The Edmonds School District Board of Directors at its Aug. 9 meeting held a second reading of and approved the district’s 2022-23 school year budget.
A breakdown of the new budget was given at the board’s July 12 meeting, with total planned expenditures for the upcoming year being roughly $397 million. The budget includes roughly $3.3 million for the Associated Student Body fund, $52 million for the capital projects fund and $3.8 million for the transportation vehicle fund. The district also plans to purchase seven new wheelchair buses and six small buses before the beginning of the school year.
“I just want to appreciate all the work that has gone into presenting this budget and the many study sessions that we’ve done prior to taking this vote,” said Director Carin Chase.
The budget was approved unanimously.
In addition, Board President Nancy Katims announced that the board’s new student representatives will be joining the meetings in September. They will begin the orientation process and meet with the directors later this month before becoming official student reps.
“Nearly all our schools are represented so [that’s great],” Katims said. “We’re excited to have them.”
During the public comment section of the meeting, a few community members voiced their opinions on critical race theory, which they said has been been rumored to be making its way into public school curriculums nationwide this upcoming school year.
Some commenters accused the district of trying to hide the class in its curriculum, while others voiced their approval of teaching such a topic.
“You should really do your research on what critical race theory actually is before coming up to speak your disapproval of it,” one community member said.
However, Board President Katims told the audience the district has no plans to teach critical race theory at all and has been very transparent about their curriculum.
“Everything we do is public,” Katims said. “Our teachers teach to the state standards. None of this is hidden. Our curriculum is not hidden. We are not doing things in secret. We are doing things that are approved by the state and are accepted as best practice in teaching and learning. In addition to that, it is unfortunate that critical race theory and culturally responsive teaching have the same initials. They are not the same thing. We have been doing culturally responsive teaching for years and years. Critical race theory is not something that we teach.”
The board of directors will resume its biweekly meeting schedule in September, with the next meeting to be held Sept. 13.
— By Lauren Reichenbach
“Culturally Responsive Teaching”, the new term for Critical Race Theory? When has this “term” been used? Parents, be on guard, be watchful and involved in your children(s) education. We live in a time where humans are now referring to themselves with pro nouns. Terminology is important. Pay attention.
“We live in a time where humans are now referring to themselves with pro nouns. ”
I’ve always used pronouns [sic]; “me” “I” , and I’m unaware of any but humans using nouns, verbs, pronouns, etc…
Not sure what you mean.
Uh, forbid that we should ever use a PRONOUN!!
all
another
any
anybody
anyone
anything
as
aught
both
each
each other
either
enough
everybody
everyone
everything
few
he
her
hers
herself
him
himself
his
I
idem
it
its
itself
many
me
mine
most
my
myself
naught
neither
no one
nobody
none
nothing
nought
one
one another
other
others
ought
our
ours
ourself
ourselves
several
she
some
somebody
someone
something
somewhat
such
suchlike
that
thee
their
theirs
theirself
theirselves
them
themself
themselves
there
these
they
thine
this
those
thou
thy
thyself
us
we
what
whatever
whatnot
whatsoever
whence
where
whereby
wherefrom
wherein
whereinto
whereof
whereon
wherever
wheresoever
whereto
whereunto
wherewith
wherewithal
whether
which
whichever
whichsoever
who
whoever
whom
whomever
whomso
whomsoever
whose
whosever
whosesoever
whoso
whosoever
ye
yon
yonder
you
your
yours
yourself
yourselves
Pronoun list aside, it’s just a matter of being respectful.
I see that you have stated what you wished to state using words that you chose to use.
Now do you see your failure in this?
You did not post that which anyone else was forcing you to post and you did not let anyone else choose your words.
Do you consider this to be your special priviledge?
Yes, by all means, be sure to teach the “factual” history of race relations in America. We all know slavery was just a quaint little, mostly Southern, life style that gave people from another, backwards by our standards culture, the opportunity to learn a trade (cotton picking for no pay) and be taken care of cradle to grave. Besides, slavery is in the Christian bible, so it was really an okay thing.
Enough with all the “theory” nonsense from both directions. Just teach the facts without bias as much as we can know them, and treat every student with dignity and respect. Pretty simple stuff, and not really all that political when you think about it. The golden rule works pretty well when people actually practice it, which seems to be less and less common around here. All our young people, regardless of skin pigmentation, desperately need an advanced education and a way to survive in a world where AI is taking over traditional jobs at an alarming rate; and we are arguing over pure unadulterated crap. It’s absurd.
Thank you Mr Wright. An honest teaching of American history, good, bad, ugly, and beautiful, should not require adherence to any political ideology or theory.