Part 4 of a 5-part series. You can read part 1 here, part 2 here and part 3 here.
This article on the Edmonds Marsh and Estuary is the fourth in a series discussing the state of Edmonds waters. Previously I introduced readers to stormwater, then the state of Edmonds’ streams, and of Edmonds’ marine waters. The next and final article will offer solutions to improve the quality of Edmonds’ waters and habitat.
The Edmonds Marsh, located just south of Harbor Square between SR 104 and the railroad, is a 22-acre remnant of the original marsh and estuary. Once important habitat for migrating juvenile salmon and for spawning coho and chum, it covered over 100 acres. Open to Puget Sound, it stretched from Point Edwards to the ferry terminal and was used by Tulalip and Suquamish tribes for fishing, hunting and foraging
The estuary has undergone many changes. The western edge was filled for the railroad. It was split by Dayton Avenue, and the southern portion was filled for the Unocal (now Chevron) oil facility. The northern two-thirds were filled for private development in the 1970s, and by the Port of Edmonds for Harbor Square. Willow Creek was contained in a pipe by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT); it runs underneath the Unocal site and discharges into Puget Sound. Today, the other connection to the Sound is a city-owned, 1,600-foot pipe near the railroad that discharges directly into Puget Sound. Unfortunately, the pipes prevent salmon accessing the marsh and the creeks.
The shrunken, 22-acre marsh was donated to the City of Edmonds by Unocal and is now a city park. It is recognized as a significant regional bird habitat and as part of a wildlife corridor stretching along Puget Sound.
The Unocal site and Harbor Square are both contaminated. Chevron is cleaning the Unocal site under the guidance of the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). The soil under Harbor Square is subject to covenants against disturbing the underlying pollution.
In 2007, WSDOT signed a purchase agreement for the Unocal site and placed $8 million in an escrow account, planning to relocate the ferry terminal there. That plan has been abandoned. The transaction is still in escrow until DOE determines that the site is clean enough to allow development, then WSDOT will take ownership.
The current Marsh configuration comes with problems aside from the remaining contamination. Clearly, restoration of the marsh and estuary means restoring habitat for migrating Chinook salmon and giving spawning chum and coho access to the lower portions of Willow and Shellabarger creeks. Perhaps of greater interest to some, restoration offers the opportunity to eliminate flooding from the Edmonds Marsh that periodically inundates Dayton Avenue and Harbor Square.
Many changes were made to the original estuary without a clear understanding of their impact. Today, a study is underway to evaluate removing the (contaminated) fill material and restoring a functioning estuary. Funded by a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Fish and Wildlife Foundation coastal resiliency grant managed by the City of Edmonds with assistance by the citizen volunteers of Edmonds Marsh Estuary Advocates, the engineers are looking at the effect of excavating the Unocal site, restoring the estuary and providing flood protection for Dayton Avenue and Harbor Square. Subsequent phases will undertake preliminary design and technical studies to support permit applications, followed by final design, acquisition and construction.
This will all take many years, but substantial grant funding and other support is available making this a real possibility. This will be discussed in the next article in this series.
— By Bill Derry
Edmonds resident Bill Derry is the president of the Pilchuck Audubon Society and a member of the Edmonds Marsh Estuary Advocates. He previously served six years on the board of directors for People for Puget Sound.
Very good synopsis of the current Marsh and Estuary situation. Thanks for the update.
Wow, Bill. This Article makes it seem possible that we might actually be able to provide a waterway allowing the salmon to go from stream into Marsh. That would be so exciting although there are definitely several steps in between. I look forward to the next article with information about what we can do. Thank you for these well-written articles explaining the history, current situation, and options for Our Edmonds Marsh.
Bill from your comments it seems that the area that was contaminated is still contaminated and the resolution will take many more years of hard negotiations to ever make it available for anything, water fish and perhaps a park.
What development could possibly be allowed on the “in escrow” WSDOT property when all of it is in a Seismic Hazard Area?
Edmonds GIS Critical Areas Map
https://maps.edmondswa.gov/Html5Viewer/?viewer=Edmonds_SSL.HTML
Check “Critical Areas” to view the map. The red cross-hatching is Seismic Hazard, beginning at the waterfront, Port of Edmonds, covers the entire Marsh, WSDOT property, north along the waterfront and Sunset Ave. It also extends well east of Edmonds Way/SR104.
“Residential structures” or use as “places of public employment or public assembly are not allowed in Seismic Hazard areas.
https://edmonds.municipal.codes/ECDC/23.80.020
23.80.040
Allowed activities – Geologically hazardous areas.
B. Seismic Hazard Areas. The following activities are allowed within seismic hazard areas:
1. Construction of new buildings with less than 2,500 square feet of floor area or roof area, whichever is greater, and which are not residential structures or used as places of employment or public assembly;
2. Additions to existing single-story residences that are 250 square feet or less; and
3. Installation of fences. [Ord. 4314 § 105 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Mr. Derry, after reviewing the above could you venture an answer to my question? Thanks so much for this series.
I first learned of the Seismic Hazard Area referenced by Joan Bloom in relation to the Sandpiper development application: https://www.edmondswa.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=16495016&pageId=17555268
Despite that the property to be developed overlaps a Seismic Hazard area (as well as a portion of Edmonds Marsh east of SR104, a wildlife refuge, and wetlands) the application was accepted as complete without the required geotechnical study.
Many Edmonds residents are concerned that Mayor/staff are moving the Sandpiper application forward despite these critical areas. I believe Shellabarger Creek also runs through this area. Could you comment upon this?
Thank you for this informative series.
Thank you for this most informative series of articles concerning the state of Puget sound waters. It reinforces my opinion that it is hypocritical of Puget sound residents to dictate what Idaho should do with the Snake river dams. It is obvious that rampant development along the shores of Puget sound need to be stopped and reversed.
It appears that city and county councils would rather bow to developers and builders.
Mr. Slauson,
I agree that “rampant development along the shores of Puget sound needs to be stopped” however it’s not possible to reverse development. I also agree that “city and county councils would rather bow to developers and builders.”
Many concerned residents are questioning the Sandpiper Condominiums (PLN 2024-0085) accepted as complete on 12-10-24, despite that the required geotechnical study related to the seismic hazard area the property overlaps was not in the submitted documents. Our concern extends to future applications that Mayor/staff may deem complete without all required studies being submitted with the initial application.
For those who want to review the Sandpiper Condominiums (PLN 2024-0085) application materials, Carol Lindsay has provided this link for you to do so: https://www.edmondswa.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=16495016&pageId=17555268