Reader view: Open letter to the Washington State Democratic Party

Dear Democratic Candidates:

We, the undersigned, encourage you to advocate for the views held by the majority of voters in Washington state.

First of all, we would like to acknowledge that the state party is facing a critical test in the next two years, with impending change in the governor’s mansion and a shuffling of leadership roles at the highest levels of state government. As Democratic elected officials, we are committed to building a big tent and working to reach practical goals that are within the purview of what voters in our communities would actually support.

We’re hoping to articulate the views of grassroots, moderate Democrats. The type of messaging that works in deep blue pockets of Seattle for the Democrats is going to alienate voters in many other parts of the state. We think this is a lost opportunity for the local Democratic Parties because most of our people faithfully voted for Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. Our state consistently votes for Democrats in state and national elections. So why aren’t some Democratic voters seeing themselves represented in their local Democratic Parties, the county parties and the legislative district parties?

As elected officials, we recognize that the challenges and compromise inherent in governing are distinct from the rhetoric of campaigning. From Renton to Kenmore, we see local Democratic parties endorse challengers to Democratic incumbents. Some of whom may hold fringe views that would not be supported by the communities they wish to govern. Our fear is that as local Democratic parties prop up these candidates to challenge incumbent Democrats, we will end up seeing repeats of the 2019 Seattle City Attorney race, when a Democratic candidate knocked out the moderate incumbent in the primary by advocating for “abolishing the police” and subsequently lost in the general election to a Republican candidate.

Thanks to this epic buffoonery, we now have a Republican city attorney in Seattle who just ended community court. This was a program that had saved the lives of many people in recovery who would otherwise be trapped in the criminal justice system for what many of us now understand is a health issue. This is an example of the backlash that we see from voters when certain candidates treat the primary as an experiment for their unpopular views. Voters rebel and they end up making a Republican electable in a race that no one thought a Republican would ever be competitive in.

The 2019 Seattle City Attorney race is an example of the failure of “defund the police“ rhetoric. Anti-police statements are especially inappropriate in 2023, when property crime is skyrocketing in our state and our communities feel less safe. Washington state already has the lowest police presence per capita in the country and many of our cities are struggling to retain and recruit new law enforcement officers. There are more nuanced ways to address the complex issues of policing and criminal justice reform than bite-sized slogans from social media.

As moderate Democrats, it saddens us that the Republicans have been able to position themselves as the “voice of reason” in the local political dialogue on multiple public safety issues by exploiting these fissures in the local Democratic Parties. Especially when some figures in the local Republican Party themselves hold unpopular views on topics like abortion rights and gun control, which plays a large part in our nation’s public safety crisis. We should not be losing Democratic voters to these Far Right candidates.

Our communities are just as concerned about public safety as they are about affordable housing, and want increased support for drug treatment options and mental health services to help those experiencing homelessness. We strongly believe that there is not a one-size-fits-all solution to these societal challenges. What works in one community may not work for another. We call on the Washington State Democratic Party to discourage public disagreements and disparaging comments made from within the party against Democratic officials who may have different perspectives on good public policy. We each know our communities and our constituents best.

These public disagreements obfuscate the issues and may sour our voters on the Democratic Party. We should be known as the party that gets results for our communities. The party that invests in infrastructure, the party that cares for workers, the party that fights for civil rights and protects our freedoms. There are figures in the mainstream media and on social media who want to highlight our party’s internal strife. By feeding these provocateurs material, endorsed Democratic candidates who espouse extreme positions make it difficult for our party to win elections outside of the big cities in Western Washington.

Local government is by far the most non-partisan level of government in our political system. There is very little that the candidates should be disagreeing about when it comes to maintaining livable communities with clean drinking water. We entreat figures on both ends of the political spectrum to stop tearing this country apart to personally enrich themselves by stoking outrage in their bases.

We are better than this. We are proud of our democratic system of government. We know that we can continue to deliver for our voters and fix a lot of the problems that our society is facing post-pandemic.

In conclusion, we entreat key stakeholders in the Washington State Democratic Party to remember that representing the views of the voters is our jobs as public officials. Our representative form of democracy is the envy of the world, and we have to protect it assiduously at all levels of government.

As grassroots Democrats, we look forward to seeing what our candidates do around the state in this municipal election cycle.

By Jenna Nand, Edmonds City Councilmember

Shirley Sutton, 32nd Legislative District Democrats

Riaz Khan, Mukilteo City Councilmember

  1. Sorry lost me when you insinuated Republicans were bad. This is no message of unity.

    1. Mr. Fairchild,

      Is there a specific quote in this letter that says “Republicans are bad”? I enjoy working with my conservative colleagues just as much as my liberal colleagues, and would never make such a simplistic statement that “Republicans are bad.”

      Regards,

      Jenna Nand

      1. Jena
        “2019 Seattle City Attorney race, when a Democratic candidate knocked out the moderate incumbent in the primary by advocating for “abolishing the police” and subsequently lost in the general election to a Republican candidate.

        Thanks to this epic buffoonery, we now have a Republican city attorney in Seattle who just ended community court.”

        From your words it seems that the person elected to Seattle city attorney is a Republican and isn’t doing the job to your satisfaction and the insulation is that when a Republican holds a position bad things happen and if the bad Democrats hadn’t run a extreme candidate the Republican wouldn’t have won and the city would be a better place if your moderate had won. At least this is how I read it. I get the impression that only moderate Democrats are acceptable leaders. My 2 cents

      2. Jena to add

        ” Asmoderate Democrats, it saddens us that the Republicans have been able to position themselves as the “voice of reason” in the local political dialogue on multiple public safety issues by exploiting these fissures in the local Democratic Parties. Especially when some figures in the local Republican Party themselves hold unpopular views on topics like abortion rights and gun control, which plays a large part in our nation’s public safety crisis. We should not be losing Democratic voters to these Far Right candidates.” Please explain how this is not derogatory to Republicans?

  2. Jenna Nand has demonstrated once again that she is intimately involved with the Democratic Party. She needs to resign from her non-partisan position as an Edmonds city councilmember.

    1. Mr. Wambolt,

      I’m surprised that you aren’t a fan of our open letter, considering that you contacted Teresa Wippel and asked her if she was planning on running our letter, which originally appeared in the Edmonds Beacon.

      Regards,

      Jenna Nand,
      Edmonds City Council Member

      1. I was hoping that Teresa would be running your letter because I wanted her many readers to be aware of your blatant partisanship. Ms. Nand, you need to do the right thing and resign your city council position.

    1. Mr. Halld,

      You are correct. However, when you are filling out your primary ballot (and turning it in tomorrow!), you may notice that some of the candidates list “Prefers Democratic Party” or “Prefers Republican Party” next to their name to signal their affiliation for the non-partisan positions they are running for.

      While some people genuinely are nonpartisan, the vast majority of candidates for municipal office do have a party affiliation and I have always preferred that candidates be transparent with voters about their true opinions on the issues.

      Regards,

      Jenna Nand

    2. Letter makes me sad..too bad a council person would express herself like that..she needs to move on or be voted out..

      1. Voters will have to wait 4 more years to vote her out because she is not contested in this election cycle. I suspect she timed her editorials to be after the election filing deadline. If the editorials had appeared prior to the deadline I suspect some would have been provoked by them to run against her. Nand now needs to resign.

        1. I had forgotten that Ms. Nand was appointed to her position. I don’t recall the rules for someone in her situation; she may have to participate in the November general election.

  3. How do the authors of this letter know what views are held by “the majority of voters in Washington?” What exactly is a “moderate Democrat?” And a call for ending “public disagreements” seems contrary to the spirited history of dissent that distinguishes this country from others. This type of approach is why I don’t align with either party.

  4. “some figures in the local Republican Party themselves hold unpopular views on topics like abortion rights and gun control, which plays a large part in our nation’s public safety crisis.”

    Can you please explain further what you mean here?

  5. Excellent open letter, Jenna. Accurate and logical foundational points articulated.

  6. I am an independent voter that supports the best person for the job.
    I support law and order candidates.
    I support the steps necessary to end homelessness, including forced removal of chronic mental illness and addiction persons that refuse treatment and are in a revolving cycle of crime.
    I support a person’s rights to personal health care that they and their doctor decide as best. Government should not be in the business of dictating personal health choices.
    I support common sense gun laws that support age, training, red flag, and background checks. I don’t support gun bans.

    I am so saddened by the wave of people that don’t think they should be held accountable for their actions.

    1. I concur that I’m an independent voter too. CM Nand is saying what some elected officials in Edmonds do a little bit more covertly (Like Democratic Party funded Mayor Nelson or CM Paine) that their loyalty first and foremost seems to their Democratic Party and to their constituents secondary.

      1. Mr. Drechsler,

        If you think that my loyalty is to the Democratic Party primarily and the constituents secondly, you obviously did not pay attention to any of the letters I wrote about the mandatory upzoning laws that the state legislature passed during the latest session.

        Regards,

        Jenna Nand

  7. It’s too bad that the Democrat Party is weaponizing local elections…we don’t care what you stand for,…

    Just fill the Freakin’ potholes!!

    …Just sayin’

  8. The domination of the left wing has turned Washington into an unlivable hellhole, but God forbid a Repulican suggest a policy change. Jenna sees any opinion from any side other than the left as unwelcome, and blatantly states that in this letter. I think the response from Kelly Loop sums this letter up nicely. Nauseating.

  9. Dear All,

    Unfortunately, I don’t have time to respond to everyone’s comments, but I appreciate your passion! I sent this letter over to Teresa at My Edmonds News because I was hoping to spark discussion about our state’s dominant party (mission accomplished) and also to use it as a vehicle to remind all of you to vote in the primary. Your ballots are due by 8 PM today! Remember, democracy is not a state, it is an action.

    Regards,

    Jenna Nand
    Edmonds City Council

  10. Although we expect city council members not to be partisan to one party, we can glean from the issues they champion, where they are on the political spectrum. We wouldn’t want to elect people to represent us, who have no political opinions whatsoever. We just expect that in a small town like Edmonds, the issues we have to solve are about fairness, practicality, and with the main goal of making our town thrive, and not partisan bickering.

    Having said that, thank you Jenna Nand et al., for pointing out that the extreme wing of the Democrat party has derailed and sunk previously healthy, safe, low-crime cities into crime warrens. However, the whole Democrat party was complicit in this. In Seattle, they all, knowingly used the most damaging strategies: they became the drug addicts’ drug dealer, removed all punishments for drug use, etc. and NO, the homeless are not there due to gentrification 40% are not from Seattle or WA. But now you’re calling on your party to step up, and be the fixers. Too late, we’ve realized that D excel at setting fires, and then want a prize for putting them out, with our $, of course.

  11. We have a Bill of Rights with teeth and a Constitution that allows fair and free elections. When one-party controls, bad things happen. Jenna is right; the radicals are in control. But she is wrong about the Seattle prosecutor. Fortunately a Republican was elected and she has reduced case backlogs, prosecutions have increased, the median time for filing a case is down from 124 days to 3 days. More cases are moving through the system. Result; some improvement to downtown Seattle. A few more Republicans and moderate or conservative Democrats are needed. What has one-party control in Washington wrought? Overdose deaths have shattered previous records. Homelessness and open-air drug markets flourish. Murder rates and crime have soared. Garbage and graffiti are everywhere. Gas prices, highest in the nation. Law enforcement has been cut. State government grows, parental rights shrink. Massive government spending increases. Higher taxes. WA now leads the nation in per capita auto theft….and the list goes on. Jenna Nand is no more non-partisan than Mike Nelson. It’s obvious that King County, Shoreline and Everett are feeling the results of leftist solutions to crime and homelessness. Keep Edmonds non partisan. For now: VOTE THE PERSON NOT THE PARTY.

  12. Ms. Nand is free to state her opinion just as all of you who comment, state yours frequently.
    Ms. Nand, I wouldn’t waste your energy responding to every comment that you dislike or disagree with . They also have the right to disagree with a public official who writes a letter to everyone who reads MEN stating her opinion.

  13. “an unlivable hellhole” Hyperbole how much? I agree with your point, but I’m quite happy living here. Maybe try Haiti, or Saudi, or perhaps Ukraine? Niger? Compared to some of the real hellholes, we do pretty well!

    1. Great point Nathaniel. There are lots of countries where a food bank of surplus would be considered a major miracle and they are ubiquitous here.

  14. This letter is a great example of someone with a little inexperience getting a little ahead of their skis. I dont share the view she should resign over this, but she should acknowledge the letter is more than a a little biased toward Dem.s which isn’t appropriate for her nonpartisan position here. Signing off on it with her official title was a bad idea. Concerned Citizen would have been better, but not writing it would probably have been an even better idea. Being truly unbiased and nonpartisan is a hard thing to pull off for anyone. Almost impossible actually.

  15. “As Democratic elected officials…” Ms. Nand, just a reminder that you were not elected by the community, you were appointed by the city council to fill a vacancy. Besides, your position is supposed to be nonpartisan. So, to start your letter off using this phrase is disturbing particularly when you sign the letter as a city council member and not as just a resident of Edmonds.

    I respect your opinion, and willing to engage in a dialogue. Good for you. I would just suggest that you choose your words more carefully and be cognizant whether you’re speaking as a council member or a resident of Edmonds. The way this letter is written you have clearly defined yourself as a partisan Democratic councilmember of Edmonds.

  16. So, Ms Nand is writing to fellow Democrat candidates with the plea that ” we entreat key stakeholders in the Washington State Democratic Party to remember that representing the views of the voters is our jobs as public officials.” Too bad they repeatedly do just the opposite. Democrat Governor Inslee signed bills supported by the majority Democrats in the legislature like Strom Peterson and Marco Liias that:
    1. Raised our gas tax to the highest in the nation.
    2. Impossed cap and trade for carbon law which increased the wholesale gas prices to the highest in the nation.
    3. Eliminated local zoning control to mandate an end to single family zoning.
    4. Restricted police from pursuing criminals.
    5. Eliminated the death penalty for 1st degree murder.
    6. Refused to impose felony penalties for open use of narcotics.

    I do not think the majority of Washington voters think these actions and many others taken by Democrat officials reflect the views and opinions of our citizens.

  17. Jena is right in so far as the Democrat party has moved far to the left, moderate is a memory. It used to be even know the majority was Democrats Republicans had influence and policy was moderate, one could say a good balance, that is no longer the case today’s Democrats have no concern for other points of view and rule without consideration of even their supporters. Not long ago the state refused the vote of the people over car tabs and as others have pointed out have made policy that even their own supporters question. My opinion y’all going off the deep end without ever learning to swim.

  18. Trying to solve human relations problems based on ideological litmus test based actions does not work. Our two party system of government obviously does not work well and is getting worse by the day. This is leading us toward authoritarianism, repression of thought and personal freedom, with possible civil war again if we do away with the concept that no man or woman is above the law, i.e. democracy.

    By law our city government is supposed to be nonpartisan. Running a city should be a process of simply making and keeping a town livable and useful to all it’s citizens by eliminating human relations problems and facilitating our human interactions to the greatest extent possible. In Edmonds we have lost our way on accomplishing this with over reach by the power positions, too broad a mission with outrageous mission creep and just plain greed on the part of many developers and entrepreneurs.

  19. I tried to read all the comments here as I first saw Ms. Nand’s “open letter” in the Edmonds Beacon. I am exhausted. It’s like a tennis match with everyone’s heads bobbing first to the right and then to the left. The division continues – in big cities, and small cities and small towns. For the record, when folks refer to the “Democrat” party, it makes my teeth hurt. It is the Democratic Party just as it is the Republican Party NOT the “Republic” party. I know why people use the term the way they do (or I’m pretty sure I know why). Just wish they wouldn’t. Realize I’m not commenting one way or the other on Ms. Nand’s letter. There is plenty of that here. Like I said, exhausting. I don’t see a “win-win” anywhere but maybe this is a good healthy dialogue?

Comments are closed.