
Building on the groundswell of opposition to a possible sale of city property to help address the City of Edmonds’ $21 million budget deficit, a group of residents has launched Keep Edmonds Vibrant.
Group leaders hosted a initial meeting Wednesday night at the Edmonds Library, the first of several planned so that community members can contribute their ideas for addressing the city’s budget crunch. About 30 people attended Wednesday’s event, which included an overview of the group’s “very, very preliminary concept of a citywide coaltion of various stakeholders…all committed to advocating for the continued thriving of this city,” co-organizer Adel Sefrioui said.
The seed for Keep Edmonds Vibrant was planted a few weeks ago, Sefrioui said, “when we heard that the city was entertaining the idea of possibly selling some of its assets as a way to help fix or address its budget crisis. And we looked at each other and said, ‘Whoa, this is the exact opposite of what we think. We think we should be finding new sources of revenue so that we can address structural problems in our budget for the long term. This approach, we thought, was short-term patch — that once the money goes away, well then we’re left with nothing, and you still have a structural mess on our hands.”
Among the properties listed during a recent city council meeting as being considered for future sale were Hummingbird Hill Park, the Frances Anderson Center, the Wade James Theater and the Meadowdale Clubhouse. Organizers created an online petition, “and within 72 hours, it kind of went viral, and we had 7,000 emails sent to councilmembers and the mayor,” Sefrioui said.
A large group of residents crowded into the council chambers April 1 to protest the idea. Then the city council, during its April 15 work session, announced it would be considering a proposal at its April 21 meeting to drop consideration of selling those properties as part of its 2025 Comprehensive Plan update process.
“But our position remains that these assets will always be on the chopping block, always, unless we address the structural issues in our budget, which requires sustained engagement and requires difficult conversations,” Sefrioui told the group Wednesday night. “So our goals as an organization in the immediate term are to identify and pursue specific policy changes that will sustain revenue, and then to identify and advocate for a specific levy amount.”
Sefrioui, who was on the leadership team for the 2024 “ESD Yes for Kids” school levy campaign, was joined Wednesday night by two other Keep Edmonds Vibrant founders — Elise Hill and Mackey Guenther. The group’s fourth founder, Erik Houser, was unable to attend.
The first step during Wednesday’s meeting was for Sefrioui to outline the budget shortfall facing the city that has prompted elected officials to look at ways to raise revenue, and the recommendations of a Blue Ribbon Panel formed by Mayor Mike Rosen to address strategies to address the city’s financial crisis.
While city leaders have implemented some budget cuts already, including staff reductions and a hiring freeze on employees, and are also looking at other options such as deferred maintenance, “they’re not long-term solutions,” Sefrioui said. He shared a slide indicating that Edmonds has 100 fewer employees than comparable-sized cities such as Lynnwood and Puayllup.
“So what we’re saying is, do we want to be at bottom of the barrel in terms of the bare-bones operation, or do we want to continue to thrive and be a place that attracts new families?” he asked. “When we say we need to continue cutting further, where are you going to cut from? We’re already at the bottom of the barrel.”
He also noted that the city is facing a backlog of deferred maintenance, with city-owned buildings in fair-poor or poor-critical condition, according to a recent study. (See graphic below.) “So there’s the idea that we should keep kicking that can down the road until something falls on someone’s head. We don’t think that’s an option that’s appropriate,” he added.
Sefrioui agreed it’s important for the city to cut inefficient spending. “But we also need to generate more revenue,” he said.
The idea behind the initial Wednesday gathering, and for future Keep Edmonds Vibrant meetings (dates and locations are still to be determined) is this, he said: “We should put all the ideas on the table. We’re going to let the people decide. What do they want? Do we want more traffic cameras? Do we want a lot more development, where we have developers paying property taxes instead of us? Do we want to raise sales tax a little bit. These are all options.”
To “right-size” any proposals for generating revenue and cutting expenses in Edmonds, “we must first right-size the city budget,” Sefrioui said. But the first step is for residents to agree “on what kind of Edmonds we desire: both now and in the future.” That leads to an essential question: How much does it cost “to run a thriving and vibrant Edmonds.”
Organization co-founder Elise Hill then asked those attending to break into three groups to discuss three questions, with seven minutes allocated to each:
What makes Edmonds special/what do I love about it?
Where can Edmonds improve?
What am I not willing to give up (e.g. non-negotiables)?
During the group breakouts, participants wrote the answers to these questions on Post-It notes, which were attached to the library conference room window. Answers to what makes Edmonds special ranged from waterfront and mountain views, to light rail access, to parks, to diversity of people, to safety, to being walkable and bikeable, to its commitment to the arts. Areas for improvement — many of which were directed at city government — included words like proactive, strategic, vision, communication, financial management, personal property taxes, parking, transparency, city website, community engagement, better leveraging volunteers, and charging market rate for programs and services.
When is came to the question, “What am I not willing to give up?” answers included neighborhoods, “a real downtown,” the environment, parks, public safety, the Frances Anderson Center, the Edmonds Theater, the Edmonds Arts Festival and “the charm.”
As for next steps, Sefrioui said the organizers will take the group’s responses and populate them into a survey “that will then go out to hundreds, if not thousands, of residents in Edmonds. What’s important is to hear what everybody thinks.” He asked those attending to spread the word about the survey, once completed, to their own network of contacts.
Survey feedback will help develop priorities for addressing ways to raise revenue for the city, he explained. Then the Keep Edmonds Vibrant group plans to engage the city in determining what officials already explored, to determine what’s feasible and what isn’t.
“And then at the very, very end, our goal is to present that to [the city] council,” Sefrioui said. “This is what approximately this many people thought, this is what they’re comfortable with, and this is what we can choose. Whether they [the councilmembers] agree, that’s up to them, but the hope is that everybody’s voices are heard. And the truth is, is what you believe individually may not be what everybody else believes and that’s OK. That’s part of democracy.”
You can see the April 16 PowerPoint presentation here.
I had the opportunity to participate in this event, really enjoyed it and hope that we get even more participation in the next one! The Keep Edmonds Vibrant team is trying to get input from a wide sample of Edmonds through various forms including email, these groups sessions, and a survey that will be coming out. It genuinely seems like they are trying to establish what kind of city Edmonds wants to be instead of trying to convince everyone of a set agenda.
Dear Vibrant- The metric of FTE per number of city residents is meaningless. The population of a city doesn’t drive the workload of City staff. I am disappointed that you are repeating the song and dance of the mayor’s recent presentation to residents. (I grew up in Puyallup and think I know a bit about that Pierce County city. ) I worked in financial planning and analysis for the largest private utility in the state of Wash for 9 years, and as a certified management accountant I did activity based costing analysis. My personal perspective is that Edmonds has both a spending problem and a revenue problem. And the board of commissioners of South County Fire found an opportunity to worsen the spending problem, and cancelled the fire /EMS contract shortly after the council declared the fiscal emergency. They had 14 years to cancel the contract, but struck at what they perceived to be the perfect timing to encourage an annexation vote by the people of Edmonds. I encourage the leadership of Vibrant to attend the City Council’s revenue retreat. Follow the discussions on the Q1 budget amendments and the mayor’s proposed reorganization (which promotes one Director and makes only modest progress on increasing mgmt. span of control ). What will Edmonds do to capture some of the massive World Cup tourist spending? We’re late!
Won’t the traffic cameras pay for the deficit-sorry -I forgot that they were installed for safety-
My email to team@keepedmondsvsibrant.org bounced – says that email has expired. The website, PPT notes, etc don’t have alternate means of contacting organizers. How can people who want to get involved reach out beyond waiting until you have another meeting?
Facebook
Sorry about that, email should work now!
If we sell these properties, we would have no control what goes Into them..l would worry about what would happen to the Frances Anderson center such a part of our history
I realize these are hard times. Maybe like a family we could all kick in a bit to help this.
I am gonna hear about that. Just think about it.
Wrong conclusion, Ms. Accetturo. The City is empowered to plan future uses of any surplussed property and restrict the sale to buyers (developers) who would deliver on that plan. Future owners would also be limited by the zoning code.
That said, I do not support the surplussing and sale of the Frances Anderson Center, for all the reasons we heard at the recent Council meeting, and it was a little bewildering to see it listed as potential surplus prior to any public discussion. The City of Edmonds needs to do better community engagement; involve the public up front before elevating such controversial topics.
I think the concept of this effort is right. The city has relied on things like one-time COVID-related ARPA funds to backfill revenue shortfalls instead of taking more aggressive action to curb costs and create new revenue streams (beyond turning only to property tax increases). Selling city properties is another form of one-time revenue that can delay needed actions to balance our city budget on a long term basis. Many of the needed actions will be unpopular, but all options need to be on the table for robust debate. Those actions may include additional red light cameras, paid downtown street parking, increased city fees, fewer city subsidies, reduced parks maintenance, etc. The simple fact is we cannot afford everything our constituents would like the city to do, and taxpayers’ checkbooks will soon be further strained if the Proposition 1 RFA annexation vote passes.
Edmonds is fortunate to have so many engaged citizens eager to help the struggling City Council & Mayor with solving their many problems; especially the financial ones. The list just keeps growing: Edmonds Can Do Better; Alliance for Citizens of Edmonds; Edmonds Environmental Council; Edmonds Marsh Estuary Advocates, Citizens for Better Edmonds, Save Big Red Committee; Keep Edmonds Vibrant; and of course, the Mayor’s Blue-Ribbon Panel, and a pretty long list of paid consultants. I suspect the continuing emergence of these groups – including this latest one – to try to *help* the City make decisions can be interpreted many ways. I’ll leave it at that.