      whosever
      whosesoever
      whoso
      whosoever
      ye
      yon
      yonder
      you
      your
      yours
      yourself
      yourselves

      Pronoun list aside, it’s just a matter of being respectful.

      1. I see that you have stated what you wished to state using words that you chose to use.

        Now do you see your failure in this?

        You did not post that which anyone else was forcing you to post and you did not let anyone else choose your words.

        Do you consider this to be your special priviledge?

  2. Yes, by all means, be sure to teach the “factual” history of race relations in America. We all know slavery was just a quaint little, mostly Southern, life style that gave people from another, backwards by our standards culture, the opportunity to learn a trade (cotton picking for no pay) and be taken care of cradle to grave. Besides, slavery is in the Christian bible, so it was really an okay thing.

    Enough with all the “theory” nonsense from both directions. Just teach the facts without bias as much as we can know them, and treat every student with dignity and respect. Pretty simple stuff, and not really all that political when you think about it. The golden rule works pretty well when people actually practice it, which seems to be less and less common around here. All our young people, regardless of skin pigmentation, desperately need an advanced education and a way to survive in a world where AI is taking over traditional jobs at an alarming rate; and we are arguing over pure unadulterated crap. It’s absurd.

    1. Thank you Mr Wright. An honest teaching of American history, good, bad, ugly, and beautiful, should not require adherence to any political ideology or theory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.