Washington state Clemency and Pardons Board will be expanded

(Photo by RDNE Stock project)

Washington’s Clemency and Pardons Board will be expanded, and members will begin to receive pay under a state law approved earlier this year.

Enlarging the board is intended to help it hear more cases. In recent years, the number of people seeking and getting hearings has increased, but because the board consists of only five volunteer members and only meets four times a year, it limits the number of cases it can review.

“Because of that, we’ve seen people waiting multiple years now to get a hearing,” said Jennie Pasquarella, legal director at the Seattle Clemency Project.

The process used to only take a couple of months, Pasquarella said.

Rep. Roger Goodman, D-Kirkland, who sponsored House Bill 1131, said the bill is “part of our effort to create more mechanisms for mid-sentence review and possible release or commutation.”

Members of the Clemency and Pardons Board are appointed by the governor. They review applications and hold hearings on cases. But it is the governor who ultimately decides who is granted clemency or a pardon.

Clemency can involve reducing a sentence for a criminal conviction, also known as a commutation. A pardon absolves a person of guilt for a crime and can restore certain rights and privileges lost due to the conviction.

The new law will expand the board to 10 members. It also requires board members to represent different backgrounds, including an incarcerated individual, a representative of a faith-based organization, a federally recognized tribe member, and a member from a crime victim organization.

Board members will also be allowed to receive pay of up to $100 a day.

“We want people who have had different perspectives in the system to offer sort of a more balanced view,” Goodman said.

The bill also contained a controversial provision to allow the board to consider expediting a petition if the person has a pending deportation order or deportation proceeding. Originally, this provision was a separate bill sponsored by Sen. Bob Hasegawa, D-Tukwila.

When Hasegawa’s bill came to the House Community Safety Committee, which Goodman chairs, he said he didn’t move it forward because he didn’t know whether the bill would have the votes to pass. Hasegawa then approached him and asked him to include it in his bill. Goodman told him he would do so if Hasegawa could gain full approval from the Senate.

Goodman emphasized that there is no requirement in the law for the board to expedite cases for immigrants facing deportation, only to consider doing so.

Gov. Bob Ferguson issued a partial veto of the bill, removing a section that would not allow it to go into effect if funding wasn’t provided. The Legislature previously allocated $416,000 for the expansion in the current budget, but no funding for a related staff position at the governor’s office.

“I intend to seek the necessary funding to support the work contemplated by this legislation in the next budget,” Ferguson wrote in his veto letter.

The law allows the governor to start the process of appointing new board members in late July.

Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Washington State Standard maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Bill Lucia for questions: info@washingtonstatestandard.com.

  1. From my perspective the ten people who accept the governor’s appointment are exceptional citizens. It seems to me that they can make a lot of people angry while only pleasing the person in prison. I do believe their work is important and my tax dollars to pay for their work is money well spent. Hopefully next fiscal year the governor will allocate the funds needed.

    1. From the article the compensation is minimal on that note it is money well spent. The question becomes are their decisions going to cost us more than the benefit this might do.. the process to let go of and monitor and rearesst prosecute and put back in jail worth it. Maybe sometimes but a recent pardon from our former governor might just suggest best intentions don’t always serve us well. Always wanted to be a big fish but I am happy with being a salmon, a sardine on the other hand or Smelt is more like it endangered and the only surviving population is kept in tanks in a warehouse near San fransisco.

      1. Cute, Jim. I know for a fact that there are no shortages of sardines in Portugal. You might like it there. Yes, life has lots of questions and uncertainties. I believe part of the fun in life is figuring out answers. There is no enjoyment in the alternative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Real first and last names — as well as city of residence — are required for all commenters.
This is so we can verify your identity before approving your comment.

By commenting here you agree to abide by our Code of Conduct. Please read our code at the bottom of this page before commenting.