The governor’s push for $100 million in new state funding to hire police officers has gotten complicated as this year’s Washington legislative session enters its second half.
A new bill moving through the Legislature that would rework the proposed grant plan has driven a 180-degree shift among lawmakers.
Democrats have warmed to this one. Republicans have chilled.
Gov. Bob Ferguson and others note Washington has for years been last in the nation in police staffing per capita. Ferguson pledged on the campaign trail last year to add more officers to the state’s law enforcement ranks. And he’s continued to press the issue now that he’s in office.
Ferguson has said he wants the $100 million both in the two-year budget lawmakers will pass this year, and the next one in 2027. He’s vowed to veto any budget that doesn’t include it.
But many Democrats, including those on the Legislative Black Caucus, have raised concerns about over-policing in disadvantaged communities and argue that more officers are not the best public safety solution.
In a January meeting, Black lawmakers told the governor more money to add cops should be matched with funding for social services.
Rep. Kristine Reeves, D-Federal Way, the chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, said House Bill 2015 strikes that balance, allowing the governor to stay true to his promise while offering a more nuanced approach to public safety that isn’t just more cops on the beat.
The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Debra Entenman, D-Kent, is a leading police accountability voice in the Legislature.
“A few of you may wonder why I am sponsoring this legislation,” Entenman told a House panel last month. “To me, there has to be more than just more police on the streets. And with this bill, I’m hoping to fund not only more police on the streets, but more services for those who might need assistance.”
This legislation combines the governor’s temporary infusion of state cash with a more permanent funding source: A local sales tax.
The fine print
The House measure sponsored by Entenman combines portions of several bills under consideration. At least half a dozen bills in Olympia seek to spur new revenue for local police.
This bill would allow cities and counties to implement a new 0.1% sales tax dedicated to criminal justice, without voter approval. Rough estimates show the tax would bring in over $276 million for local governments this biennium and $595 million in the next. That projection assumes the 35 counties and 21 cities that have adopted similar public safety or criminal justice sales taxes will also impose the new one.
For example, the proposal could allow King County to stave off harsh budget cuts as it faces a two-year budget deficit upward of $150 million.
To access grants from the Criminal Justice Training Commission, localities must implement the new tax by June 30, 2027.
Local police departments and sheriff’s offices would have to jump through a few more hoops to tap the $100 million in state grant funding. These hurdles include adopting model policies on use-of-force and other issues from the state attorney general’s office, completing trauma-informed training for all officers and complying with the Keep Washington Working Act that restricts local police from helping federal authorities with immigration enforcement.
In the wake of President Donald Trump’s promise of the biggest deportation campaign in U.S. history — and threats to local jurisdictions that don’t assist in reaching that goal — some Washington police officials have said they still may aid in federal immigration enforcement efforts. The Pierce County sheriff is one of them.
The bill has quickly moved through two committees and now awaits action on the House floor, where it could get further amended.
Meanwhile, the initial proposal Ferguson championed, Senate Bill 5060, sits ready for a vote from the full Senate.
That legislation would fund the $100 million grant program with similar policy requirements to qualify. While this bill would require 25% of officers to have completed a 40-hour crisis intervention training to qualify, Entenman’s bill requires 80% compliance.
Sen. Jeff Holy, R-Cheney, who proposed this bill, said it’s been heartening to have a governor focused on police staffing. He said he remains flexible on how the legislation evolves.
“Everyone is going to have ideas of how it should be,” Holy said, adding “I don’t care what form it takes.”
Holy’s bill, which has had bipartisan support, doesn’t propose the new sales tax. The money in his measure could be used for police officers, county corrections officers, peer counselors and behavioral health co-responders.
Under House Bill 2015, the grant money can be used for more than just hiring. Crisis intervention training and other public safety efforts, like emergency management planning and community assistance programs, are among the other spending options. But the bill is null and void if lawmakers don’t include the $100 million in state funding in the budget.
A budget shortfall the governor has pegged at $15 billion over the next four years is squeezing the budget and has officials scrambling for cuts. But, so far, legislative leaders have not indicated they will rebuff Ferguson on police funding.
House Speaker Laurie Jinkins, D-Tacoma, suggested Entenman’s bill will require more fine-tuning but will likely reach the floor for a vote by Wednesday, the deadline for legislation to pass out of its chamber of origin.
“I think that there’s a lot of good work going on around that bill to try and understand and represent what the governor wants, but also what members of the caucus are thinking about, too,” Jinkins said.
The debate
Both bills have the governor’s support.
In a statement Friday, Ferguson said “legislators are working hard, and I am optimistic about our progress,” but didn’t indicate a favored proposal.
Groups representing police, cities and counties like the House bill.
“This is really a compilation, I think, of the best parts of a lot of proposals that have been out here in this space,” said Brad Banks, a policy consultant for the Washington State Association of Counties.
But while Republicans championed Holy’s bill, they staunchly oppose Entenman’s. Those from smaller cities say the sales tax will do little to raise money for public safety.
“I think it spreads the peanut butter a little too thin when it comes to actually getting more boots on the ground,” said state Rep. Chris Corry, R-Yakima.
Senate Republican Leader John Braun, of Centralia, acknowledged Holy’s bill might not make it to the governor’s desk.
“I can’t say for sure it’ll go all the way this year,” he told reporters last week. “We’re going to keep pulling and keep pushing to get our state back on a better track when it comes to law enforcement by recognizing the challenges we have. And this is not a cure-all. This is a step in the right direction, but it’s a relatively small step.”
Many Democrats still don’t think House Bill 2015 is perfect. Some find the idea of funding more police hard to stomach.
The debate will likely linger for the rest of the session, scheduled to end April 27.
Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence.
Democrats went from BLM and Defunding to Begging police to come back with hiring bonuses! Amazing how when the polling changes the politics change. Nothing like super high crime to change some hearts and minds.
I just wonder what kind of police officers he plans to hire. Based on his policies and ideologies he defends, they would be more like brown shirts.
The Governor does not hire local police. Cities and Counties hire after a lengthy vetting process. Mr. Rossi’s “brown shirt” snipe is beneath contempt. If we want to reduce crime we need more police officers on the streets.
From an individual that defended criminals and questionable policies while AG, it’s not far fetched to expect he will continue his policies in the new seat. He already tried to cut the AG office’s budget. Didn’t he also propose moving that office directly under his office?
And, as the icing on the cake, Olympia has been taking over several roles that used to be decided and managed by the cities, such as population densities, construction codes, etc. in the latest legislation. Now even wants to dictate city parking.
So, as a BLM and other organizations that have been demonstrating behavior similar to the brown shirts (that he supports), that extra one would not surprise me a little bit. After all the party that created them demonstrated similar authoritarian behavior. So, no, it’s not far fetched.
As per above, can someone please explain to me what “over policing” is? Is “under policing” therefore better? How do you know one from the other?
And “disadvantaged communities”? Aren’t these the very communities that suffer the most criminality going on in their neighborhoods? It seems to me that one of their main “disadvantages” is this lawlessness going on unchecked all around them.
And another nonsensical statement: that “more police are not the best public safety solution”? So fewer police are therefore the better safety solution?
Who thinks this way? Are they just stupid or are they merely manipulating reality to benefit them politically? These are the very communities that cry for more police, not less.
When you dial 911 you expect a response in a few minutes do you not? So, how about we reduce the number of officers on duty to “make public safety better” and the response runs out to an hour?
That will make these communities safer for sure!
Good questions, Mark. Some answers to them are available by opening the active cells in the WA St Standard article. Yes, communities with high crime rates are places where residents seek a visible police presence, with a caveat: they want officers who understand the community. If there are streets with adult care homes, halfway houses, and cannabis stores, bars and night clubs, officers with training in de-escalation, and access to help from mental health professionals would be ideal. This is not often the case. Over policing may refer to officers unnecessarily initiating injury or even death, as in a traffic stop for expired tabs, a no-knock warrant, or an arrest for alleged passing counterfeit 20’s. A disadvantaged community might refer to one with a high number of the establishments that I mention here. There are disadvantaged communities with other problems such as abandoned buildings, vacant lots, high traffic volume or lots of industry. Residents in communities with the adverse issues that these places have deserve to be safe. It takes well-trained officers, supported by residents and social service experts, to police these areas.
There is no accounting for the misrepresentations of reality these days. Yes, there were those so angered by the sight of a police officer with his knee on the neck of a pleading citizen for nearly 9 minutes, they advocated for defunding the police. They were a fringe of the larger call for increasing funding for emergency services to assist police when interventions involving mental illness and other non/criminal situations arose. Contrary to all the exaggerations by President Trump, violent and property crime decreased during the Biden presidency and have “plunged since the 1990’s.” This is according to Pewresearch.org. That organization used FBI and BJS (Bureau of Justice Statistics). Extremists in both political parties are separated by the centrist majority who want to see a safer society.
The political right is exemplified by Trump, who once called for the swift conviction of five young men accused of rape, taking out a $85,000 advertisement in a New York paper calling for a speedy trial. Only to learn later that the five were innocent. He never apologized or retracted his statements. This happens repeatedly in other criminal cases, especially for people who cannot afford a lawyer. Only most often they are wrongfully convicted and spend years in jail.
The brown shirts beat up, tortured and killed Jewish people, vandalized their work places and homes and fed the big lie that the Jewish Race was destroying the master race of people of Nordic dissent. There are problems with both the Left and Right extremes in our country right now but Mr. Rossi’s comparison of ‘brown shirts” is a huge overreach exaggeration and defeats, to a great extent, his own points that he is trying to make; some of which are quite valid.