
In his first Edmonds State of the City address, Mayor Mike Rosen took on the elephant that has been sitting in Edmonds’ living room for years – the city’s financial crisis – presenting an unvarnished look at what the city is up against and the path to long-term fiscal stability. The event was held in the Edmonds Waterfront Center in front of more than 100 attendees. An additional 75 logged in to view the address by livestream, and others viewed it on public access TV channel 21.
“This is not the kind of message I was hoping to deliver in my first State of the City,” Rosen began. “There will be no inspiring warm-up speakers, no fancy presentations. I’m not going to sell it, mask it, point fingers or assign blame – rather I’m going to give it to you straight.”
He went on to stress that his approach is grounded in transparency, respect and trust.
“Transparency is me talking to you and giving you straight information,” he continued. “And I believe that community members too often don’t get the respect and trust they deserve. I respect our community and the individuals in it, and accordingly I’ll be giving you straight-up information.
“Tonight we’ll be looking at our general fund finances – this is the money that keeps the machine running,” he explained. “I don’t expect any of you will be satisfied with what I’m about to tell you. Some will say it’s too detailed; others will say it’s not detailed enough. Some will say it’s too dry. There will be much to absorb, and many of you will have lots of questions on other important issues – why the train horns don’t work, what’s up with the Comp Plan, where did those numbers come from, and more.
“But that’s not what tonight is about. These and other questions can be presented next Tuesday when (the Edmonds City) Council will roll up its sleeves to look at what I’ll be talking about tonight. Also I will be here in this room on April 4 with the Edmonds Civic Roundtable and will take your questions on finances and other issues at that time, and we will also be holding a series of community meetings.”
Stressing again that “this is not about laying blame,” Rosen then began explaining the city’s financial situation when he took office Jan. 1, specifically noting the deterioration of general fund balances that became acute over the past two years, the council’s declaration of a fiscal emergency and the city’s significant use of one-time funds to balance the budget and cover expenses.
The four key points are as follows:
– Where are we?
– How did we get here?
– How do we get out of here – how do we fix this?
– How do we prevent this from happening again?
“We need a path to financial sustainability and resilience so we don’t find ourselves in this situation again,” he stressed.
After learning of the fiscal issues, Rosen looked for expertise and appointed the Blue Ribbon Advisory Panel. It is chaired by Mike Bailey, former City of Lynnwood finance director and now with the Municipal Research and Services Center, where his expertise has him specializing in working with cities in fiscal distress. The panel is comprised of seven members all with expertise in municipal audits (knowing where to look and where things hide), and who have managed big budgets in the public and private sectors.
Rosen continued by explaining that this isn’t just an Edmonds problem – many other cities are facing budget gaps. In fact, 53 of the 75 most populous cities in the U.S. didn’t have enough money to pay their bills in 2022.
“For Edmonds, one of the biggest drivers of the financial shortfall is simply that things cost more,” he explained. “Between 2021 and 2024, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased 21.7%. But at the same time, the state has imposed a 1% property tax restriction per year, meaning that costs are going up much faster than our revenue. Add to this other recently imposed state requirements, ranging from supplying public records to purchasing and implementing police cameras, and the shortfall gets worse.
“This is a recipe for slow death,” he added.
In an effort to plug this growing budget gap, Edmonds decided to fill it with two one-time uses of funds – the ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) money authorized by Congress to help cities recover from pandemic-related impacts, and savings from unfilled staff positions. Rosen went on to explain that a major use of these funds was to cover the annual $6.25 million check we must write to the South County Fire Regional Fire Authority for fire and emergency services.
But the ARPA money was a one-time thing, and assuming the vacant positions will be filled, that money won’t be there in 2024 either. Combined, these two one-time uses of money amount to an eye-opening 20% of the city’s general fund budget. Adding to the shortfall are a number of unbudgeted impacts, which had not been finalized or anticipated when the budget was prepared. These included union contracts, library building repairs resulting from a flood, new financial software and staff additions/salaries. These are detailed in the following slide:
“So that’s where we are,” said Rosen. “The total hole is $20.5 million, but I’m going to concentrate on the $12.5 million caused by our use of one-time funds and the unbudgeted impacts.”
He then moved on to the question of how we got here.
“First, the good news,” he began. “Our revenues over the past four years grew 27.8%. How cool is that! But at the same time, we decided to spend 44.9% more. Adding to this, our revenue forecasts were way off – we missed out targets by $1.6 million in 2020, $3.4 million in 2022, and $2.6 million in 2023.”
All this combined to throw the actual budget significantly out of line with the final approved budget as shown in the following slide:
“So this is where we began in 2024,” he said.
But the year 2024 will have some unique challenges of its own, and Rosen went on to enumerate some additional issues facing the city, ranging from paying for fire and EMS services (now that the city will have to do it without the one-time ARPA funds) and the completion of the required 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, to crime, homelessness and food insecurity – all of which will take money.
Adding to this, maintaining city facilities – the many buildings the city owns – also will cost money.
“I believe that if you have something you should maintain it,” he explained. “It will simply cost more in the future if you postpone maintenance.”
He then provided a list of city-owned facilities, all of which are in poor to critical condition, noting that 67% of these assets are more than 23 years old and things from wiring to plumbing to HVAC are just wearing out:
He then moved on to Edmonds’ roads, which also need attention.
“My truth is that time does not make potholes smaller or cheaper to fix,” he said. “In 2018 we looked at every foot of our 130 miles of roads. At that time the recommendation was to invest $2.5 million into fixing them. We ended up spending only $1.5 million, and today our roads are in worse shape than in 2018.”
Moving to the larger picture, he stressed that this is not a one-year problem, and we need to realize that we simply can’t do more for less money – the city is going to need to do fewer things and do them better. This means we need to prioritize by asking the following questions:
What must we do?
What should we not do?
What can we do differently?
What can be done by others?
What can be done later?
What is the gap, and how do we fill it?
“We need to change our culture to find this balance,” he explained. “This will provide a strategic path to get through 2024 through a combination of reducing expenses and developing strategies to replenish our reserves. Once we get through this year, we’ll need a new strategy to go forward that will include budgeting by priorities (what do we want?), zero-based budgeting (just because we’ve done it in the past, we don’t need to keep doing it if it doesn’t make sense), and continuing to identify savings. This means sitting down as a community and deciding what’s important to us.
“And I’ll start with this example: Water. I want it to show up when I want it and go away when I’m done with it. These are the conversations we need to have, and it means asking the following questions:”
But he stressed that along with this the city needs to take immediate actions to reduce expenses by at least $3.2 million. These actions will include what he called “a hiring chill,” eliminating programs, stopping some purchases, exploring rental alternatives, reducing some professional services, re-examining our organizational structure, reducing overtime and exploring collaborations, outsourcing and risk reduction.
It will also entail a look at revamping the budget process and fiscal procedures as detailed in the following two slides:
Finally, it will involve taking actions to increase the city’s revenues to include the following:
“I know this has been a lot to take in,” Rosen concluded. “But all this will give us a better sense of where we are, where we’re going, where we can find savings and our priorities.”
He then introduced Blue Ribbon Panel Chair Mike Bailey to say a few words.
“I’ve been very impressed with Mayor Rosen’s candidness and his approach to finding solutions, with no talk about who’s to blame,” Bailey began. “I’ve worked with many other cities in fiscal distress, and be assured, I’ve seen much worse than this. Edmonds has hard-working, dedicated employees, engaged citizens, and I’m sure that together we can right the ship and put policies in place that will ensure a long-term healthy fiscal environment.”
Bailey was followed by City Council President Vivian Olson.
“Thank you, Mayor Rosen, for giving us the real truth and nothing but the truth,” she said. “The council looks forward to working with the new mayor as we move forward as a community with everyone’s input and engagement. You can expect three town halls this year, the first on April 18. I encourage everyone to call or email us with your thoughts and concerns.”
“It hurts to go through this, I know,” Rosen said after returning to the stage for final remarks. “There’s so much to love about Edmonds – we all chose to live here, after all. There are many cities who would love to have what we have. And I promise you – we will get through this together, and we’ll be better on the other side of it.”
You can view the State of the City PowerPoint here. A full video and transcript of Mayor Rosen’s 2024 State of the City address is available on the Mayor’s web page here.
— By Larry Vogel
Excellent presentation!
I appreciate the honest update. In a nutshell the CPI has increased 21% while the revenues have increased 27% not including the Covid boondoggle funds the city received during this period. So it’s clear during this period we had a spending problem and not a revenue problem. To solve a problem you have to understand the problem so hopefully this will be the starting point. While the mayor is correct that these financial challenges are facing cities and communities all over the country. The good news is the only city this Mayor and Council have to be concerned about and deal with is Edmonds.
While the Mayor and the panel are certainly competent I don’t see how they can even start this process without looking back 4 years at the PreCovid staffing, spending, programs etc and use that as a baseline to move forward. I have no doubt that many programs, costs, employees were added during this time are not necessities going forward. Tough decisions will need to be made if the intent is to solve the problem rather than just finding new revenue streams (taxes) to pay for unnecessary waste and costs created during the past 4 years.
Finally the Mayor needs to figure out who on the staff wants to be part of the solution and not part of the problem. Good Luck.
Don, I appreciate your summary level observation that the city has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. I am still scratching my head as to why the directors hired 47 people during 2023 as of Oct. 2023. (Reference- presentation to city council on 10-17-2023 by HR department ).
After creating a spending problem for several years running, I expect that the leadership will decide that our level of spending is only a “little too high” for the services we need, and that we need a big fat public safety bond issue in 2024 in order to balance revenues with expenses. Who’s pushing for eliminating waste, for paring back that bloated budget for implementing the ERP system, for increasing productivity by re-engineering the antiquated business processes, for stopping the practice of spending a lot of money to have consultants develop plans that we don’t have the money or political will to implement, for stopping the mentality that spending more on police equipment and facilities will keep the neighborhoods safer?
Nice to see our new mayor taking the lead and moving ahead towards fiscal responsibility. Great work ahead.
Looks like we got way more than we voted for. Thank you Mr. Mayor for your clear eyed assessment, thoughtful practical solutions and assembling a team to help us achieve the kind of today and tomorrow Edmonds deserves.
“If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.” The Landmark purchase and development is digging a deeper hole.
I’m kind of a believer in telling the truth generally being the best policy. In that sense I think this speech (which I attended) was pretty much a home run and long needed here.
One of the presentation elements left out of this article was the picture of a one dollar bill showing that property tax revenue the city gets from property tax we pay is only 14 cents out of every dollar. The truth is that to just keep the level of service we now have; we will need to either vote ourselves higher property taxes or sell lots municipal bonds which is borrowing and paying lots of interest. The other alternative would be cutting staff and services to the bone.
It might be good to start by not shooting ourselves in the feet anymore. It’s time for Landmark, promising to buy Unocal, The Missing Link, and the over visioning nonsense to go bye-bye. Also, how are food insecurity, solving homelessness, Fentanyl, behavioral health, and climate change activism, vital issues for our city government to be grappling with? Until you stop special interests from ruling the day in Edmonds we will remain broke.
Telling the truth is absolutely the best policy, and when you do you have only one story to remember.
I attended as well. It was a very clear, very concise analysis of the issues at hand. There was no blame placed and a tone of positive momentum in balancing the checkbook. The Mayor outlined several initiatives that the City is working on to balance the books and replenish the reserves. It was a candid review of where things are and gave a good summary of revenue and spending.
I look forward to seeing the work Council and the Mayor and City Administration are going to do to prioritize and meet the needs of the City while balancing the expenditures.
Splitting hairs on you, George, but I would very respectfully assert that the Mayor and the City Administration are one in the same and he owns what the people under him in his administration do and advocate for. The mayor and the council are not going to fix this without major assistance from volunteer citizen resources and citizens being assertive about what city priorities are (or should be anyway); taking care of those first and foremost and ignoring the never ending white noise of saving the world by various advocacy groups. We’ve been promised at least three real open ended city hall type meetings and budgeting by priorities. It remains to be seen what we will actually get, and it’s way to soon to be euphoric. Just being honest is kind of a low bar for asserting excellence and a good choice of leadership and most certainly not proof of anything yet.
Clinton,
I agree. I like his plan of additional engagement from volunteers with some experience (or even those with no experience but a wealth of knowledge).
I was surprised by the attendance, maybe 100 ot 150 folks at the meeting. I supported the Mayor in his election, and zi wanted to see, first hand, what he was spending his time and our money on.
It was a little sad. Public engagement isn’t always pretty, it isn’t always fun, and sometimes no one ever agrees 100% if the time, but being present is important. I have a hard time sometimes justifying my lack of involvement. I thought, with as heated and contentious as this election cycle was, that more people would be there.
Public discourse and debate are important. Public involvement is important. I am glad the Mayor started with public engagement. I don’t understand all of the inner workings of City Administration, but the speech was a candid look into what is going on.
So refreshing to see honesty and transparency in Politics today, we got the right guy!!
Thank you Mayor Rosen for such an insightful presentation. The topic of city finances may have been negative but something we all needed to know. I believe the city of Edmonds is very fortunate to have a new mayor who is willing to take on such a monumental task.
I appreciate the work to make hard decisions to change our financial picture. It is also good to look at history and learn from it. When we moved here the library was a financial burden on the city. The voters agreed to have Edmonds join the Sno-Isle system. Our citizens provide more revenue to Sno-Ise than any other city.
However a few years back the pipes that provide water to the planting between the library and the Frances Anderson Center broke down. Water flowed overnight to the library causing the loss of many library services. The repair was costly and took a long time. The latest report mentions the high cost.
The question I have is which entity, the city or Sno-Isle was responsible for having a system to detect the overnight leak Do we have regular inspections of water systems to make sure there is early detection. There needs to be a look at such possible beakdowns throughout the city. That is an important part of the financial decisions in the future.
Many thanks to My Edmonds News for detailed coverage of this event. The article is very helpful for those of us not able to attend in person.
Boy howdy I am thrilled that we elected this guy! These are tenuous times and we will need a steady hand to keep the ship upright ! And this Mike is the perfect person to do just that !
Thank you to My Edmonds News for this excellent article. I think a lot more people would have attended in person if it wasn’t in the middle of spring sports season. Parents can’t be in two places as once, so it’s good to be able to read the recap in local news.
Thank you to Mayor Rosen for so clearly (and without blame) spelling out how we got here and what needs to be done to move forward. The example of the potholes makes me think of the sewer situation. Our water bills are exceptionally high because of the sewer payment. When you don’t take care of things that need to be fixed, and push that cost off until later, it can often become even more expensive.
Hi George Bennett,
Public engagement is the key to a better Edmonds. We have 17 boards and commissions with 150+ volunteer citizens lending their experience and skills to help with input to the staff and elected. City departments with staff and a director have major responsibilities: Finance, Planning and Development, Police, Public Works, Parks, and Community Services/Economic Development. Council committees parallel city depts. The Planning Board has the most responsibility for input to staff and council. The PB lines up with the Planning and Development dept and gets tasks directly from staff and council and publishes an extended agenda for their work. Good example of how to organize public engagement.
Our city would function better if we had some form of organized citizen involvement to parallel the departments and council committees who would work on issues in a timelier fashion than how it is done today with limited requests from council and annual reports.
In his State of the City presentation Mayor Rosen advanced the idea of creating a “citizen budget advisory committee”. Interpretation: this committee would parallel the Finance Dept and the Council Finance committee. What a great addition to citizen engagement.
George, space does not permit a detailed discussion of what other citizen engagements would help but ask Teresa for my email and send me yours and I will send more details.
I’m grateful to our Edmonds neighbors who are willing to lean in and help solve problems and thank you all!
Darrol is absolutely right about way better citizen input mechanisms being needed. Our three minutes to sing public comment period at city council meetings is all but useless in terms of honest and straight forward two way communication between the elected and their constituents. Some commenters abuse this system with irrelevant and even irrational commenting while some mayors and CMs abuse the system by body language indicating disinterest and disengagement or even joking toward the commenters. It doesn’t work well and should be scrapped in favor of something else that actually looks like real two way communication opportunities. Maybe something like once a month neighborhood city Halls on a rotating basis or even social events where people could just interact with elected officials more casually and comfortably. There just has to be a better way.