State officials rolled out a program Monday providing a one-time $200 credit on electricity bills of up to 675,000 low- and moderate-income households in Washington.
Funded with proceeds from the state’s auction of pollution credits, it’s the most visible investment yet from the Climate Commitment Act, a 2021 law that critics say is driving up energy costs for consumers and is targeted for repeal with an initiative on the November ballot.
“There’s one reason and one reason only we’ve been able to do this. It’s because we have the Climate Commitment Act,” Gov. Jay Inslee said Monday. “It’s a big deal for families in this income bracket.”
Washington will use $150 million of auction proceeds to fund the Washington Families Clean Energy Credits program.
The state Department of Commerce will distribute the money in the form of grants to electric utility companies, which will award credits to eligible customer accounts. Credits are limited to one per household and will be applied to electric bills no later than Sept. 15.
Those who are already enrolled in a utility company’s low-income assistance program will automatically get the credit. Anyone else who may fit the criteria should apply online.
Credits will go first to those living at or below 80% of the area’s median income. Those with incomes up to 150% of the area median income could receive one, if the money stretches that far. You can go to this state website to see if you might be eligible.
Homeowners and renters can apply as long as the electric utility account is in their name, or someone in their household. It is open to all households, regardless of citizenship.
The Climate Commitment Act passed in 2021, and it’s arguably the state’s most ambitious policy for curbing greenhouse gas emissions by putting a price on pollution.
Under the law, the state imposes annual limits on emissions for major emitters and requires them to buy allowances at auctions for each metric ton of pollution. Over time the state lowers the limit, or cap, for them. Washington has a goal of erasing fossil fuel emissions statewide by mid-century.
The current two-year state budget is the first in which the governor and lawmakers are spending auction proceeds.
Inslee first pitched the electricity bill credit in December. Lawmakers earmarked the money in the supplemental state budget to pay for it. At the time, Republicans, who opposed the law in 2021, cried foul, saying that the issuance of rebates ahead of November smacked of electioneering.
Because the program is intended to be done by mid-September, it won’t be affected by Initiative 2117, which would erase the law if passed on the fall ballot.
On Monday, Brian Heywood, founder of Let’s Go Washington, the political committee behind the initiative, said the utility rebates were being used to “bribe” people into keeping the Climate Commitment Act.
Hours before Inslee’s event, Heywood and other backers of Initiative 2117 gathered at a gas station in Richland to argue the cost of complying with the law is driving up the price of fuel. For two hours, the station’s price dropped to $3.50 a gallon, the national average, with Let’s Go Washington covering the markdown.
“Inslee has created a program where taxes take thousands out of voter’s paychecks, then a couple hundred dollars are offered back to them to try to make up for it,” Heywood said in a statement. “Government greed is at an all time high and we’ve had enough of the most regressive tax in state history.”
But supporters of the utility credits say rebates are an important step in alleviating the costs of a clean energy transition for many households.
Patience Malaba, executive director at the Housing Development Consortium, said Monday that there are many families across Washington that are burdened by high energy costs and they need support from the state in order to help fight climate change.
“The clock is ticking and we do not have much time,” she said. “The future of our children is hanging in the balance.”
Inslee on Monday also pointed to other ways that the state is helping low income families lower their energy costs, such as providing more low-cost insulation, heat pumps, solar panels and free transit rides – funded by the Climate Commitment Act.
“I think Washingtonians are against pollution, and I think they believe we should help some of our low-income folks,” he said.
— By Jerry Cornfield, Washington State Standard
Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: info@washingtonstatestandard.com. Follow Washington State Standard on Facebook and X.
Please, everyone , vote no on 2117.
We can not go backwards on the issue of climate change.
The funds from 2117 have been put to good use to combat and prepare for climate change.
Thank you.
As I’ve repeatedly messaged the Governor, the idea of cutting carbon output is awesome. The legislation he came up with isn’t equitable, nor is the 1 time $200 rebate. You’re putting lipstick on a pig, rather than writing an equitable bill for voters. Rural residents aren’t provided recycling by trash haulers in this state. It should be a requirement for them to operate in the state. That would reduce energy use immensely, create jobs, and a useful service. I hear my neighbors dumping bottles & cans in the trash weekly. It’s sad to be honest.
So I’m going to take $500 a year away from you, but if you allow me to continue to do this I will give some of you a one time rebate of $200. That makes perfect sense. NOT
Had our tax money been used wisely and as promised in the first place this vote wouldn’t be necessary. But it wasn’t and that 200 bucks will probably go to few people as the income bracket is in the range of folks that are already eligible in WA state for all kinds of help with rent with utilities and food and all that I am glad we have that for people below the income. 80% below the median income in WA state is I would estimate about 15 grand a year after taxes. So too bad about the let’s see what is a nice way of saying nice try bringing this up a few months before the New Governor is elected. Hum. Randy is correct in what he says. I will be voting Yes on 2117 and see afterwards what other ideas our new Governor comes up with. The other incentives are just not enough first you must qualify and it’s a high amount for so many. Second it doesn’t pay enough to encourage or help those barely getting by as it is. Now if the Governor wants to give say a hundred grand to every taxpayer in WA regardless of income bracket, I bet everyone would do the Heat Pump, Solar grids, Electric or Hybrid cars.