City unveils updated waterfront vision for 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan

Attendees examine the conceptual art and proposed changes for the Edmonds waterfront.

The City of Edmonds Planning and Development Department presented its latest update of the Waterfront Vision Conceptual Design Workshop at the Edmonds Waterfront Center Thursday – part of the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update. The presentation covered the proposed designs of Edmonds Waterfront to improve walkability, accessibility and preservation of the Edmonds Marsh. 

“We have a unique opportunity because we actually have very few owners of properties in the waterfront area,” said Edmonds Planning and Development Director Susan McLaughlin. She pointed out that the Port of Edmonds  owns the new Port of Edmonds building as well as the Harbor Square Business Complex, while the city owns the parks near the waterfront. Unocal Corporation owns the land south of the Edmonds Marsh and north of Point Edwards condominiums.

Planning and Development Director Susan McLaughlin answers questions from attendees before the presentation.

The city sponsored a design charette involving more than 90 Edmonds residents in March, and McLaughlin highlighted some of priorities identified  from that event, including:

  • Preserving the natural character of the waterfront.
  • Creating a “pedestrian-centric” environment where people can walk, bike or scooter between downtown Edmonds and the waterfront.
  • Reducing car reliance.
  • Supporting retail and civic uses, such as pop-up stores, food trucks, cafes and plazas.
  • Managing the risks associated with climate change and sea level rise
  • Create first-aid centers and lifeguard stations.

Urban Design

 

A comparison of the open green spaces at the waterfront and the marsh. Additional green spaces will be added during the Edmonds Marsh Loop development.

McLaughlin said that one major element that most Edmonds residents want is to improve walkability at the waterfront so that it connects people to several major landmarks in the area, including the marsh, Edmonds Waterfront Center, Port of Edmonds, Cascadia Art Museum, Salish Crossing shops and restaurants, Brackett’s Landing, Marina Beach Park and Willow Creek. The plan would also prioritize green space over vehicle space. 

“We want to incorporate waterfront, family-friendly activities,” she said. “Yes, there’s the beach, but what else? What can kids play on and interact with?” Other identified activities include kayaking and paddleboarding, bird-watching, and walking and biking. Adding amenities such as public restrooms and community spaces would encourage people to linger, McLaughlin said.

In addition to having outdoor spaces for seasonal events and music and cultural festivals, it’s important to ensure that local Indigenous tribes receive “culturally appropriated art and representation,” McLaughlin added. These tribes include the Snohomish, the Duwamish and other Coast Salish tribes

“We know our tribes didn’t actually have settlements in this area; however, it’s an important migratory area for the tribal gathering and fishing,” she said. 

Other urban design elements include:

  • Supporting designs that blend with the surroundings while preserving the waterfront’s unique identity and charm.
  • Having murals, sculptures and cultural exhibits that reflects local heritage and character.
  • Engaging with local artists, architects and designers to gather ideas.
  • Using sustainable designs, such as solar energy, recycled materials and green infrastructure.

Ecology

An aerial view of Edmonds waterfront, including the land owned by Unocal south of the marsh.

The Waterfront Vision includes several public spaces for people to interact with and learn about the marsh restoration. These include observation decks and designated pathways to prevent habitat destruction. Such pathways would be an Edmonds Marsh Loop, a boardwalk that loops around the marsh that is similar to the Scriber Lake trail in Lynnwood.

The city plans to establish natural buffers to mitigate sea-level rise and flooding while collaborating with coastal and wetland ecology experts and monitoring climate impacts. “By 2100, sea levels in Washington are likely to rise 1.5 to 2.5 feet,” McLaughlin said. “We’re already seeing [coastal flooding] and increases in storm surges and salinity change.”

Waterfront access and integration

The Edmonds Marsh Loop would offer a place for people to walk around Edmonds Marsh, which would include observation decks, educational signs and bird-watching opportunities.

The Waterfront Vision proposes several walkways to allow people better access between the waterfront and downtown Edmonds. One solution is to create a “multimodal hub” that supports different transportation modes, such as rideshare and bike facilities, public transit, designated parking areas with electric charging stations and pedestrian-only areas.

“We need to tell people how they can seamlessly connect to non-motorized options to stay at the local level,” McLaughlin said.

Proposed new pedestrian crossings or bridges that connect downtown Edmonds to the waterfront. These crossings may be at James Street and Alder Street.

In addition to the Edmonds Marsh Loop, McLaughlin proposed a network of pathways and trails around the waterfront and the marsh. This includes: 

  • Pedestrian access to the waterfront at James Street and Alder Street.
  • A pedestrian bridge that connects Salish Crossing, the Sounder station and waterfront center somewhere between Dayton Street and Main Street.
  • Adding bike lanes on Railroad Avenue.
  • Adding more signaled intersections from downtown Edmonds to the waterfront.

The Waterfront Vision also proposed several public plazas within Salish Crossing and Harbor Square and “pocket parks” along the waterfront boardwalk for pop-up uses. It also supports the expansion of the Willow Creek Salmon & Watershed Education Center and the creation of Edmonds Marsh Visitor Education Center.

McLaughlin emphasized that some of the land where changes are proposed are on private property, which depends on partnerships, investments and regulations to find common grounds between the city and landlords.

“Property owners will always have a final say about what they do with their land, when they do it, how they fund it,” she said. “Cities are obligated to create long-term visions for land in accordance with the Growth Management Act and alignment with the community. So we set that vision and that vision will have some parameters. Some of the vision will set the direction for future code amendments which will regulate what happens on private land.”

The results of the attendees’ votes asking if the City of Edmonds is moving in the right direction when it comes to urban redevelopment.

Attendees voted online after the presentation, during which 30 people partially agreed to the direction the City of Edmonds is taking, 20 people voted yes and two people voted no. Many commented in the online survey that they would like to see less traffic and more pedestrian-friendly spaces to travel.

Artist Carol Rashawnna Williams was not able to attend the event, but she will be attending the Mayors Climate Protection Committee meeeting on June  20. She will be creating artwork relating to sea-level rise as part of the Waterfront Vision. Contact the Planning Board for details attending the committee: Planning@edmondswa.gov.

— Story and photos by Nick Ng



  1. I think everyone can agree that that Edmonds should preserve the quality of life and environment of the waterfront.
    Creating a “pedestrian-centric” environment where people can walk, bike or scooter between downtown Edmonds and the waterfront in theory sounds fine and definitely fits the dogma of the “war against cars”. The bonus of these policy is it will jam up limited downtown parking further and even better keep the riffraff or rabble down from other Edmonds neighborhoods like Perrinville, Westgate, Yost, Highway 99, Seaview, etc. visiting and of course those pesky tourists which are too cumbersome for reasonable pedestrian solutions. The elderly or those with mobility issues will probably have fewer choices but, maybe the city can set up a virtual on-line camera to view so that they can enjoy the waterfront that way, because of limited vehicle access.

  2. It is sad that the city planning designers chose not to have any references to enabling willow creek to flow openly into the sound. When the charrette was conducted, most attendees said that this was desired. Whilst these plans are supporting green open space, there is no help to salmon restoration if there is no open pathway to the sound.
    ‘Natural’ buffers sounds much better than levys or dikes to deal with expected sea level rise.

  3. Sad that I wasn’t able to attend but so grateful to MyEdmondsNews for covering this in such great detail. Any idea where I can we go to see the full info boards that were presented, including the keys for each so we know what all of the little numbers on these images are for?

  4. How will these “design details” be incorporated into the update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and WHO is intended to be paying for it? The City has financial problems that will linger for many, many years due to past over-hiring, overspent budgets, and infrastructure problems such as the currently dysfunctional sewage treatment plant (which is also located in the Waterfront area). Shouldn’t this Comp Plan update focus on what NEEDS to be changed in the Comp Plan to allow for future development and planning (or prevent certain types of land use via zoning) rather than getting into minutia that neither the City, the Port, or taxpayers can afford?

    Further, the City has already committed to purchasing the Unocal property and to use the property for restoring an open tidal connection to Puget Sound. Is there some “secret” for avoiding mention of this and the NEED TO CHANGE ZONING of the Unocal property to ‘Open Space’ in both the Comp Plan update and the Shoreline Master Plan? We know there will be purchase issues with the Unocal property, but shouldn’t this Comp Plan update be DEFINITIVE on the City’s intended use of that property (and it’s not for a defunct ferry terminal relocation as currently stated in the Comp Plan).

  5. The proposed Sustainability Goals includes a new one that states the City’s intended use of the Marsh, Unocal and adjacent lands. It states:

    Policy A.3. NEW policy to protect and restore the Edmonds Marsh Estuary by establishing a regional wildlife sanctuary and recreation area in the southern end of the Edmonds Waterfront that includes the Edmonds Marsh-Estuary, the Unocal/WSDOT property, Marina Beach, and Willow Creek Parks.

    This policy needs our full support and an overlay designation would help to make this clear. However, as Bill Alexander mentions this does not make clear that “restoration” means an open channel connection the Marsh-Estuary to the Sound to ensure clear fish passage. This is essential and this policy needs to make this clear and be moved to the yet to be developed Waterfront goals and policies.

  6. Thanks, Ron for pointing out that “new” policy. This Comp Plan update is so convoluted, most citizens have no idea what is and isn’t being proposed. However, it doesn’t explain why that new “policy” isn’t displayed in the design concepts and that the ‘root’ of it is supposedly restoring an open saltwater channel.

    But, now a question, will that new policy prevent placement of affordable housing on the old Unocal property? If so, why is housing on the Unocal property IN THE Growth Alternatives currently being analyzed for the DEIS? Is this apparent ‘intent’ to put affordable housing on the Unocal site the ‘reason’ why McLaughlin is avoiding the ‘Open Space’ rezoning issue for the old Unocal site?

  7. And thanks to you as well as leading the charge to restore the Marsh!!! Plans when divided by topics, i.e. Land Use or Sustainability can be convoluted. Geographic elements are more useful in my experience. The Marsh policy is in the Sustainability section but should be in a Waterfront specific section. I and others have been urging this in order to bring all the waterfront specfic policies together in one place so the plan is not so convoluted. Goals and policies are being developed for the waterfront “vision” and the marsh policy should be moved there. Such a Waterfront element will fill the void left by the deletion of the dead Edmonds Crossing sections being removed.

    As for your second question about development, all the reported comments and those added at the June 4th Waterfront meeting were opposed to any more development along the waterfront. A suggestion for a hotel west of the tracks was clearly opposed. Nothing has been suggested about any housing of any kind on the Unocal land. I suspect it is being anlayized in the DEIS because it is a longshot idea and that impact analysis will give us a chance to oppose it and show it has or will have very negative impacts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.