The past couple months have been a rollercoaster ride at the Port of Seattle.
In response to President Donald Trump’s tariff whipsaw, international cargo imports spiked in March and April as shippers tried to get ahead of anticipated tariffs.
Traffic through the ports of Seattle and Tacoma dropped significantly in recent weeks, but forecasts now predict a rebound. Shippers are trying to rush goods after the United States agreed to lower import taxes on China from 145% to 30% for a 90-day truce, according to Seattle port commissioner Ryan Calkins. Businesses fear what could come after those 90 days.
The president’s on-again, off-again relationship with tariffs “is not the optimal way to operate a port facility,” Calkins said Wednesday. “We really want a steady stream, rather than peaks and valleys.”
The instability means inconsistent work for local longshoremen, truckers and warehouse workers. And it’s left businesses struggling to plan.
“You’re planting seeds now in the spring, for harvest in the fall. And if you don’t know exactly whether you’ll be able to sell your soybeans to China or your corn to Southeast Asia, what does that mean for how you plant now?” Calkins said. “And unfortunately, I think it means that a lot of businesses are choosing to be conservative, and the knock-on impacts of that mean a drag on our economy.”
This uncertainty led Washington leaders, including Gov. Bob Ferguson, the mayors of Seattle and Spokane, state legislators, union officials and business groups, to call on judges to block the president’s tariffs.
Last month, a dozen states filed suit in the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York in a bid to stop the tariffs. The lawsuit, in which Washington is not a plaintiff, argues Trump has circumvented the congressional power to set trade policy outlined in the U.S. Constitution in setting tariffs.
The White House has said persistent trade deficits necessitated the tariffs.
The states argued their case in court Wednesday. The day before, the Washington officials tried to show the three judges overseeing the case the harms Trump’s tariffs have wrought on the state.
Washington is the ninth-largest exporter in the country, according to the state’s brief filed by pro-bono attorneys from the Seattle law firm Corr Cronin. Last year, Washington exported $57.8 billion in goods, making up over 7% of the state’s gross domestic product. Retaliatory tariffs other countries have instituted in response to Trump’s actions hurt the competitiveness of Washington’s products and threatens trade relationships, officials say.
The three countries Trump has singled out — China, Canada and Mexico — account for nearly half of Washington’s imports.
At a press conference Wednesday at the Port of Seattle, Ferguson used the example of North Cascades Builders Supply to emphasize how tariffs are impacting Washington businesses. The Okanogan County-based company imports windows from Canada, but uncertainty from tariffs has cost the business $250,000 in lost projects, the governor said.
“These reckless, erratic and illegal tariffs have thrown the global economy into chaos,” Ferguson said. “American working people and consumers, including Washingtonians, are paying the price.”
Ferguson’s comments came the day after he signed billions of dollars in new and increased taxes, including on businesses, to address a major budget shortfall.
Washington companies last year paid $2 billion in tariffs on imports. Trump’s tariffs could cost 10 times that, according to the state’s amicus brief.
Ferguson said “history will judge Congress” for its inaction to stop what he sees as the president’s abuse of power.
“I’m a governor, not a member of Congress, thank God,” he said.
Vehicle purchases are one area where consumers will see rising prices due to tariffs, even if cars are manufactured domestically, a national policy expert told a state panel Wednesday.
“All vehicles are going to get more expensive, regardless of where it is finally assembled,” said Nick Nigro, founder of Atlas Public Policy, in a presentation to the Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council. Panel members come from 10 state agencies leading the state’s efforts to transition to electric vehicles.
U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Democrat from Washington, has filed bipartisan legislation looking to flex the legislative branch’s muscles on tariffs. The bill would require the president to notify Congress of the imposition or increase in a tariff within 48 hours. The notice must explain the rationale and analyze potential impacts to the country’s businesses and consumers.
Within 60 days, Congress would have to pass a joint resolution approving the new tariff, or it would expire. Congress could also end tariffs at any time via resolution.
The proposal, known as the Trade Review Act of 2025, has very little chance of success in the Republican-controlled Congress.
Reporter Jerry Cornfield contributed to this report.
Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: info@washingtonstatestandard.com.
The self-imposed tariffs, also referred to as tax increases, recently enacted by Ferguson in Washington state, are likely to inflict significant harm on the state.
Exactly. This article is just cover for the Democratic Party.
Democrats with massive majority pass largest tax hike again in history and then do a PR blitz on how Trump bargaining with other countries is going to harm us. Huh. The party loyal will eat it up.
I don’t think the court can do anything but they may try and gum things up for a while, certainly Congress can act but they have largely abdicated its control over the matter to the president.
Brian, Matt and Jim, I know that you are wrong in blaming Democrats the way you do so consistently. There is not enough space in MENS for me to explain why I believe other than you do. I know the Democrats have lost their way from the times of FDR and LBJ. What has saved them in part is overcoming an affiliation with racist Southern Democrats. Now that faction has found refuge in the Republican Party, Trumpism and the MAGA movement. I know that I can separate respect for the person from disagreement with that individual’s positions on issues. From the way you write about those issues, I am not sure you can do the same. I believe governor Ferguson did a decent job trying to cover deep budget deficits.
Are there any Republicans responsible for all the tax increases in this city or state? The state budget has doubled in the last decade how has all that increased spending benefited us? Students are failing farther behind, homeless problem worse, roads and bridges worse I would even bet green house gas emissions are even up. Please tell me why we should be happy with Democrats? Certainly Republicans haven’t been standing in the way of progress we have made although I wouldn’t call it that. Tariffs was the topic I am not sure I agree with how it is being done but if in the end we can raise the price of imported goods so that American goods can compete on price I am all for it. Part of that is also business tax policy and rules and regulations. Will it work out who knows but if Democrats were in charge we would be seeing large tax increases just like we got in this state. Strange though the 50% of the people on the bottom in this state are getting crushed by high costs and higher taxes in recent years and you believe the govenor did a descent job.
The only time I have read about you close to being happy, Jim, is when you wrote about spending 33 cents for a cup of coffee. So I won’t attempt to find something that Democrats did which pleased you. The people “on the bottom in this state” are there for lots of reasons and are hurting. Governor Ferguson’s budget tries to spread around the pain we all feel. The Democrats attempted to put most of the burden of a deficit on the rich. Ferguson rejected that because he thought the courts would not allow it. This stance upset his standing in his party. You wrote, “Certainly Republicans haven’t been standing in the way of progress we have made although I wouldn’t call it that.” I don’t understand what you are trying to say here. The Republican Party, Abraham Lincoln’s party, eliminated slavery and went on to develop the civil service, replacing the patronage system. The party today wants to deny slavery existed and reinstate the patronage system.
Why yes, why is having a cheap staple a bad thing to be happy about? Do you suggest people should be entitled to expensive coffee everyday? Are Democrats responsible for the price of my staple? Government should be so inexpensive.
Jim, we have something in common! I enjoy a good cup of coffee as well. Never would I deny one to a fellow traveler. I only meant to remark how rare it is that I read you wax positive about anything. The cup of coffee struck me as a most unusual admission of pleasure.
The only people who can stop Trump’s tariffs currently are the Republicans in Congress who have granted him the executive power to arbitrarily install or withdraw the tariffs in some sort of international bargaining scheme. No one seems to know or understand what we are attempting to accomplish with this, so our markets are highly confused and not functioning as they normally would. Blaming the Democratic Party for any of this is just ludicrous and Sen. Cantwell’s attempts at bipartisan legislation to stop this craziness should be celebrated, not criticized. Attacking friendly and co-dependent countries like Canada and Mexico are the acts of a crazy person and not rational in any way, shape, or form. Threatening to annex Canada and Greenland are threats of aggression that would have Republicans screaming bloody murder if it were Biden or Obama doing it. Our politics at all levels of government have become nothing but a hypocritical theater of the absurd.
Well stated Clinton. Trump and his lackey lieutenants, Lutnick and Navarro, do not understand tariffs and certainly not industrial manufacturing.