New tree-planting projects to sprout in Washington with help from $36M in grants

A tree-lined street in Tumwater. The City of Tumwater is part of a group of more than a dozen communities to get money from the federal government to boost their urban tree canopy. (Laurel Demkovich/Washington State Standard)

Call it seed money. More than a dozen Washington communities — including Lynnwood — will receive a combined $36.3 million from the federal government for urban forestry projects.

The funding is part of about $1.1 billion in competitive grants the U.S. Department of Agriculture awarded across the country last week to plant and maintain trees in urban areas. The program is meant to help combat extreme heat and climate change and improve access to nature.

The state Department of Natural Resources will also open applications this fall for another $7 million in grants to help communities grow their urban tree canopies. Applications for that money are due between October and early January.

Will Rubin, a DNR spokesperson, said the hope is that communities that weren’t able to secure any of the grants awarded last week can receive some of this funding.

“It’s an all-hands-on-deck statewide team effort,” Rubin said. “Everybody’s got an urban forest. Those are important no matter how big they are, no matter how big the town is.”

‘Sense of urgency’

The amount of tree-related federal funding coming into the state is “unprecedented,” but Washignton’s urban forestry program is not new, Rubin said.

However, he said there has been increased interest in it after the 2021 heat dome, where temperatures in the 100s left 159 people dead. The extreme heat also scorched trees.

“There’s been an added awareness and added sense of urgency since then,” Rubin said.

Studies show a lack of tree cover in cities contributes to hotter temperatures, greater pollution and higher noise levels.

A 2021 city of Seattle study found a 13% increase in a neighborhood’s tree canopy is associated with a half-degree reduction in temperature. It also found that the city lost 255 acres of canopy since a 2016 assessment and that neighborhoods that are less wealthy and have more minority residents have fewer trees.

Seattle isn’t alone. According to American Forests’ Tree Equity Score tool, nearly 85% of urban neighborhoods in Washington have inadequate tree cover.

American Forest partnered with DNR in April to launch the Washington Tree Equity Collaborative to expand tree cover in and around cities across the state.

Seeing green

Seattle, the city and county of Spokane, and the Snohomish Conservation District are among the communities receiving the most federal funding from the new urban forestry grants. Also receiving a grant award is the South Lynnwood Urban Forestry and Stewardship Program. This project will protect urban forests, riparian areas, and wetlands to expand healthy urban tree canopy within the South Lynnwood neighborhood. This project will develop a robust stewardship program and an intensive outreach and education component for the residents.

Seattle will receive $12 million to plant trees in neighborhoods across the city, train youth and restore forested areas. The city will also receive another $900,000 for tree planting and other work at the Delridge Native Forest Garden, a four-acre city-owned plot.

The money comes months after the city adopted a controversial new tree protection ordinance. Some tree advocates argued developers had too much sway over the rewrite of the policy.

Projects in the Spokane area will receive $12 million. In the city of Spokane, $6 million will go toward a goal of achieving 30% canopy cover by 2030. The county conservation district will use the other $6 million to expand forestry career opportunities through education programs and apprenticeships.

Garth Davis, the Spokane Conservation District forestry program manager, said the funding is an opportunity for the region’s future stewards of the land.

“It becomes a matter of bringing up a new generation of people who care for the land and teaching them the delicate balance of our natural resources and human interaction,” Davis said in a statement.

In Snohomish County, nearly $2.5 million will go toward planting more trees in Everett, Marysville and on Tulalip Tribal land.

Elsewhere, the Snoqualmie Indian Tribe received about $1.3 million to protect urban forest canopies on their ancestral lands and to launch related educational programs.

The full list of awardees can be found on the U.S. Forest Service website.

— By Laurel Demkovich, Washington State Standard

Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: info@washingtonstatestandard.com. Follow Washington State Standard on Facebook and Twitter.

  1. It is noteworthy that Edmonds is NOT on the list even though there are ‘supposed’ City Administration initiatives for “greening Edmonds”.

    The public pleaded with the Mayor and Parks Director to include tree planting in the City’s Parks and Open Space Plan to improve our tree canopy, enhance wildlife corridors, and share the burdens placed on private property owners to retain trees to meet tree canopy goals. But, the Mayor had other agendas for the PROS Plan and now Edmonds is left-out of federal funding to help City finances for “greening Edmonds”.

  2. Hanging around Edmonds for as long as I have has taught me that almost all of our Mayors (Chief Executive Officers of our City) generally view the “greening Edmonds” concept as bringing as much of the “long green” into town as possible. Trees and the environment in general have not been high up there on their lists of things to get done.

    Our vibe has been building as many giant houses, apartments and condos as possible and to Hell with trees and natural green space. Who needs that when there is big money to be made off the Edmonds’ way of life.

    I’d sure like to see some of Mike Rosen’s views on our environmental issues spelled out in writing before the coming election that will likely install him as our next Mayor. For example we have no idea of where he stands on the issue of what should happen with the Unocal property in terms of preservation of nature vs. development of business and housing. Does he favor saving salmon and restoration of the entire marsh eco-system over anything else; or does he favor a mix of the two purposes in an effort to appease everyone? No easy answers here.

  3. My oversimplification about why this is infuriating: City governments encourage developers to cut trees, build, pave and depart the destruction with their profits. The little guy pays though taxes for an attempt to re-green. Re-greening is basically wonderful. Better than giving up. It’s just a horrible, crazy way to do business. Makes rich people richer and not held to account for environmental harm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.