Is it a bird, a plane? No, it’s a drone spraying paint over graffiti along Washington’s state roads.
Washington may soon employ aerial drone technology to deal with a growing graffiti problem on highway infrastructure. Lawmakers this session passed a bill and set aside $1 million for a Department of Transportation pilot program focused on finding new ways to erase spray paint from road signs, walls and bridges.
The proposal passed 96-1 in the House and 38-11 in the Senate with only Democrats opposed. Gov. Jay Inslee signed the bill into law last week.
As the top Republican on the House Transportation Committee, bill sponsor Rep. Andrew Barkis, R-Olympia, said he had spent time traveling up and down the state’s highways.
“It became clear to me that the graffiti on all of the beautiful work we’ve been doing is getting out of control,” Barkis said.
The amount the state spends on graffiti cleanup every year has been on the rise, hitting a peak in 2020 of more than $700,000. In the last two-year budget cycle, the state spent $1.4 million, according to the state Department of Transportation.
The department said it has seen an increase in graffiti in recent years especially on newly completed bridges and overpasses or on construction projects that are closed to traffic.
But graffiti has struck more difficult-to-reach places, too. Last February, for example, two overhead signs on Interstate 5 near State Route 512 in Tacoma were defaced and cost between $40,000 to $50,000 to replace.
With a shortfall in funding for maintenance and preservation, Sen. Marko Liias, D-Everett, said the department isn’t always able to clean up graffiti quickly and must prioritize other needs, such as road repair, snow and ice removal, or traffic signal fixes.
He said he hopes that technology like drones can help.
The new program will start in June and run for about a year. The department is encouraged to focus on the Interstate 5 Puget Sound region and the north Spokane corridor.
“I am confident this pilot program will make significant strides in combating graffiti vandalism and reestablishing a culture of respect for our shared spaces,” Barkis said in a statement.
The department must also look at ways that it can identify people who damage property. An original version of the bill would have required the department to use its tolling and work zone cameras to do this.
But in committee hearings on the bill, the department expressed concerns with the requirements.
Tony Leingang, at the Department of Transportation, said the staff who are in charge of monitoring the state’s traffic cameras are already stretched thin.
“We do have a large network of cameras, but we don’t have people who can look at all cameras at one time,” he said.
In a blog post from last year, the department also said it would take significant investment from the state to use its cameras to store videos of people defacing signs or other property.
The final version of the pilot program does not require the department to use the cameras to catch illegal graffiti activity but encourages it to look at ways it might be able to take this step.
The department said it is exploring options for sanctioned public spaces for graffiti artists. Last year, the department said it was working with its artists-in-residence program to find a way to do that.
by Laurel Demkovich, Washington State Standard
Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: info@washingtonstatestandard.com. Follow Washington State Standard on Facebook and Twitter.
Without consequences, it will only continue to get worse.
No where in this report does it say that our representatives in the legislature considered the other method of dealing with this criminal blight on our communities. Such as, how about preventing it in the first place? How about painful punishment: accountability, arrest and jail for those who take their spray cans out at night and deface our surfaces with their ugly gang tagging? Oh no, we wouldn’t want to do that! Charging these “expressive artists” with a crime and jail time would only make them feel bad and we wouldn’t want that, (sarcasm).
Graffiti is a graphic example, (pun intended), of a community that has control of its rule of law. But it seems that in our legislature the rule of law is a pejorative term these recent years. And as we have seen, when you do not enforce the rule of law, this is what you get. More laws broken, more chaos, unsafe communities. Graffiti is an outdoor advertisement that in this community, you don’t have to fear accountability for breaking the law.
Mark and readers, If you read carefully six of the last seven paragraphs address your initial concern. Although the article is somewhat vague, it basically outlines content of recently passed bill HB 1989. Somewhat odd that wasn’t referenced anywhere in the article. I do agree that prevention and enforcement of the new existing law is a step in the right direction. The drone program however looks like an endless money pit game. They paint their cartoons and we follow them around to paint over it. Whack a mole. The proposed “artist-in-residence program” sounds like a taxpayer funded art gallery and will not address the main issue.
Rather put the money and staff to work notifying law enforcement to catch the perps in the act! There is not a stretch of I-5 that doesn’t have a CCTV watching it. The article noted it would take more money to upgrade the system to record in real time. This would be a requirement to uphold the law in court. However I’ve seen many TV news stories with recorded video.
These perps operate under the anonymity of nightfall so that lessens the timeline required to staff a task force to catch and prosecute these vandals.
Of course, it always comes back to money and staffing issues but
fingers crossed we can realistically reduce this plight on our societal senses.
I have a plan to suggest. Equip some of the drones with night vision technology and really strong pepper spray to hunt down and squirt lots of the “artists” caught in the act of vandalism. Or better yet, catch the idiots and put them in little graffiti cleaning chain gangs as punishment.