Council hears more staff budget cut proposals; recognizes Edmonds woman serving as Miss Washington

Hermona Girmay, center, with her family after receiving a proclamation from Edmonds Mayor Mike Rosen. Pictured L-R: mother Aster Miner and brothers Eyasu and Nathaniel Girmay.

In a meeting lasting more than four hours, city department heads finished their 2025 budget presentations to the Edmonds City Council, again highlighting the difficult choices ahead for addressing the city’s budget woes.

The council also honored Edmonds native Hermona Girmay, who was crowned Miss Washington 2024 in July and will compete in the Miss America event in Orlando, Florida Dec. 31-Jan. 5. Girmay, who attended Holy Rosary School and graduated from Edmonds-Woodway High School, is a 2023 cum laude and departmental honors graduate of the University of Washington. Her Community Service Initiative, “SHECAN: Support Her Education, Change A Nation,” encompasses her 10-plus years of girls’ education equality activism inspired by her family’s journey to the U.S. as refugees.

And the council unanimously approved a 1% increase in both a property tax and emergency medical services (EMS) levy, the maximum allowed annually under state law.

Girmay’s appearance was a bright spot during an evening of detailed budget discussions. In his Oct. 1 budget address, Mayor Mike Rosen proposed a combination of staff reductions, job furloughs and revenue-generating ideas to close the city’s projected $13 million budget gap in 2025. Rosen has asked city staff to address half that gap with $7 million in budget cuts.

Tuesday night’s presentations were from information technology, municipal court, planning and development and public works departments. Other city departments had shared their proposed budgets to the council during earlier meetings. All of the budgets included proposals for essentially doing more with less — including not filling vacant positions and laying off some existing employees. The cuts combined with proposed job furloughs for nonrepresented staff will mean increased workloads for those remaining — but councilmembers and department directors also acknowledged the human cost of the budget cuts.

“It’s very hard to hear that again, one of our staff members is up for elimination,” Councilmember Jenna Nand said after Information Technology Manager Brian Tuley proposed cutting the part-time position of Jerrie Bevington — a familiar face in the council chambers who operates the video cameras for Edmonds City Council meetings. Tuley proposed that Bevington’s work could be replaced by selecting pre-programmed camera positions that would be operated by the city clerk during meetings.

Other money-saving ideas from the IT Department: eliminating Microsoft Outlook licenses for boards and commissions and extending the life cycle of existing hardware. Tuley also pointed to the increasing costs of software and licensing, calling it an “era of extreme greed by technology companies.” For example, the city spent $67,000 on Microsoft licensing in 2020; that same licensing cost $169,000 in 2024 — a 152% increase. Adobe’s price went from $4,000 to $21,000 during that same time frame — a 675% jump. By comparison, food costs have increased 25% since 2020, he said.

The Edmonds Municipal Court budget was presented by Judge Neil Weiss and Court Administrator Uneek Maylor. Weiss noted the unique role of the court in city government, with a mission of “providing community access to justice with trust and integrity.” The court represents just 3% of the city’s general fund budget, he added.

As part of its proposed budget reductions, the court will be laying off one of its two probation officers, which led Councilmember Chris Eck to ask how that position will be backfilled in case of illness or vacation. Maylor said that the assistant court administrator is a former probation officer who can fill in, and added she also has been trained as probation officer. However, Maylor expressed concern about overall court staffing and how those remaining employees will absorb the work, especially when staff will also be taking furlough days. Another unknown for the court next year is how the introduction of red light cameras at two Edmonds intersections — which the Edmonds City Council approved earlier this year — will impact their workload. Weiss has proposed additional staffing of 2.76 full-time equivalent employees — funded through the red light camera revenue — to cover the added work the cameras will bring.

Councilmember Michelle Dotsch asked what impact the city’s new school zone cameras have had on the court and Maylor replied that it was a staffing strain to process the citations generated. To address that extra work, the court has cut its passport services to one day a week — and may need to eliminate them altogether, she added.

Weiss also spoke to the possible elimination of the Highway 99 Neighborhood Office, which has hosted community court for those who may find it difficult to access the municipal court building in downtown Edmonds. “The loss of that space does not mean the loss of our community court,” Weiss said. “If that space does not continue to have funding…our community court will continue. We’re still looking at other alternatives about where that could go and what that would look like.”

Shane Hope, acting director of planning and development, spoke to her department’s planned budget cuts of 4.5%, which include not filling an existing planner position and moving a full time administrative assistant to part time. The department would also cut its professional services budget, reducing by $50,000 the money allocated for waterfront visioning and by $62,000 the budget allocated for neighborhood action planning by $62,000.

Hope reminded the council that the department does generate significant revenues from permits, with approximately $1.4 million collected annually from 2020 to 2023.

The presentations concluded with the city’s largest department: public works and utilities. Acting Director Phil Williams said that the department has a $72 million budget with 95.25 FTEs. Much of its funding comes from ratepayers, so just $5.82 million — or about 8% — is in the general fund. Among the budget savings mentioned:

Photo courtesy City of Edmonds

The facilities maintenance division, which maintains city-owned buildings, plans to lay off one of its custodial staff. The division also cited range of other cost-saving efforts that include:

– Increasing use of energy conservation devices 

– Using energy auditing to identify savings measures

– Centralized waste pick-up

– Reducing cleaning and sanitation intervals at city buildings

– Reducing custodial operational hours by 28% at many locations

– Eliminating deskside trash and recycling pick up at all city buildings

– Increasing lighting and electrical conservation devices to minimize utility consumption and comply with new energy codes.

Engineering will eliminate its student intern program, the ORCA commute trip reduction program and partially reduce overtime, along with other cuts.

Photo courtesy City of Edmonds

The street/storm division: Street maintains and improves 133 miles of rights-of-way, including streets, roadways and alleys, while storm staff conduct system maintenance, street sweeping, emergency flooding response, creek maintenance, and minor capital improvement projects. Street/storm had several vacancies this year, due to both long-term medical and retirements, Williams said. There is also a vacancy in operations that has not been filled, he added. Such staffing shortages, while beneficial for budget savings, are likely to impact the city once winter weather arrives — resulting in slower response times and more selective road plowing.

Supported by ratepayers, the water division includes operation, maintenance and delivery of potable water to customers. The sewer operations division is responsible for the repair, maintenance and operation of 14 pump stations, 3,200 sewer manholes, and over 186 miles of sewer mains. The sewer division’s treatment plant operations provides wastewater treatment to 80% of Edmonds residents, all of Mountlake Terrace, all of Olympic View Water and Wastewater District, and much of Shoreline.

Fleet provides vehicles and equipment to support city operations, and includes the following proposed budget savings:

– Extend replacement intervals

– Reduce outsourced labor costs

– Reduce overall fleet assets

– Minimize material costs

– Maximize efficiencies to increase turnaround time

– Extend maintenance intervals

In addition, the division has identified $77,000 in expense cuts.

In other business, the council also held a public hearing on the city’s 2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. Just one person testified: Edmonds resident Joe Scordino suggested that the city consider having employees scheduled for layoffs due to general fund challenges to instead work on capital projects, “and keep some of the great people we have in this city.”

Due to the lateness of the hour, a council discussion on a 2024 budget amendment ordinance was postponed to next week’s meeting.

The council will hold an interactive public hearing on the budget during its Tuesday, Oct. 29 meeting, with Mayor Rosen and Finance Director Kim Dunscombe answering questions from the public. You can learn more here.

— By Teresa Wippel

 

  1. Can somebody please explain what “Waterfront Visioning Professional Services” is? If $50,000 constitutes a 4.5% reduction of the original cost (provided I did the math correctly), that means we were pay over a million dollars for those services. What were we getting for that amount of money?

    1. Hi Florence — I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong but the 4.5% is how much planning and development department is reducing its budget overall. As part of that, they are proposing reducing the amount spent on waterfront visioning. Here’s what the powerpoint said: “Further studies for waterfront visioning was recommended by the prior P & D Director. Because we are now looking at a collaborative approach to identifying planning needs with the Port and other key stakeholders over the next year, we could eliminate about 2/3 of the professional services budgeted for this and refocus the topic to be only for waterfront studies that need technical analysis or environmental review in 2025.”

  2. Has anyone considered reducing the number of council positions from 7 to 5? All of the departments are being asked to make cuts. Maybe the council could as well and share the burden of these cuts rather than just administer them.

    1. Mr. McDonald, we do not have the power to change the number of council members. Edmonds is a non-charter code city operating under state law, RCW Title 35A. Section 35A.12.020 reads, for code cities with a population over 2,500, “the council shall consist of seven members.”

    1. City Council is paid so little, less than state minimum wage for part-time work, savings would be minimal. And I doubt you can furlough an elected official who swore an oath to do the job for a term of years. Better we just ask City Council to do their job resolving the current budget crisis.

      Their budget book is 193 pages long; this is major work and tough to get right. Council needs to “spread the pain.” Resist the pressure to minimize cuts and maximize higher taxes for Edmonds citizens.

  3. This is all smoke and mirrors. And the Council doesn’t know how to see through it.

    Most departments are not clearly identifying how much of their budget is attributed to the General Fund and what is not. While the General Fund is our largest account, it’s just one of 32 different accounts the city manages to provide us services. However, the General Fund is in the most trouble and we should all be concerned about (think large tax increases on the horizon). By now I would have expected councilmembers to ask for this delineation of where the savings are coming from, however, they haven’t. How much of the “savings” that each department is identifying is from the General Fund?

    And if you look at the actual budget book that the mayor presented to the Council, I can’t find $7M in savings in the General Fund. The Council doesn’t adopt presentations when they vote on the budget, they adopt a budget book. Someone help connect the dots, please.

  4. Hi Teresa,
    Thank you for your clarification regarding the $ amounts. However, I’m still unclear about what is meant by “Waterfront Visioning Professional Services” . I hope it doesn’t mean we are paying consultants to come up with a “vision” for how to best utilize our waterfront.

    1. “Waterfront Visioning Professional Services.” Well, I certainly hope the consultants hired for this work are a local business and not a business from another state.

      Dean Jackson

  5. As council discuss cuts or new revenues (not property taxes) there will always be supports and naysayers. But let’s look at the alternate to close the budget gap, new property taxes. Edmonds GF is around $51m with about $15m coming from Property Taxes. PT’s are assessed on the Assessed Value of all our property. The current AV for Edmonds is around $15.4Billion.

    Her are some ways to create $1m.
    1. Cancel things we buy, consultants, vehicles building maintenance etc.
    2. Lay off people, 8-9 people cost about $1m
    3. Fines, fees, charge for parking or other charges. A red-light camera may produce around $1m.
    4. Add 1/10 of 1% sales tax generates about $1.3m
    5. Property Tax at a rate of $.07/1000 or about $70 for a $1m home.
    To pay off the planned loans to balance 2025, replenish the reserves, and to close the gap between revs and exps, will require some or all of the above.

    The article points out a new from of public hearing on Oct 29th. Ask a question, get an answer, and get council members to comment. Folks should thoughtfully think about ideas and then show up and ask the questions.
    Council will not solve our budget gap of X without doing some or all of the above. We can help.

  6. What really happens with our City Government is the state makes a whole bunch of Growth Management Act Planning demands for 20 years down the road that are totally unfunded. Then the state takes over local zoning to tell the City government how and where all basic housing will occur, negating what has always been a Municipal power of decision making – again unfunded as to implementation in any way. Next our City Planners scream, “I’m over worked and need thousands of dollars to hire consultants to form all the unfunded plans the State requires.” The City Council rubber stamps more funding for all this. We elect Mayors who have little to no clue about how to run a non-profit, service oriented organization (City) and Part-time City Council Persons who have little to no clue about setting and administrating budgets for a large organization and are mostly busy making an actual living for themselves elsewhere. What could possibly go wrong with this system of “doing” things? We are so bogged down in “planning” that actually “doing” becomes almost impossible. On top of all that our CC agrees to fund things certain people just want instead of what everyone just needs, creating higher costs for upkeep of the new infrastructure and neglect of the old infrastructure.

  7. Interesting summary but what’s next. Anyone have some specific suggestions that will add revenues or cut costs? It always seems that few who comment on this or that are not telling us what this or that does. Of the 5 listed above council is working on at least 4 of them. They may be considering number 4 but not sure.

    What has been discussed so far is some use of the others but do we as taxpayers want more or less of some items?

    Discussing now may give insight to what we may want to ask at the upcoming special meeting.

  8. Well, Darrol, our own police chief (who is pretty handsomely compensated by the way) has suggested that we could save around 40% on police service if we went with a County Contract system. If you look at the budget pie chart you can see that, that would be a significant amount of required spending accounted for. We have some pretty nice city parks with facilities that everyone uses free. I’d be willing to pay for an annual family or individual city park pass for say $30,00/Yr. When I go to Seattle to launch my boat into LK. WA. at their park I have to pay them $12.00 for it. So, how about fences around the Petanque Courts, Basketball and Tennis Courts, and skate board facility where you either use your annual city pass (available to non-citizens as well as citizens) or pay a reasonable fee, say $5.00 or such. That doesn’t sound unfair to me. We have one of the worlds best dog parks and one of a very few under water parks anywhere. Should their use just be free to all? Selling the Wade James property is almost a no brainer. Or; re-start our own basic Fire Service and offer a private EMS service use of the Wade James property for free in exchange for providing the service. No need to thank me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.