Eck launches reelection campaign, pledging values-based approach to city issues

Chris Eck speaks to supporters at Brigid’s Bottleshop Wednesday. (Photos by Larry Vogel)

An estimated 60 people gathered on Wednesday afternoon at Brigid’s Bottleshop to support Edmonds City Councilmember Chris Eck as she kicked off her campaign for re-election.

“Getting to know Chris over the years has been a pleasure,” said Maria Montalvo as she called the event to order.  “She’s quite an amazing woman, a lot of integrity and just somebody I think we’re lucky to have in Edmonds. She’s a solid citizen and we’re lucky to have her on our council. Being on council is a hard job; it’s a job someone takes not for glory but because they truly care about our community.

“We may think about things at the national level a lot, but it’s really the local level that impacts us every single day,” Montalvo concluded.  “We need people with Chris’s leadership, kindness, goodness and commitment to lead us.”

Councilmember Susan Paine stressed how Chris Eck “hit the ground running” from the minute she joined council.

Eck’s colleague on city council, Susan Paine, spoke next.

“I’ve been so pleased to be working with Chris during her first term on council,” Paine began.  “When Chris first joined council she needed no transition period – she came in and hit the ground running.”

Next up was Edmonds environmentalist Marjie Fields who described Eck as someone who draws people to her with her warmth and kindness. She particularly noted Eck’s commitment to citizen input and advocacy for environmental protection, which earned her endorsements from organizations including the Sierra Club.

Marjie Fields spoke about Chris Eck’s commitment to protecting the environment.

“Chris has the background and experience that our city needs,” Fields said. “It enables her to guide population and revenue growth while protecting the family character of Edmonds and preserving our parks, open spaces and tree canopy that are so important to our health and well-being.”

Eck then took the podium, beginning with reflecting on how her decision to run for council was driven by her desire to serve her community and make a genuine contribution. She stressed the challenges of balancing growth and environmental protection, and the importance of hearing from all community members. Her plans for the coming year focus on addressing the city’s budget crisis, rebuilding human services staff and maintaining community support.

“Where I come from is service,” said Eck, who works as vice president of programs for Volunteers of America Western Washington.  “On council, I’m always thinking about what people across our city think about the issues and decisions we grapple with, especially those voices that are not getting amplified. I think about how we will achieve that delicate balance of managing growth in our community – not just that it’s a requirement by the state but because it’s the right thing — and at the same time ensuring that we protect our environment.

Chris Eck said that addressing the city’s budget crisis is her top concern.

“I think it’s a false choice to say that you can’t do both [growth and the environment], and I am working really hard and will continue to push and fight to find that balance,” she continued. “This work is very important to me from a values standpoint – I’m very values-based – and I will fight against those who push back against growth and environmental protection or deny that we have a lot more work to do on the Climate Action Plan.”

She went on to identify the budget crisis as among her biggest priorities in the coming year.

“We absolutely must find ways to raise revenue, and it’s not going to just be strictly through taxes,” she said, noting that the city council is considering a list of creative choices for increasing revenue.

She also pledged to work to restore certain budget cuts made to critical areas of the city.

“I want to build back some of the human services staff that we’ve had to cut,” she said. “I want to bring back some of the police that we’ve had to lay off, and some of the planning work that we really need. I want to have money to make sure that, once again, we can hire people for our parks to keep them maintained at the level we all want. I can’t make false promises that those things can be done by just me or be done overnight, but this work is behind right now and we need to get started on it.

“I’m going to keep fighting for these values,” she said. “But even in my most intense moments, I treat everyone with respect, no matter who you are, where you come from, who you love and what you choose to do with your time. And I’m going to continue to bring that to council. That’s who I am and how I’m going to show up.”

Nikki Glaros praised Eck for her listening skills.

The event concluded with remarks and a call for campaign donations from Nikki Glaros.

“I really appreciate Chris’s, multi-faceted talents,” she said.  “She has an amazing business mind, and a wonderful background, but she’s also empathetic and an amazing listener. She listens to everybody, she’s respectful of everybody, and really represents all of Edmonds.”

Learn more at www.electchriseck.com or follow her campaign on Facebook at @ChrisEckforCityCouncil.

  1. I appreciate how Chris Eck bought a ticket and showed up to the Meadowdale High School Sports Booster Club auction that helped raise over $70,000 to high school athletics. Will Chen and his wife came as well. If you’ll excuse the sports pun, that was really going the extra mile to help interact with constituents and help youth in the community.

    1. And her vote for RFA puts Edmonds home ownership for those kids further out of reach. Not to mention increased rents, food prices.

  2. Chris Eck has proven herself to be a great addition to Edmonds City Council and I am thrilled to support her re-election. Her ability to listen and bring constituents concerns to council is really heartening and necessary. She’s got an eye on – and an heart for – all of Edmonds.

    1. I hope someone decent runs against her. She will not have my vote. I feel she is very misinformed about numerous things, in addition to her non-neutrality. She has her own agenda. Definitely not what we need on our city council.

  3. Nothing against Ms. Eck as I believe she’s a nice person with good intentions. But, we need competent people to help fix our city problems. We need people who can negotiate well and will not buckle under the pressure of all the difficulties we are facing. We need wholesale change starting from the mayor and many of the council members who unfortunately don’t have what it takes to strongly represent their constituents. They are simply failing to come up with innovative ways to help us through our situation. Their basic solutions: cut things, sell things, panic giving away of our assets, etc. They absolutely could have negotiated a better deal with the RFA (remember first giving away the three fire departments until resident uproar?) with many more benefits for Edmonds residents but simply were just glad to hand us off quickly so they could gain a chunk of our property taxes without us voting for it – I’m talking about keeping the portion of what we already pay for Fire/EMS! It is time. The current representatives had their many chances and have proven the tasks are beyond their competencies – so much so that they resorted to shady and questionable (illegal?) practices. We deserve better.

  4. Edmonds is better for Chris Eck’s leadership on Council and we are lucky she is running for reelection. Her commitment to our city is multifaceted. In spite of being a busy working mom and councilmember, she makes time to participate in volunteer events around town as well. I was especially impressed to see her cheerfully shoveling and spreading woodchips along the north Marsh buffer on a recent Saturday morning. She works hard for us!

  5. Kathleen:

    You have stated: “Edmonds is better for Chris Eck’s leadership on Council”. Please give us some specifics as to how Eck being a councilmeber has made Edmonds a better place.

  6. Citizens of Edmonds were recently provided with an example of Chris Eck’s work as an Edmond City Councilmember.

    As Joe Scordino pointed out on March 30, 2025:

    “Last year, the City Council approved a total rewrite of the Comprehensive Plan that set very specific (and binding) goals and policies for increasing housing density and changed the City’s land use maps to cram more buildings and parking areas throughout the City – – without regard to what effects that would have on our natural environment, recovering our salmon runs, or our citizens who enjoy the fact (or used to???) that Edmonds is a unique waterfront community that strives to have year-round good quality streams, wetlands, and greenery (i.e., trees) throughout our city.”

    All Edmond City Councilmembers were aware that the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update fell short. All knew of the need to amend it in 2025 to address the problems with the 2024 adoption.

    When given an opportunity to recommend amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for 2025, Councilmember Eck made a total of one recommendation. That recommendation was not consistent with citizen input about the North Bowl “hub”.

    Weeks later, she requested her recommendation be withdrawn during the April 21, 2025 Council Meeting.

    She also voted for Councilmember Jenna Nand’s improper motion to “table” many other recommended amendments, many of which related to environmental considerations.

  7. Love to know where Eck stands on the following:

    1. What is Eck doing to address Edmonds residents number 1 priority “housing affordability” (Mayor’s 24′ survey)? I care about my neighbors, and prefer they stay in Edmonds. Many of them are sharing concerns of affordability.

    – Voting to double our City & Fire property tax bill via RFA annexation, doesn’t seem aligned with residents priority.

    https://www.edmondswa.gov/government/city_budget/community_survey (see Desktop version, more clear).

    2. Your campaign website touts an endorsement by Strom Peterson. Strom Peterson, sponsored the bills forcing density on Edmonds & HB1178 reducing sentencing for crimes committed with a firearm, using kids to commit gang-related crimes & crimes of sexual motivation.

    https://komonews.com/news/local/washington-state-lawmakers-may-ease-penalty-for-using-kids-to-commit-gang-related-crimes-olympia-seattle-tacoma-wash-inslee-house-bill-1178-criminals-gangs

    Chris Eck, are you aligned with Strom Peterson’s vision for Edmonds & the State of WA?

  8. This Council hasn’t been too strong on transparency and leadership and the money being burnt using consultants and attorneys is outrageous. There are no guardrails or communication or active vetting using accurate and complete packets, correct processes and procedures. By now Council should understand laws, Robert’s Rules and codes. Where are the executives sessions to discuss real estate transaction? I haven’t seen the historical knowledge needed for seeing unintended consequences from bad decisions and unfortunately I have a good memory and saw how Lynnwood citizens treated Eck’s political bid.

    So I’m hopeful for someone to come forward who really understands the true character of this town and how codes need to change to protect the environment, human safety, or our clear drinking water.

    This City needs strong leaders that start demanding accountability and transparency and actually listens to citizens who talk of unintended consequences as land use decisions will ruin this environmentally sensitive town. It’s a very hard job and I understand the commitment and yes I am appreciative of CM Eck for her service; but my opinion now after the RFA spectacle of fear and the lack of sanctions on individuals acting outside of their authority, is that citizens deserve better and I hope multiple candidates come forth to challenge the incumbents.

  9. Chris Eck is a highly partisan candidate in a non-partisan position. Her voting record reflects the playbook of Rep Strom Peterson in up-zoning Edmonds. CM Eck took issue with my December 2024 RV: https://myedmondsnews.com/2024/12/reader-view-the-myth-of-affordable-housing/ and reached out to me. I appreciate that she spent almost her entire lunch hour hearing my point of view. However, her record continued to reflect her support for even MORE market rate housing, since her ONE amendment to the final 2024 Comp Plan stated: “I believe the decisions the Council made previously unnecessarily limit the growth for the North Hub.”

    There is no doubt that CM Eck is a kind person and means well. However, she is woefully ignorant of Edmonds’ Mayors/staff history of failure to protect our environmental assets. If she continues to vote in lock step with the Democratic Party, she will contribute to endangering the property, and potentially the safety, of her constituents. See Arlene Williams excellent RV: https://myedmondsnews.com/2025/04/reader-view-opinion-edmonds-development-code-must-protect-steep-slopes-in-westgate-neighborhood/

    As Diane Buckshnis, I hope that someone runs against CM Eck to press her to address why she supported excessive up-zoning in Edmonds 2024 Comp Plan and failed to support protection of our environmental assets.

  10. One of the best things that can happen is to have 3 people running for each council and port commission seat that will be in the General Election in Nov. The Nov election will be one of the most important elections in recent times. We will also have the second (Joining the SCFRFA was the first) levy lid lift on the ballot. That levy will not fix the rest of our financial problems. That will happen with other levys and potential bond elections in the very near future.

    By having 3 or more candidates for each position, it will allow us all to participate in a primary election. We need to recruit added candidates for each of the seats so we can have a robust community discussion of the kind of city we want to have and how do we provide stable funding for it.

    Can someone knowable with the whole process give us the road map of how to enter the race? What does it cost to enter the race and what is involved?

    1. Mr. Haug – Well said and I think that you are right on about this. The only thing I would change is to have 3 OR MORE people running for each council seat. This would put significant pressure on the electorate via a primary and general election process, not to mention pressure on sitting council members. This would also likely compel candidates who run to focus on honing and promoting their super-powers instead of complaining about scrutiny, perceived unfairness and the roughness of running for office. Edmonds deserves the best, and sometimes I think the best are not on the ballot.

      1. Dr. Waldron, yes 3 candidates will launch lots of “fun” things. Primaries allow great community discussion on our issues that folks want to actually talk about rather than just sound bites and generalizations. We have many old buildings to maintain and upgrade. Our streets, ADA ramps and sidewalks are not taking care of in a sustainable way. Yost pool is reaching end of life. Loans to be repaid and reserves rebuilt. It would be great to hear candidates discuss how should we do some for the items listed!

        Standard lines are “I’ll work on that”. What does that mean? We have serious problems, and we need candidates who will discuss “Here is how I will SOLVE that problem.” Waiting for November and the voters’ pamphlets, mailers, and endorsements will not give the voters much of anything to use to elect great candidates.

        All of our elected folks in the past and current are nice, dedicated people. But what are their respective solutions for our real problems?

        It is time to put as you say, “significant pressure on the electorate via a primary and general election process, not to mention pressure on sitting council members.”

        Folks wrote 6000 letters in a couple of weeks about parks. Let’s get 6000 revenue and cut ideas on the table now! Vibrancy requires Sustainable action plans, not just sound bites.

    2. Ideally, we will find candidates in Edmonds who genuinely commit to enhancing our quality of life and respecting the local environmental values we cherish. It’s important that once elected, they follow through on their promises and avoid turning our local landscape into a free-for-all construction zone that jeopardizes our community’s well-being.

      1. Agree with the genuine commitments part, seems obvious. Also agree that we really do need to figure out the balance between allowing a variety and pace of development that helps us stay out of the poor-house, and prevent development that we will regret later.

  11. Hi Teresa Wippel. Could you repost or tell citizens of Edmonds how to sign up for a run for City Council? I think it starts in a couple weeks but it’s a short filing period. Thank you.

      1. Thank you, Teresa and MEN, I saw the posted instructions today. Much appreciated. A very thorough job you did too.

  12. Chris Eck, Jenna Nand, Will Chen, and Susan Paine have pretty direct and distinct affinity with the Democratic majority party in the state that is pushing for maximum development of Edmonds and state municipalities in general. One of the main architects of the state take over of local zoning is Strom Peterson who is also an Edmonds citizen. Mayor Mike Rosen, on the advice of our city attorney, has shown no desire to fight back against this draconian zoning take over by the state, nor a propensity to enforce our Critical Area ordinances to get development only where it should be and also he seems quite aligned with the majority party special interests. If we keep electing and re-electing these people or people with similar demonstrated loyalties, nothing is going to change here. We’ve had enough and are in the process of figuring out a way to live elsewhere. I intended to live out the rest of my life in Edmonds but have changed my mind.

    1. Clinton, we’re unfortunately planning how and when to leave as well. But then I believe that’s the point. Get the long time residents out. We, too, wanted to stay/planned to stay in our beloved town, but with all the destructive and environmentally disastrous plans being shoved down our throats we just can’t fathom watching the death of so much of what we have held dear here. If/when we go, our little bungalow will surely be torn down and replaced with a mc-mansion, or two. It all makes me incredibly sad.

      1. My current plan is to live close enough to Edmonds to stay active in my Environmental Protection interest group (EEC), assuming they will still have me in some capacity, and I will keep financially and philosophically supporting MEN. I will keep hanging out with my Pals at the Boathouse on Friday afternoons. In other words, I will keep supporting all about Edmonds that I think is good but quit having to help finance so much of what is bad and the city spending my tax money to fight against me and my friends all the time. Annon, you seem like a really nice person and will probably be missed. In my case it’s probably a case of, “Thank God and Greyhound he’s gone,” on the part of most people. I’ve never worried much about being popular and I’ve never lacked a number of really good friends, so I must be doing something right.

        1. I think you underestimate your value to this community, Clinton. While we don’t always agree, I appreciate your perspectives and opinions as I believe you base them on research, common sense, and compassion. Things to be admired, in my book.

    2. Clinton:
      You are absolutely right that all of the council members you’ve listed who are disregarding the fact that they’ve been elected to non-partisan positions need to be replaced ASAP – that means Eck and Chen in this year’s election. They are not serving the electors, they are serving their party.

    3. Most unfortunately, the town of Edmonds is facing significant challenges due to its continuous choice of the same partisan type leaders while hoping for different outcomes.

  13. Ron, you and I have some pretty wide apart political views and could still have some lively discussions in some areas I’m sure, but we certainly agree 100% about political party politics being brought down to the city level as something that is really bad news for everyone. I’d feel the same way if these people were so oriented to the current Republican views on how everything should be run. That said, a city should be all about basic common needs of it’s citizens – Public Safety, Waste Management, Water/Sewer and Parks and infrastructure. These aren’t Democrat or Republican things (or at least they shouldn’t be), they are human needs things. I knew our city was in big financial trouble when I saw all the dirt and suspicious plumbing going in at the civic park rebuild and that we were in big political trouble when the CC spent a whole evening expounding on the abortion issue that they could do nothing about or should have no part in discussing in terms of city business needing to get done. So now it’s time for me to ride off into the sunset, so to speak.

  14. Yes! Chris Eck, Jenna Nand, Will Chen, and Susan Paine have shown their unwillingness pr inability to work for the citizens of Edmonds and get the city on track to a balanced budget. We need to replace them with honest and transparent leaders who take fiscal responsibility seriously. We have state and national constitutions that place limits on our government and all our leaders would do well to study these excellent and lasting documents.
    I will not vote for a repeat of the fiascos we have endured in Edmonds of late.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.