Climate Protection: Getting clear on how to stop global warming

Traffic jam on I-405. (File photo)

During summers in college, I worked as an orderly in psychiatric hospitals.  One day, a group of teenage patients wanted to play hearts. I had never played the game before. It sounded like fun, so I agreed. The trouble started as cards were being dealt. How many cards did each person get? Was it six? Eight? 13? 

And can you even play hearts with six people? One patient started yelling.  Another started weeping. Two started wrestling over the deck to be the dealer. Other orderlies had to come help, and everyone was sent to their rooms to recover.

The head nurse did not yell at me. She just said, “You need to be clear in your own mind about what needs to be done. That goes for taking blood pressures. That goes for getting everyone to meals, and that goes for playing cards.”

That night, my fiancé taught me how to play hearts and wrote out the rules.  The following day, the teens and I tried again, but this time I was firm about the rules, and we had a great time.

As the head nurse said, when things are chaotic or confusing, you need to get clear on what needs to be done.

Recently, things in the U.S. have been getting chaotic and confusing. On the climate protection front, the basic fact to get clear on is that we humans must stop burning coal, oil and natural gas.  

There are other things we can do about global warming besides stopping fossil fuels. Researchers who study those other approaches have seen their work get misunderstood, and they have started including explanations in their reporting.

For example, a team that studied the benefits of maintaining forests reported, “The research team stress the importance of protecting and maintaining natural carbon sinks while accepting that doing so cannot compensate for ongoing fossil fuel use.”

A team exploring how to get renewable energy up to the needed levels reported, “Just spending on our energy systems to create more investment in renewable energy is not enough if we don’t also stop fossil fuel burning.”  

A researcher exploring the possibility of a giant space parasol wrote, “I am not advocating in any way to move forward on any of these types of mitigation efforts. The best thing to do is to stop fossil fuel emissions as much as we can.”

That is one basic thing that you can keep in mind as we deal with the coming years. We must stop burning coal, oil and natural gas. 

As United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres said in 2023, action “must start with the polluted heart of the climate crisis: the fossil fuel industry…The problem is not simply fossil fuel emissions. It’s fossil fuels – period. The solution is clear: The world must phase out fossil fuels… leave oil, coal and gas in the ground where they belong.”  

And Pope Francis said, “Now is the time for new courage in abandoning fossil fuels.” 

A minimum and effective strategy to stop fossil fuels is to “buy only electric,” meaning buy only electric appliances and vehicles. This is part of Saul Griffith’s idea of “Electrify Everything.”  

Everything you own that burns gasoline or natural gas will wear out in a few decades. The electricity that gets to people’s homes in our area is already almost entirely generated without burning fossil fuels, and in a few decades, no electricity in America will involve burning coal, natural gas or gasoline. When we have only electric appliances and vehicles, we will do a lot to stop global warming.

So far, we’re doing great on natural gas. In Snohomish County, according to data from the Snohomish County Assessor’s Office, 89% of heating systems in new homes and remodels are heat pumps. That is partly because heat pumps provide air conditioning. Natural gas does not.  

We’re coming along with vehicles, but not as quickly. According to data provided by the Washington State Department of Licensing, in October to December 2024, 18% of new cars and trucks bought in the Edmonds-Lynnwood-Mountlake Terrace area were fully electric, as were 3.6% of the vehicles on the road. 

Used car sales are limited to what new cars were purchased in the past. Electric vehicles in used car sales have grown by 63% per year since early 2020. That growth follows the growth in new car sales in previous years.

Gasoline-powered cars are dropping a little more than electric vehicles are rising because some people in the Edmonds-Lynnwood-Mountlake Terrace area are reducing how many cars they register. That’s really the important thing. We don’t need electric vehicles. What we need is to stop burning gasoline. Public transportation and walking also reduce gasoline burning.

Progress on electric vehicles is likely to slow down for a few years. We need to resist that. It’s a hassle, but we can do it as long as we are clear in our own minds about what needs to be done.

— By Nick Maxwell

Nick Maxwell is a certified climate action planner at Climate Protection NW, teaches about climate protection at the Creative Retirement Institute and serves on the Edmonds Planning Board.

  1. Sounds like government is broke so subsidies are likely to go away, tired of paying taxes so rich people can get a cost break while the only thing I get is higher taxes. No worries though I am sure Washington state government will find a way to install more regressive taxes to make up the difference can’t have those do good rich people paying full price.

  2. Nick. Do you read the Wall Street Journal’s articles about global warming and fossil fuel elimination? Reading their articles might help you see that all electric is just not the answer to our future problems with global warming. You seem closed to any other information about the subject.

    1. Tell me more. What is their reasoning and evidence that we can’t eliminate gasoline, natural gas, and coal?
      Thanks!

  3. Would anyone be open to grabbing a coffee and chatting about this topic? I’ve been reading How the World Really Works and thinking about our reliance on fossil fuels. Given how much power in the Western Interconnection is generated from natural gas and coal—and the growing energy demands for data—I’d love to hear your thoughts on how this all fits together. IM me on Facebook if you’re interested.

  4. Cliff Mass, a professor of Atmospheric Sciences at UW has stated that fuel from fusion is about 15 years into the future, and that fusion will largely take care of climate warming. A sample of his blog:

    “Cliff Mass Weather Blog April 17, 2022 at 9:49 AM
    We have safe nuclear fission and will soon have fusion. Renewables have come down in price. Deaths from extreme weather are way down. There is great reason for optimism.”

    1. In his blog post about this last month, Professor Mass was still citing a 2022 article from the U.S. Department of Energy, https://www.energy.gov/articles/doe-national-laboratory-makes-history-achieving-fusion-ignition, at that time, for the the first time, a fusion reactor generated more power than it consumed. That is, for the first time, it was a generator of power rather than a consumer. The experimenters poured in 2.05 megajoules of energy, and got 3.15 back out, for a net gain of 1.1 megajoules. Each megajoule is the same as 0.28 kilowatt hours. Currently, you and I pay about $0.12 per kilowatt hour, so this event created the equivalent of 4 cents of electricity.

      For physicists, this is extremely exciting. This kind of thing is very helpful for the advancement of science. Scientific research like this should be funded by our federal government, but it’s going to take a while before we have the nuclear-powered car that appears at the end of Back to the Future.

      Before we can run our economies on the electricity generated with nuclear fission or fusion, we’ll need our vehicles to be electric.

      Meanwhile, these fusion reactors run at temperatures over 100 million degrees Celsius (5 billion degrees Fahrenheit). Not the sort of thing I want next door, but I have solar panels on my roof. https://www.heise.de/en/news/Nuclear-fusion-New-record-set-at-Chinese-reactor-EAST-10258284.html

      1. Nick – would you be interested in joining the discussion? Thinking Church Key later this month. IM me of Facebook if interested.

    1. So far, we have millions of EVs and about 17,000 fuel cell cars on the road in the U.S., all in California (https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a41103863/hydrogen-cars-fcev/; https://www.popsci.com/science/hydrogen-cars/), and fuel costs are about 60 cents a mile, compared to about 16 cents for gasoline and 3 cents if you charge your EV at home (https://www.mercurynews.com/2024/04/04/few-stations-and-200-to-fill-up-life-on-californias-hydrogen-highway/)

      That doesn’t mean fuel cells won’t be a wonderful solution eventually. The task is to stop burning gasoline. (Walking is good too.) It does mean that our current momentum for on-land transportation is in the direction of EV’s. For on-land transportation, our quickest solution is electric vehicles and a fully electrified railway system (https://www.solutionaryrail.org/).

      Thoughts about air travel do seriously consider hydrogen fuel cells (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c245e726r79o).

  5. I never cease to be amazed at how the human brain works to cancel out any vestige of accepting the realities of

    Nick, don’t keep telling us. Tell “the Donald” and all his one party in control for the foreseeable future pals. For at least two years all you are going to hear is, “drill, Baby, drill.”

  6. Whether through administrative action or Budget Reconciliation bills, many hundreds of billions of dollars (maybe a trillion) are expected to be reclaimed. For the time being, the days of reckless spending are coming to end. One thing for sure, we’ll keep that Canadian oil flowing south. No need to have all Canada be our 51st state, but having just Alberta doesn’t sound like such a bad idea.

    1. Following up on my comment, does anyone realistically believe that Canada, (Alberta, has vast oil and natural gas resources, larger than the whole United States combined) will just stop them and turn the country into one powered by windmills and solar? In Alberta they’re in the process of building one of the biggest data centers in the world which will be powered by natural gas electrification, what is a silly and naive proposition is the fairytale belief that it will simply disappear anytime in the foreseeable future.

  7. I read a article just the other day about HVAC units becoming a target for thieves so all you rich people that have upgraded might want to think about building a secure enclosure to protect it cause I doubt you will be getting a rebate on your replacement.

      1. If you can afford a expensive car or you can afford to redo your heating and appliances with more expensive alternatives I would call that rich. Now it is possible some people are doing what they can’t afford there is another word for them. As a example if you needed a new car and bought the cheapest EV on the market I say fine but if you buy the new cyber truck you must be rich or stupid.

  8. We will never stop drilling unless y’all want to go back to making everything out of wood and metal and animal hides. Also, the only realistic way to provide enough electricity going forward is to start building Nuke power plants now. It is already too late but better than never. Wind and solar are already showing up as the Rube Goldberg farces they are.

    1. The eventual carbon dioxide and micro-plastic releases of multi-use plastic (chairs, hospital equipment, the outsides of tools, etc.) are a problem that comes way after stopping burning gasoline, natural gas, and coal, and comes after stopping single-use plastic (soda-pop bottles, water bottles, grocery bags, and other plastic packaging). First stop gasoline, natural-gas, and coal; then stop single-use plastics; then deal with multi-use plastics.

  9. It was interesting(and sad) to follow the Palisades fire recently in California. The power was turned off and many of the EVs couldn’t get their needed electro fix. And then the abandoned EVs burned (exploded) with a more furious fire than any petro-based car. Note: petro-based cars also explode and burn. but don’t need the same house plugin fix to escape that EVs do. So, what does one do, take public EV transportation during such an inferno??

    …just sayin

  10. Actually, gasoline station pumps don’t work when you turn off the electricity either. Most people have EV’s with 200+ miles of range that they top up every night. For them, if they got enough warning, they could drive to Fresno without stopping to recharge. But I don’t recommend that. Sitting for long stretches without getting up to walk about a bit is bad for your health.
    If they did not get enough warning, they were in the same boat as folks with gasoline cars. It would have been nice if the Los Angeles area were not swinging back and forth between soaked and drought.

  11. Thanks, Nick, for your fortitude in the face of closed mindedness. It seems no matter the subject matter, there is someone who thinks their persistent gripe about how badly life has treated them is somehow amusing. I find it refreshing to read about the possibility of solutions to serious problems. The truth is that oil companies do not want to drill new wells when oil prices are low. It is not a good return on investment. As much as Trump talks, we shall see how the next four years play out. States and other countries will look for ways to move forward. In the meantime more Americans will get on board. I have an induction stove/electric oven which was competitively priced. A heat pump (for heat and cold) was an expense that saves us money each month from what we paid with our old furnace, plus we now have air conditioning in the summer. We are not wealthy Edmonds residents.
    Contrary to what has been said about Alberta, not all the people in that province are happy with what is happening to their environment as oil companies extract their very dirty crude oil. The province’s economy has suffered from boom/bust episodes as the cost of extraction relates to the cost of a barrel of oil on the world market.

    1. Thanks, Michael!

      Congratulations on the induction stove! It’s good to hear how you’ve gotten electrified!

    2. Good to hear that you are experiencing cost savings with your heat pump Michael. I am coming up on the one year anniversary of having my heat pump installed and I have been collecting data on my electricity bill along with data on the weather. I had hoped to be able to correlate the amount of kWh I consume with the weather data to normalize the billing data with fluctuations in weather but that hasn’t proved very successful. Despite that, it is abundantly clear that I am recouping significant savings on my electric bill and reducing my demand on the system.

      And as you point out, I have air conditioning too! We didn’t use the AC very much last summer but there were a few days where we were very glad to have it.

    3. You say not all are happy in Alberta, well they should band together and vote in the NDP or liberals.Good luck with that plan. Funny.

      1. Since you are aware of Alberta politics, then you know that the people there are not one issue voters, as most citizens in a democracy. As I said, there are many who are unhappy with what oil extraction has done to the environment: the pollution of the Athabasca River, the wildfires. I personally met one native Albertan who said health care in the Maritimes was better than in Alberta, which surprised me. No question that since the recession of 2008 the tar sands of Alberta have supplied a lot of jobs for Canadians from all provinces. The extraction of oil there has only been economically feasible due to high oil prices. If Trump brings down its price as he claims, it will hurt Alberta.

    4. I am talking about Washington state government more than half the people are living paycheck to paycheck they have record debts they have no money for upgrades even with subsidies yet they pay for discounts that only the haves can afford. You want to tell your local and state leaders to change the regressive tax structure that is fine with me but that isn’t what they have done. Being poor I don’t pay a lot of federal taxes but this state more than makes up for it.

  12. Folks, don’t listen to Molly. I happen to know he is filthy rich and has all his off shore 100% American not taxed cash stashed in a mattress at his cabin off the grid somewhere in the wilds of Nova Scotia. I’ve taken the liberty of sending Trump a personal note about this so he can forward it on to ICE; so we can MAGA.

    Actually Mike is a very intelligent and open minded guy who’s actually right about things in general, (once in awhile.)

    T.W. – You might want to file this under “suspected misinformation” and just for poking some fun at a good friend.

  13. The hotter it gets the more people will move off oil and gas and coal. I wish it could happen right now but as you can see from some of these comments that many have swallowed the fossil fuel propaganda. The oil companies followed the same playbook as the tobacco companies to sow doubt and yet we finally got on board with suing the tobacco companies and making changes. Yes some people still smoke and some people will hold onto gas cars and stoves but fossil fuels are on their way out despite what Trump does. In fact Trump might fuel the anti-oil resistance around the world. He’s making everyone angry.

      1. You will have to search Washington policy center I could not link the article but it did say it came from government data my guess the government’s data is skewed in favor of its initiatives. But neither here nor there the cost is high for Washington taxpayers and the results are poor at best.

        1. Mr Fairchild, the Washington Policy Institute is a right-wing think tank that has biased information. It has ties to the fossil fuel industry through the Koch and Murdock networks. And even if there were an increase in emissions during a decade when population was rising, think how much more might have occurred with no state efforts.

  14. And the Washington state government is a biased organization the majority of who have and continue to have what could be the most regressive tax system in the country. With the population increase it looks more like a wash in results but yet they continue to persecute low income people with their taxes. I don’t need to save the planet I need to eat and keep a roof over my head but yet here you are defending their actions.

    1. I am all in favor of raising the national minimum wage, creating a universal basic income, and increasing taxes on the wealthiest one percent, including capital gains, to help address the outrageous inequities in this nation. People like Trump don’t pay enough taxes yet he wants to give the rich a tax cut that they don’t need. Everything that will help you, Mr. Fairchild, will never come from the Republican side of the aisle. Trickle down economics doesn’t work despite what Republicans claim. Yet you blame the party that will do what is feasible to help low income people and not the party (Republicans) that will make sure only the top one percent gets ahead. Before Ronald Reagan, the top marginal tax rate was at 70 percent. And the top effective rate was 40 percent on average. He brought that down to 28 percent and that began the rise in inequality that we see today. Reagan also exploded the deficit by doing that tax cut just like Trump’s tax cut did. If you really want to complain about inequality talk to Trump.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.