You can watch the video of Mayor Rosen’s address and review the budget document here
Edmonds Mayor Mike Rosen presented his 2025 budget proposal at the Edmonds Waterfront Center Tuesday night in front of a combined live and virtual audience of 150. (Readers may wish to follow along with the mayor’s PowerPoint presentation as they read this story.)
“We’re creating a budget for a city with 42,000 folks,” Rosen began. “It’s hard to get it perfect for everyone. It’s a little like trying to create the perfect chocolate chip cookie – some want more chocolate, some want crisp, some want soft. That’s a challenge in itself, but what if you can’t even afford all the ingredients? That’s where we are today with the budget. There’s simply not enough revenue to do everything that our citizens would like us to do.”
He went on to stress that no one person caused this situation, no single group is responsible, it didn’t happen in a single year, it wasn’t due to one specific action, and – most importantly – no single action can fix it.
“Our long-range goal is to build a budget for the city we want, not shred what we have,” he added. “And we aren’t there yet.”
He went on to lay out guiding principles for the budget. Engaging the public every step of the way and budgeting by priorities top the list, which also includes being conservative with assumptions and projections, no hiding from the hard choices, and spreading/sharing the pain. Five strategies will guide the work: cut costs where we can, save money when we can, sell what we can live without, borrow money to carry us through the crisis, and look for ways to increase revenues, the mayor said.
“This is the result of lots of work by city staff, elected officials and citizens to get us where we are tonight,” said Rosen, who shared the following slide of the activities and processes that went into shaping the draft budget proposal:
A big part of this effort was setting budget priorities. Along with the Edmonds City Council’s budget priorities of safety, environment, investment, livability and economic resiliency, there was another major force shaping the process: The public survey where citizens identified the following as their top priorities: Housing affordability, Crime/Public Safety, Overdevelopment/Growth and Budget/Fiscal Responsibility.
The survey data were also used to generate a gap analysis comparing how survey respondents ranked the importance of various priorities compared with their satisfaction with how the city is meeting these. In this chart below, the grey bars indicate how well the city is doing in meeting the priorities, the blue the relative importance, and on the right the satisfaction gap, i.e., where respondents felt the city was overperforming or underperforming. At opposite ends of the scale were bike lanes, where respondents felt the city was placing too much emphasis, to reducing petty crime and burglary, where they felt the city was falling far short.
Rosen then got into the numbers.
For 2024, the city projected revenues of a little more than $51 million. But unexpected expenses combined with one-time use of ARPA funds and a council-approved deficit pushed the actual budget expenses up by an additional $10 million. Add to that the city’s depleted reserves, combined with inaccurate estimations/projections, and Edmonds was left with a $20 million budget hole:
Adding to this, the mayor pointed out a list of things that the city hasn’t been doing but should be, including deferred maintenance and hiring more police:
“This is all about choices,” he explained. “For example, we have 91 miles of roads without sidewalks – building these would cost a staggering $750 million. To meet the national average of police to number of residents, we’d need to add 33 new officers at a cost of more than $4 million. We need to make the hard choices. It comes down to what’s important to us, what we want, and what we’re willing to pay for.”
And then there’s the next problem: 2025
The current draft proposal projects a $13 million gap between costs and revenues for 2025:
“To help close this gap, I asked staff to come up with half of it – $7 million – in cuts,” he explained. “Some of the impacts of these cuts would be defunding 46 positions – people in them would lose their jobs – no beach rangers or summer day camp, reduced staff, and selling some of our vehicles. And there’s more.
Among the impacts of the proposed cuts:
- Furloughing all non-represented staff for 12 days
- Not funding 46 positions, meaning people will lose their jobs.
- Closing the Edmonds City Hall satellite office on Highway 99.
- One fewer animal control officer
- Switching from a Zoom streaming platform to Microsoft Teams.
- Reduced human resources and finance department staff.
- One less court probation officer.
- Reduced overtime.
“Remember that this is just a proposal,” he cautioned. “Council can and will make changes, and they’ll be engaging with this until late November.
The mayor next introduced Acting Finance Director Kim Dunscombe, who provided a more detailed breakdown of the city general fund versus expenses that form the basis of the 2025 budget assumptions.
“Our goal is to better align our spending with what we value most,” Dumscombe explained. “Note in the key assumptions slide that we are assuming annexation to the RFA (Regional Fire Authority), and an interfund loan of $7.5 million in 2025. That combined with the department cuts described by the mayor will cover the projected deficit. We’re also assuming salary increases up to 3.8%, increasing court staff, and hiring an emergency management coordinator and a grant analyst.
She went on to explain that with property taxes – the city’s largest single source of revenue – capped by law at a 1%- per-year increase – an opportunity to get more from that source is severely limited. The city has also mostly exhausted its ability to raise utility taxes, despite revenues from this source going down due to conservation and deceased usage. People are simply not using as much of these services as they once did, which is good for conservation, but bad for revenue.
“The bottom line for us is that we have few opportunities for revenue diversification, and this leaves us vulnerable to economic downturns,” she added.
Regarding Edmonds’ spending priorities, she pointed out that the proposal reflects the city’s commitment to public safety, with police and fire remaining top funding priorities.
Mayor Rosen then returned to the podium to address the final piece of the budget proposal: How to get more money through revenue enhancement.
“As you saw from Kim’s presentation, property tax is our major source of revenue,” he began. “But for every dollar you pay in property tax, only about 14 cents comes to the city. Another major revenue source – sales tax– is also limited. At the current rate, for every dollar you spend on goods and services in Edmonds you pay about 10.5 cents in sales tax, but less than a penny of this comes to the city. So, we’re looking at other sources, and have some initial ideas. I’ve grouped them into four areas: Ways we could increase what we collect from existing sources, new sources we could introduce, things we own that we could sell, and other sources. Some of these have promise, some don’t – they’re tough choices, but these are the kinds of things we’re talking about.”
He also pointed out things that are not on the table – things we must do by law or are core expectations of city government.
The mayor’s presentation concluded with a timeline of next steps. The first of these is Thursday evening, Oct. 3, when the public is invited to engage with councilmembers on the budget at an event hosted by the Edmonds Civic Roundtable at the Edmonds Waterfront Center, followed by city department budget presentations in October, public hearings in November and potential city council budget adoption Nov. 26.
More details are available on the City budget website.
— Story and photos by Larry Vogel
We have the right mayor.
Yes. And I’m grateful for that.
well stated, Mr. Croake
We ought to get really upset when Edmonds talks about lack of residential sidewalks ( at a potential cost of $750 million) as a “city issue”. Most new residential neighborhoods are required to have sidewalks and the purchase price of the new home includes the cost for installation of a sidewalk. People make choices for a Less expensive home in neighborhoods without sidewalks. Historically When a neighborhood wants sidewalks a Local Improvement District (LID) was formed and these neighborhood voted to charge themselves with a government backed low interest debt and they paid for the improvements to their neighborhood and the resulting increase in their homes worth.
agree 100%. he’s claiming we need nearly a billion dollars to pour some concrete. Are we financing a space program too? It sounds like just an excuse to continue neglecting our neighborhoods.
You pour sidewalks and you need to control roadway water (install curbs/gutters) and that water now needs to go somewhere since you presumably covered the ditch that it was running to (install catch basins/storm lines). Anything that was in the gutter line now needs to be moved since there’s a storm pipe there now (relocate telephone poles, waterlines, sanitary sewer lines, etc) and now you’ve chopped up the street pretty good, so you need to repave it.
I’ve painted a bit of a worst case – but it’s not as simple as pouring concrete.
Mike, I grew up on a dirt country road and was taught to always walk facing traffic when I was just starting to walk. Most people here have no clue. We need sidewalks to at least corral them to one area. Also, try getting around much of the city with limited mobility or a wheelchair, it’s not a pleasant experience.
Mike, When was the last time an LID was assessed in Edmonds? Maybe their time has come. How about the 4th Ave art road, that would be a perfect project to fund with an LID.
LID assessments will be the only feasible way to pay for all the road, sidewalk and utility improvements needed for the new comp plan “hubs and centers”. Anybody who disagrees should go drive around the newish hubs and centers in our neighboring cities, every bit of pavement, sidewalk and drainage is brand new. Edmonds is broke, how does the Planning Board think all that new pavement will magically appear at our hubs and centers?
Based on the Mayor’s presentation the prudent thing to do is throw out the hubs and centers approach to the Comp Plan and go to CM Dotsch’s plan which puts the growth where the infrastructure is already built.
Just when I thought the major could not disappoint more, he managed beat my expectations. A total disaster of a budget lacking ideas to realize the potential of the city and increase revenue without tax increases or sell cherished buildings like Frances Anderson.
He complains a foot of sidewalks costs 1500 dollars but never even discussed the unnecessary repaving of low use streets in the bowl which looked patched but were otherwise ok. He continues to claim they have limited options for revenue and is considering public park entrance fees, parking meters, a sales tax increase on top of the already outrageous percents we pay.
Where are the plans for increase revenue by incentivize businesses to open in neglected corridors like 99, 5 corners, firdale? Where are the plans to generate revenue from higher density residential and comply with state mandates. Where are the plans to increase density downtown with mixed use buildings that attract more economic activity.
All he presents is service cuts, continue neglecting 99 into blight, sell cherished buildings. I’ve said it before: Edmonds will worsen under Rosen. Now it has.
Glad you brought those up, Paul. You are in luck; the Comprehensive Plan update will enable those neighborhood hubs and centers to do just that and hopefully more. The challenge will be, and has historically been, to get council and the community on board with realizing the value of the land use alternatives that are being considered. I’m glad to see the council’s budget priorities of safety, environment, investment, livability and economic resiliency are at the forefront, criteria that contributed to the hubs and centers concepts, but will it be recognized come time when the comp plan needs to be adopted. Time will tell, stay tuned!
It is recognized that the mayor is attempting to manage the city’s challenging financial situation. It is not clear the Fire/EMS/Police are sharing in the pain proportionately to other priorities. Absolutely they should an important have a seat at the table, they themselves shouldn’t be eating most of the whole meal. Note, A 3.8% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) increase surpasses the 2.5% increase that Social Security recipients will receive next year. Understanding the justification for this discrepancy would be intriguing.
Medicare is going up over $10 a month, most Med Advantage plans are changing, there are also changes in Original Medicare that costs money. So, do not look for Seniors spending more. Cut the outrageous monthly City Council and the Mayors pay checks……………..
I can tell you one is federal and the other is regional. COLA is cost of living. My SSDI is based on a national average. The city would be based on the Seattle Tacoma regional average.
Police is now the largest city expenditure & the city plans for additional spend in 25′ / 26′. I support the Edmonds PD; however, data available to the public shows call volume from 2018 – 2022 are down ~18% (https://sno911.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/SNO911-Annual-Report-2023.pdf).
EPD 2023 Annual report shows a ~15% decrease in crime over 2022 -(https://www.edmondswa.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_16494932/File/Government/Departments/Police%20Department/Department%20Info/Crime%20or%20Work%20Stats%20&%20Annual%20Report/EPD2023-AnnualReport.pdf)
With the constant stream of the region’s crime problems, it’s quite possible, the public safety concerns are more of a perceived threat than an actual threat.
Let’s not forget the region’s crime problem is a recent one, and as so often reported by local news, a self-inflicted problem. Recent changes to the criminal justice system have created a revolving door for offenders. I support accountability and rehabilitation (if we can’t keep them in jail, let’s do all we can to make them into a contributing member of our community).
Nick- you’re absolutely right about the unreasonable and unsustainable cost of Edmonds police. The Mayor said Edmonds and all of the State had the lowest ratio of police officers per capita anywhere in the U.S. and that’s why they need 33 more officers. Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs 2022 report showed that Edmonds 1.19 officers per 1,000 population is the 6th highest ratio out of 25 WA cities (pop 20,000 – 60,000). According to FBI reports, Edmonds’ 1.2 officers/1,000 is right at the average for Pacific Region medium size cities. Shoreline has 51 officers serving 60,000 residents. Edmonds has 51 officers serving 42,800 residents. Crime in both cities is the same. Shoreline residents pay 40% less for police services than Edmonds. Edmonds police chief says Shoreline residents benefit from a contract with King County Sheriff’s office and there are independent studies that prove County-wide economies of scale lower costs by 50% vs. individual municipalities. Why is Edmonds Mayor and Council not doing everything to pursue this contract model with Snohomish County Sherriff, transfer their officers to the County, and reduce the budget from $15M to $10M, instead of increasing the budget to $19M in 2025? That’s a $9M savings with no hit on safety! Tough times demand innovative solutions and tighter cost control!
Why should salary increases be equal across all non-represented employee positions? A 3.8% salary increase is much higher for a Director (and our police Chief) than it is for a janitor, for example.
The compensation study done in 2012, my first year on Council, was based on salaries paid to each non-represented employee compared to the same positions in comparable cities. Based on that study, those at the lowest pay levels were significantly underpaid compared to higher level staff, especially the Directors. In order to equalize the disparities, we raised salaries of underpaid staff and allocated no increases to our Directors who were paid MORE than comparable cities. Every year through 2015, the personnel director requested “longevity” increases for the well paid Directors, which Council declined to approve.
Why not give NO salary increases to those Directors/Chief who already exceed comparable pay? Cost of living increases are most needed by lower paid staff struggling to make ends meet. A 3.8 % increase for all contributes to significant inequities in pay.
Joan Bloom
October 2, 2024 at 2:19 pm
Why should salary increases be equal across all non-represented employee positions?
I like your thinking, it is about time that elected officials stood up for the common person. I do believe that you will be thought of as a good politician with a common sense attitude by a lot of folks, but I do….
Due to 30+ years of bad management – over funding entertainment and the arts initiatives, while neglecting or even ignoring many infrastructure and environmental asset needs – we are where we are at today. The Nelson administration was bad, but the two or three ahead of him weren’t much better really; they were just better at playing the power and influence game. I’ve seen a town of trees, quaint cottages, and a working as well as playing waterfront disappear before my eyes. Then we come up with a tree code that caused the loss of hundreds of trees and a takings lawsuit we lost. Now there’s a plan for joining a Regional Fire Dept. that will cost more than if we had kept our own fire department. I’m not faulting our current mayor for asking for more property tax money and pushing this levy stuff because he has no other choice at this point. However, I have no intention of knowingly voting myself any more property taxes for anything. I’m at my fair share now. This budget, if it stands, will probably put us at total insolvency by 2028, if we don’t vote ourselves way more taxes. This mayor and this council will solve nothing because they trust the advice of the wrong people.
It’s interesting that the bi-annual 2025-2026 budget includes of projections $6,100,000 dollars for red light camera revenues. (School zone and intersection red light cameras). Who would have thought that the Edmonds is so overrun with desperados and bandits roaming the streets? Certainly, it was all about safety, and not because the city is desperate for money. Indubitably.
I should add that this money is going into the general fund instead of specific dedicated safety improvements. Go figure.
There are several ways to generate $1m for the city budget. A property tax of $70 for a $1M home is one way. Making a cut somewhere in the budget is another way and with the average FTE cost of $115,000 it would require laying off 8-9 people. Another way to generate $1 is one or more of the combinations of revenue ideas outlined in the mayor’s presentation. Red light cameras are but one way for new non-PT revenues. Raising fees, parking fees, other mitigation fees, stop using MFTE, and the list goes on. Each of the 3 basic ways PT, Cuts, or new non-PT revenues have folks who will say don’t do that! We probably need to do more of the “share the pain” and do some of all 3.
Council is responsible for making these tough choices. Tonight, at the ECR 7pm meeting at the WF center, 3 council members will be available to share their views and answer our questions. It will be an exciting conversation.
Parking meters generate revenue…
…just sayin’
Edmonds sells parking permits for downtown residents and employees. We sell about 700 each. Resident permit is about $.07/day and employee permits are $.25/day. Council sets the rate and with our need for more revenue this could be considered.
… just offering and idea.
I agree. Our streets cost us a bunch of money and parking spaces are a piece of the pie. Parking meters are consistently fair and Edmonds would benefit from the added revenue. Every little bit helps.
I understand the parking places behind buildings for employees or store owners. That considering our parking situation seems fair. So, 700 of those issued. But the other 700 issued for downtown residents. Does that mean only for people who live in the Bowl? 7 cents a day. 2.10 cents a month? Seriously? I would easily pay you 30 dollars a month for one of those resident parking places. Would someone please explain this to me a property tax paying and homeowner in Edmonds for 32 years? 30 dollars a month would bring our city based on 700 of those would bring in 252,000.00. Now that would indeed help our city. Tell me what ya think about this Edmonds Residents. Thank You.