
Recurring mold. Pathways between buildings not accessible to people with disabilities. Lack of windows and ventilation. Not enough restrooms.
These were among the issues identified during a public tour of College Place Middle School Monday. The school is one of several designated for replacement or improvements through the $594 million Edmonds School District School Construction Bond (Proposition 1) on the special election ballot being mailed to voters this week.
The school district scheduled the tour in response to community requests after the Edmonds School Board voted unanimously to place two propositions on the ballot that will upgrade several district elementary and middle schools. The proposals would replace College Place Middle and the neighboring College Place Elementary School with new campuses.
Nearly 40 people – including parents, schoolchildren and community members – visited the middle school Monday night to examine the aging classrooms, gymnasium and campus that do not meet current building codes and other standards. These include:
- Steep slopes between school parking lots and school buildings that don’t meet American Disabilities Act requirements.
- Lmited access to drinking fountains.
- Lack of private changing spaces in locker rooms
- Gymnasium bleachers that don’t accommodate all students to attend a single event and that also lack disability access
- Recurring mold issues on the building’s exterior
- Lack of windows or ventilation in some buildings, such as the life science and art buildings
“The school is located on two busy streets (76th Avenue West and 208th Street Southwest),” said Director of Capital Projects Taine Wilton, who led most of the tour. Because the school includes multiple buildings – similar to a college campus – “it’s a very difficult site to secure,” Wilton added.
In addition, the existing school doesn’t meet current building code for the number of restroom facilities, she said.
College Place Middle was built in 1970, and it has had a number of upgrades over the years, including seismic retrofitting and roof repairs. Enrollment this year is 640 students – mostly from the cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood – and there are 50 staff members. The school has 26 classrooms, one gymnasium, one common area that is also used as a lunchroom and one library.
The campus layout is similar to K-12 campuses that are more common in Southern California, where students are exposed to the outdoors when moving between classrooms.
“This style was very prevalent at this time primarily because the multiple buildings are essentially residential in scale, so it didn’t take a commercial contractor to build these multiple, little buildings,” Wilton said. “It also saved on costs because you don’t have interior corridors, so there’s less buildings to heat and you can have a smaller boiler plant that heats the whole campus.”
During the 1960s, Snohomish County was experiencing a boom in population and industry growth. To accommodate growing families, schools had to be built fast.
“There was a lot of pressure to build schools,” Milton said. “All these buildings had to be built quickly to accommodate the number of students that were here at that time. But we don’t have that pressure now. The pressure is energy efficiency and safety.”
“The rebuilding process started at the high school level, so we’ve replaced all of our high schools and two middle schools,” she continued. “This school was intended to be replaced in the 2020 bond, and that failed. And then COVID hit. It took some time to recover from COVID and that’s why we’re only coming to the voters.”
The district has already replaced its other aging middle schools – Meadowdale Middle, which opened in 1961, and Alderwood Middle, which opened in 1965 – and College Place is next on the list.
Parents from Lynnwood and Edmonds attending the tour agreed that College Place Middle needs the upgrade.
“My daughters are going to attend school here one day, and our public schools, which serve about 70 to 80% of our students in our district, are our backbone of our democracy,” said Edmonds resident Adel Sefrioui. “We need to do our part to ensure that (the school district is) vibrant and healthy for our future, and investing in our kids and schools – including the physical conditions – our communities stay strong. I really believe strong schools build strong communities, whether we send our kids to public, private or homeschools. We all benefit when our public schools are strong.”
“Driving by, it looks like a prison,” said Edmonds resident Bethany Allen, who has children attending Sherwood Elementary. When she peeked into the girl’s P.E. locker room, she felt like she was in a time capsule.
“Once I got in, it was actually worse than I thought,” she said. “The locker rooms in Kirkland [Middle School] are so much nicer. It doesn’t have to be nice, but it has to be functional. It’s amazing that these buildings are still being used to teach students.”
Allen also supports the switch to the sixth- to eighth-grade model across the Edmonds School District in the 2028-29 school year. That would occur as part of the district’s plan to open a new middle school – also funded by the proposed construction bond. Allen thinks that two years of middle school is too short for students to establish relationships.
“I do want my kids to go to a safe and modern school,” Allen said. “It does concern me that there’s 105 exterior doors, especially in this day and age. I think one of the biggest reasons parents send their kids to private school is security, and knowing that their kids will be safe. I’ve had friends who had this conversation, and security is key.”
“We want to increase enrollment,” Allen said, “but we’re losing kids to private schools if we don’t have schools that are competitive to match the standards we see in other places, we’re not going to draw in more students.”
Here’s a summary of what’s before voters:
Proposition 1: School Construction Bond
$594 million
Replace four of the district’s oldest schools
College Place Elementary (1969)
College Place Middle (1970)
Oak Heights Elementary (1967)
Westgate Elementary (1958)
Build an additional middle school
Middle school would switch to a sixth- through eighth-grade model across the district beginning with the 2028-29 school year. This model aligns with educational standards and expands academic options for sixth graders, the district said.
Fund capital improvement projects
Improve safety, security and accessibility
Maintain buildings
Upgrade tracks and fields
Proposition 2: Replacement Technology/Capital Levy
$30 million each year for four years
Technology resources
Chromebooks for each student
Staff technology training
Enhance cybersecurity
Capital projects
Mechanical, electrical and plumbing upgrades
Other site and building improvements
More information about the 2024 School Construction Bond and Replacement Technology/Capital Levy can be found here.
— Story and photos by Nick Ng
Thank you so much for this article, including the pictures, which showcase how much a new school is needed. Our students deserve a safe learning environment.
Thank you so much for this in depth coverage. It’s so important the community has an inside look at how desperately we need to pass Props 1 and 2.
Ballots drop tomorrow. Please vote early and please vote yes for our kids!
As the grandparent of a child who will be attending College Place middle school this Fall – who will clearly not reap the benefits of the recently passed bond – I would like to hear about what positive experiences she might expect. Yes, buildings are important but what goes on inside is MORE important. Are there quality teachers with strong and positive moral authority willing to engage this amazing group of young people sho will be attending for the next two years?
I recently served on the District’s School bonds study committee for the 2nd ‘cycle’ in a row (which held every one of our hard-working meetings in College Place Middle School library). I can well advise every parent and child within our District that the proposed replacement program outlined in the above MEN article is sorely needed. Every voter [whether or not you’re the parent(s) of a school child] should vote YES on their ballot(s)!!
Vote yes for kids and for your property values! It takes broad community support to get these measures passed. School construction bonds require a super majority of 60% of the vote to pass. In 2020, the last time the district tried to pass a bond, it failed even though it got 56% of the vote because of the super majority requirement. It’s really hard to get 60% of voters to agree on anything these days! However, Shoreline’s most recent school bond got over 70% of the vote so we know it can be done! They now have the beautiful schools to show for it. I have a 7th grader at College Place Middle. The faculty and staff are great but the building is a liability and it’s only going to get worse.
Please vote yes on Prop 1 and 2. Our children absolutely must have safe schools so that they can face the challenges of the future. My children won’t attend any of the schools affected by Prop 1, but I fully support it. Access to ample education is a constitutional right in this state, not a luxury. It is our paramount duty as a community.
I live in the College Place service area and work elsewhere in Lynnwood. I have a 4th grader and refuse to send him to CP. The general surrounding area of CP is getting horrible, and although we live in an expensive, sub-standard apartment, he deserves much better for his place of education. I pay all of my city taxes and vote for all levys. Until we receive proper funding to make CP a suitable and safe learning environment, I’ll continue driving him 15 miles away. We have to do better and start prioritizing children and their education in this community. The local public school is shameful.
Thanks for sharing Kelly, you are right he deserves much better! How there can be schools like these still being used ( I’ll add our school Sherwood Elementary to the mix, safer neighborhood, same type of outdated facility) is mind boggling but the fact is last time the levy for these buildings was voted down to rebuild due to the fact people feel this is one cost (higher taxes) of home ownership they can control by voting no, (unlike a utility tax, etc.,) also they seem to think they are sending an anti-tax message, they obviously are not thinking about a mom driving her student to school 15 miles each way being a result of their no vote. You are a good mom! Vote YES on the levy folks!
Commenters,
Please do not attempt to derail this important topic by politicizing it. Your strong desire to inform readers about your opinions on topics such as voucher programs, book banning and CRT(which by the way is only a factor in higher Ed., I’m an educator and parent) is not the topic of this particular forum. We don’t need distractions. Let me also say that as a graduate of elementary and high school private-Catholic education, as well as a parent of 2 private-school educated children, and 3 public school-educated children, yanking your kiddos out of the system is not the answer. It may satisfy you, but you aren’t doing your children any favors. They are the ones that must learn to live and work with ALL people regardless of their beliefs and backgrounds. Segregating students never was and never will be a good plan. Private schools is a temporary fix. Also, let me tell you there are good and bad teachers everywhere. At least in public schools, underperforming staff have school boards ,superintendents, and associations to answer to. Private schools are governed by themselves. Let’s sit at the same table, people. This is everyone’s future.
I was at the tour. the reporting is accurate and the information cited is what I too, heard. I couldn’t attend the Thursday rally but I will be voting yes.
Kelly so only those that agree with you should have any input? Should only favorable comments be allowed? Should only those that agree with your opinion only have a voice? Where would be the correct place for us to show our opposition? Last I checked public opinion/free speech was a constitutional right, do you wish to deny us that right?
I am a retired school teacher. I definitely will be voting yes. Please don’t think “I don’t have kids in school. It is of no concern to me” Our future is in the children. Please vote yes.
Not so against the new buildings but of course taxes do play a roll. My opinion that a new building will attract more students is contrary to the reasons why people are opting out of public education, are people home schooling because of buildings? Are people paying for private school because of buildings? The answer is no, so unless you solve that problem your draw toward public education is diminishing. Of course most of the population can’t afford anything else but hopefully a school choice initiative will let the money follow the student and let the cards fall as they may.
No money until the parents have a say in the curriculum. Dr Seuss and Winnie the Pooh removed and replaced by brainwashing books. LGBTQ-sorryI am gonna keep it simple like Dave Chapelle “The Alphabet People” When CRT is gone I will vote yes. I can hear the Liberals now-I supply free crying towels.
I am a student at College Place Middle School, please vote yes. My classes are filled to the brim with students and I hope that when my little sister goes to CPM she’ll have a new school and not have to deal with the liminal space I had to deal with. Some of my friends go to MMS and always tell me how much my school looks like a prison, rebuilding it would not only make it a safer learning environment but also just generally nicer looking. Thank you so much to the people who will be voting yes!
Thank you for sharing and speaking up! I am sorry we failed to pass the bond in 2020 that would have given you the safe and modern school you deserve – we are working hard out in the community to do better this time around.
I recommend getting your kids into private schools.
I am a student at College Place Middle School, and I must admit that the school that I go to is very old. The roofs are stained with chocolate milk, and there is no accessible path for disabled individuals to reach the cafeteria. On one occasion, while in the cafeteria, I went to retrieve my pizza from the lunchroom only to discover that the pepperoni slice I selected looked gray and shriveled. This should be considered a health code violation, but it seems they have gotten away with it. I hope that my brother will have a better experience at the school once they go through renovations and fix the mold issue.
We do not have children, but we’ve always supported public education. The condition of this school is an embarrassment to our community. Either we are committed to providing a quality education to our future citizens in a quality facility or not. Bite the bullet and build the schools.
Thank you so much!! Our kids need better schools.
I hope the next step is to serve a good lunch for the kids.
Tear down one of the schools, sell the land to a developer, and take the funds and invest in the other school…make it a super school.
Leave the tax payer alone…