Some bills that address housing and homelessness are still alive in the Washington State Legislature, but a deadline looms for them to stay alive in the current session.
March 12 is the last day for lawmakers to consider bills in the house of origin. This means bills must leave the chamber that lawmakers introduced them in by the end of the day or they’re considered dead for the year.
This year’s legislative session ends April 27. Other important dates can be found at leg.wa.gov/bills-meetings-and-session/session/.
Here’s a snapshot of seven bills – among many – that are still standing as of March 7.
Siting STEP housing
House Bill 1195 covers the siting of permanent supportive housing, transitional housing, indoor emergency housing and indoor emergency shelters – also known as STEP housing.
Under HB 1195, it would prevent Comprehensive Plans or development regulations from refusing or preventing STEP housing permit applications in any residential or commercial zones in most urban growth areas.
HB 1195 would require the state Department of Commerce to assist with a dispute resolution process between a city or county and a STEP housing project applicant or developer.
Commerce would be allowed to issue a noncompliance finding if dispute resolution was unsuccessful, if the city or county rejected a project permit or development agreement, or if the city or county enacted a zoning ordinance or development regulation preventing STEP housing.
According to a bill report, supporters say STEP housing plays an important role to help address homelessness. Those testifying as “Other” (rather than registering as in support or opposed) say the penalties mentioned in the bill, such as withholding sales tax from a city or county, are concerning.
Rep. Strom Peterson, a 21st District Democrat from Edmonds, sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include two 32nd District Democrats from Shoreline: Reps. Cindy Ryu and Lauren Davis.
Rent stabilization
HB 1217 would place a 7% cap on annual rent and fee increases. It gives tenants different types of protections when it comes to lease terminations, move-in fees, security deposits and late fees.
HB 1217 would require Commerce to create a virtual landlord resource center and to contract with a third party that can do a social vulnerability assessment on the impacts rent stabilization may have.
Those supporting HB 1217 say it would prevent “excessive rent increases” and let landlords raise the rent each year to invest in their property and make a profit, according to a bill report.
Those opposing HB 1217 say it wouldn’t increase housing supply, which would result in the state becoming “less competitive” than neighboring states when it comes to housing investment, according to the bill report.
Sen. Emily Alvarado (D-West Seattle) sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include Peterson, 21st District Rep. Lillian Ortiz-Self (D-Mukilteo) and Davis.
Parking requirements
Senate Bill 5184 would prohibit a city and county from requiring more than half of a parking space per residential dwelling unit and more than one parking space per 1,000 square feet of commercial space.
SB 5184 would also prohibit a city and county from requiring any minimum parking requirements for affordable housing, senior housing and housing for people with disabilities, among other types of housing.
According to a bill report, supporters say it would increase housing supply by updating “outdated and archaic” parking requirements. Opponents say parking requirements should be decided by local governments that understand their community’s needs.
Sen. Jessica Bateman (D-Olympia) sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include 21st District Sen. Marko Liias (D-Edmonds) and 32nd District Sen. Jesse Salomon (D-Shoreline).
Transit-oriented housing
HB 1491 would require cities to allow new residential and mixed-use development around certain public transit stations. It would require Commerce to manage a program to give cities tools they need to implement transit-oriented development requirements.
Supporters of HB 1491 say it helps make it possible for developers to build new housing around frequently used transit areas, according to a bill report. It would make communities more affordable and help cut pollution.
Opponents say the bill has requirements that may discourage developers from building, and that mandatory affordability requirements can decrease the chances of getting more housing.
Rep. Julia Reed (D-Seattle) sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include Ryu, Davis and Peterson.
Regulation of public property
HB 1380 would require local laws that regulate sitting, lying, sleeping or keeping warm and dry outdoors on public property to be objectively reasonable to time, place and manner.
HB 1380 also allows a person to bring a lawsuit against a city or town for injunctive or declaratory relief to challenge a law that regulates sitting, lying, sleeping or keeping warm and dry outdoors on public property.
The bill, in part, is in response to the 2024 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that permits local governments to enforce anti-camping and anti-sleeping ordinances, and that those ordinances are not “cruel and unusual punishments” as per the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
According to a bill report, supporters say it protects the rights of people experiencing homelessness. Opponents say the bill will result in “unnecessary litigation,” which can take away from resources that could go toward reducing homelessness.
Rep. Mia Gregerson (D-SeaTac) sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include Peterson.
Mobile dwellings
HB 1443 would permit a city or county to allow up to two mobile dwellings per residential lot if certain requirements are met. A mobile dwelling is defined as a “tiny house on wheels,” according to a bill report.
Those supporting HB 1443 say mobile dwellings create immediate and affordable housing. It can give people experiencing homelessness a dignified housing option, according to the bill report.
Those who testified as “Other” for HB 1443 say mobile dwellings raise concerns about water and sewer issues, according to the bill report. There is also a chance they may not meet Department of Health guidelines.
Gregerson sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include Peterson.
Lot splitting
Under HB 1096, cities that are required to comply with middle housing requirements must include a process for those interested in dividing a property into smaller lots. The lots would be subject to all existing and local laws, including the state building code.
According to a bill report, supporters say it would increase the housing supply. Opponents say this bill may pose a risk to areas with high population density and limited water supply.
Rep. Andrew Barkis (R-Olympia) sponsored the bill. Other legislators co-sponsoring it include Ryu.
Angelica Relente is a Murrow News Fellow covering housing and related issues in South Snohomish County for the My Neighborhood News Network. Contact her at angelica@myedmondsnews.com.
This is government requiring bigger government in a never ending circle. Just how much more do we need to be governed? The city thinks we need to be governed at more than double the current price. Honest question.
HB 1403 -Simplifying condominium construction statutes, is long overdue.
https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2025-26/Pdf/Bill%20Reports/House/1403%20HBR%20CRJ%2025.pdf?q=20250309203858
“Senate Bill 5184 would prohibit a city and county from requiring more than half of a parking space per residential dwelling…” Prohibited from requiring more than HALF a parking space? Ridiculous and harmful to the neighborhood!
Awesome this is where Democrats make places like Edmonds like Tukwila. How charming.
Yes, the Progressive Democrats’ false god includes many negative outcomes.
It’s their religion.
“False god”? Religion? Virtually all my devout Christian friends are regular church-goers and quite liberal.
Maybe drop the insulting and offensive “god” and “religion” (Mr Gardner) stuff and discuss policy, maybe even offer some better ideas?
Nathaniel I kind of see his point as people religion in today’s world isn’t what it used to be and from my observation many look to government to solve their problems. I don’t know if they pray but certainly they are well invested in this solution. If so invested why would it be wrong to call it religion isn’t government a higher power? Food for thought.
Yes, and that’s certainly a use that some people apply. But to religious people, I believe, a faith in God is something that transcends government, parties, etc. References to gods and religion are too easy to throw around, and potentially offensive to people of faith, especially when they are being told their religion/god is something as mundane and corrupt as a given political party that the writer dislikes, wouldn’t you agree?
I wish people to have hope and faith without it we are ruined. I am more like karma and star wars and aliens than government and religion. But to each their own, certainly we have a world where there are no norms anymore faith in anything is questionable.
Do you ever have a legitimate comment? It’s usually just showing displeasure with others comments. If you want some policy comments, make some policy comments. If you want ideas? Post some. Policing others isn’t an open forum.
Back to SB 5184, its authors’ wish for state control of parking spaces usurps local control. This micromanagement by the state puts itself in a hierarchy of higher power. Their lack of trust in local powers to determine parking spaces, in turn, can lead to a lack of trust toward that higher power of the state (false god). Nathaniel, you asked for better ideas. Isn’t local control a better idea?
Update: SB 5284 passed the Senate, so if you want local control of parking spaces, call the legislative hotline at 800.562.6000 to state your opposition to this bill that’s now in the House. Your opinion can be sent to each of your legislators and the governor. Edmonds’ aggressive legislators are inflicting more and more loss of local control with each session.
The state online form to express approval or opposition to this bill is here:
https://app.leg.wa.gov/pbc/bill/5184
State legislators have a town hall Saturday at Mariner High School
https://myedmondsnews.com/2025/03/21st-district-legislators-to-hold-community-town-hall-march-15/
The correct bill number re state control of local parking is 5184. Thank you, David.