Aerial drones helpful in removing graffiti along WA highways, agency says

A prototype drone test sprays paint to cover up graffiti in Tacoma earlier this spring. (Courtesy of the Washington State Department of Transportation)

Using aerial drones to spray paint over graffiti along state highways is “very effective,” according to a new report from Washington’s Department of Transportation.

Over the last six months, the agency has tested graffiti removal methods through a pilot program set up by the Legislature last year. Lawmakers set aside $1 million for the department to focus on new ways to erase spray paint from road signs, walls and bridges.

The agency spends thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars each year on graffiti removal.

While the drones are useful to reach spray paint in places that are dangerous or difficult to access, the agency said in its report that other maintenance needs may be higher priorities for funding.

“Graffiti removal is and will remain a challenge,” according to the report.

The amount the state spends on graffiti cleanup every year has been on the rise.

In 2023, the department’s crews spent more than $815,000 on graffiti removal statewide, the agency wrote in a blog post. The department estimates that’s nearly 10,300 hours of labor and 700,000 square feet of graffiti. Removal costs about $3,000 per tag.

At the time the pilot program passed the Legislature, sponsor Rep. Andrew Barkis, R-Olympia, said graffiti along Washington’s roads was “getting out of control.”

The program helped the agency train two drone operators and remove graffiti in the Tacoma area along Interstate 5. It also paid for equipment and supplies.

To date, the department has spent $22,000 to clean graffiti using drones and has plans to spend up to $60,000 on these efforts through June 2025.

The drone that the department is using was purchased before the Legislature allocated money toward this effort. It’s an $86,000 aircraft powered by batteries and tethered to pump paint from the ground. The department is in talks with a supplier to create a self-contained unit that holds one to two gallons of paint without a tether, which operators say can get caught on trees or billboards.

Along with using drone technology, the Legislature encouraged the department to look for ways it can use cameras to catch illegal graffiti activity, focusing mostly on the I-5 corridor between Tacoma and Seattle and the North Spokane Corridor.

Over the last six months, the agency tested four different graffiti detection devices set up in two locations in Tacoma and Spokane. The devices, which include cameras or radar, use artificial intelligence or machine learning components to recognize a graffiti tagger.

When a vandal is spotted, the devices send a notification to a traffic management center operated by the Department of Transportation.

Each device was only active for a few weeks in October due to time constraints related to when the department must spend the money provided for this work. That short period limited the opportunities for the devices to catch taggers, according to the report.

But one device in Tacoma, which was active from Oct. 9 to Nov. 5 resulted in three notifications on graffiti activity and one arrest.

“Although the number of opportunities to detect taggers in this pilot was low due to the quick turnaround, the proviso provided evidence that the technology exists to detect graffiti taggers in real time,” the report reads.

Still, funding limitations and Washington State Patrol staff shortages are constraints, the department says. And, at this point, the agency has no proposal to fund graffiti detection past next June.

— By Laurel Demokovich, Washington State Standard

Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence.

  1. Make the penalty for tagging 10 years of community service (removing tagging). Kills two birds with one stone. Slowly reduce the punks tagging and making them do the cleanup. Win win.

  2. We’ve got our own graffiti magnet here in Edmonds…the derelict Funtasia property behind Woods Coffee on Hwy 99. The code says the City can force the owner/developer to secure the property (the fences have been breached for years) and to clean up the graffiti that covers the Edmonds Parks property along the bike trail. Nice “Gateway” to Edmonds for all the bikers on the Interurban Trail!

  3. How about they alternate between using the drones to paint over graffiti with using them to tag the taggers when they see them tagging (once they go to the self contained paint technology machines). They fly along the roads until they see a tagger in action and shoot him/her down with bright yellow paint perhaps laced with skunk scent. Oh, that’s right. Tagging is now an folk art form we must respect.

  4. An ounce of prevention right?
    My suggestion is after graffiti is removed or painted over, spray a thin coat of organic oil so the paint will run and not stick.
    This could be applied everywhere the taggers could possibly do their “art” for much less than trying to catch them and/or remove existing tagging.
    I doubt they would bother cleaning the oil off and would be discouraged if the paint would not stick.

  5. I did not see anything said about arresting and making an example of those caught doing the tagging. There are also no warning signs saying that violators will be fined $1,000 or spend 10 days in jail. No consequences is the message. So this useless and destructive activity continues unabated. When word gets out that jail time will be a consequence, and the police make a dozen arrests to set an example, this activity will stop…..why stop at painting out the tags…move on to punish the vandals. This activity got worse during the Defund the Police movement. The impetus for change must come from the Mayor and City Hall. Without this, the people at the margin decree that graffiti is folk art, and you get nowhere. Personally, when I drive into the city to attend an event and see extensive graffiti, I think of vandals slinking around in the dark, breaking the law, without any thought for the people who pay taxes and find graffiti vulgar and just plain ugly. It is all the same scribbling, definitely not art.

  6. Taggers should be sentenced to five years in prison after cleaning up their damage or paying to have it fixed.

    t

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.